Skip to main content
Log in

Vowel Identification by Amplitude and Phase Contrast

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vowel identification is largely dependent on listeners’ access to the frequency of two or three peaks in the amplitude spectrum. Earlier work has demonstrated that, whereas normal-hearing listeners can identify harmonic complexes with vowel-like spectral shapes even with very little amplitude contrast between “formant” components and remaining harmonic components, listeners with hearing loss require greater amplitude differences. This is likely the result of the poor frequency resolution that often accompanies hearing loss. Here, we describe an additional acoustic dimension for emphasizing formant versus non-formant harmonics that may supplement amplitude contrast information. The purpose of this study was to determine whether listeners were able to identify “vowel-like” sounds using temporal (component phase) contrast, which may be less affected by cochlear loss than spectral cues, and whether overall identification improves when congruent temporal and spectral information are provided together. Five normal-hearing and five hearing-impaired listeners identified three vowels over many presentations. Harmonics representing formant peaks were varied in amplitude, phase, or a combination of both. In addition to requiring less amplitude contrast, normal-hearing listeners could accurately identify the sounds with less phase contrast than required by people with hearing loss. However, both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired groups demonstrated the ability to identify vowel-like sounds based solely on component phase shifts, with no amplitude contrast information, and they also showed improved performance when congruent phase and amplitude cues were combined. For nearly all listeners, the combination of spectral and temporal information improved identification in comparison to either dimension alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1
FIG. 2
FIG. 3
FIG. 4
FIG. 5
FIG. 6
FIG. 7
FIG. 8
FIG. 9
FIG. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcántara JI, Moore BCJ (1995) The identification of vowel-like harmonic complexes: effects of component phase, level, and fundamental frequency. J Acoust Soc Am 97:3813–3824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara JI, Holube I, Moore BCJ (1996) Effects of phase and level on vowel identification: data and predictions based on a nonlinear basilar-membrane model. J Acoust Soc Am 100:2382–2392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American National Standards Institute (2004) Specifications for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-2004). American National Standards Institute, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer T, Moore BCJ, Gatehouse S (1993) Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times. J Rehab Res Dev 30:49–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bleeck S, Ives T, Patterson RD (2004) Aim-mat: the auditory image model in MATLAB. Acta Acust United with Acustica 90:781–787

    Google Scholar 

  • DiGiovanni JJ, Nelson PB, Schlauch RS (2005) A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement. J Speech Lang Hear Res 48:1121–1135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dreisbach LE, Leek MR, Lentz JJ (2005) Perception of spectral contrast by hearing-impaired listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res 48:910–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giguère CD, Smoorenburg GF (1998) Computational modeling of outer hair cell damage: implications for hearing aid signal processing. In: Dau T, Kollmeier B, Hohmann V (eds) Psychophysics, physiology and models of hearing. World Scientific, Singapore, p 155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasberg BR, Moore BCJ (1990) Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 47:103–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glasberg BR, Moore BCJ (2002) A model of loudness applicable to time-varying sounds. J Aud Eng Soc 50:331–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Gockel H, Moore BCJ, Patterson RD (2003) Louder sounds can produce less forward masking: effects of component phase in complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 114:978–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leek MR, Summers V (1996) Reduced frequency resolution and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 100:1796–1806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leek MR, Dorman MF, Summerfield Q (1987) Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 81:148–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RL, Calhoun BM, Young ED (1999) Contrast enhancement improves the representation of /eh/-like vowels in the hearing-impaired auditory nerve. J Acoust Soc Am 106:2693–2708

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore BCJ (2007) Cochlear hearing loss: physiological, psychological and technical issues, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore BC, Glasberg BR (2004) A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Hear Res 188:70–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson RD (1994) The sound of a sinusoid: spectral models. J Acoust Soc Am 96:1409–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson RD (2000) Auditory images: how complex sounds are represented in the auditory system. J Acoust Soc Jap(E) 21:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson RD, Robinson K, Holdsworth J, McKeown D, Zhang C, Allerhand M (1992) Complex sounds and auditory images. In: Cazals Y, Horner K, Demany L (eds) Auditory physiology and perception. Pergamon, Oxford, p 429–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson RD, Allerhand MH, Giguère C (1995) Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform. J Acoust Soc Am 98:1890–1894

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson GE, Barney HL (1952) Control methods used in the study of vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 24:175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson AM, Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR (1990) Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 469:101–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Traunmüller H (1987) Phase vowels. In: Schouten MEH (ed) The psychophysics of speech perception. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, p 337–384

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grant no. R01 DC 00626 [PI: Leek] from the NIDCD. Diedesch was supported by T35 DC008764 [PI: Leek], also from the NIDCD. Support was also provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research &Development Service [Career Development grants C6116W (Molis) and C4963W (Gallun), and Senior Research Career Scientist award C4042L (Leek)]. The work was supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Portland VA Medical Center. The contents of this article do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle R. Molis.

Additional information

Portions of this research were presented at the 2008 meeting of the American Auditory Society, Scottsdale, AZ, and at the 2008 International Hearing Aid Conference, Lake Tahoe, CA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molis, M.R., Diedesch, A., Gallun, F. et al. Vowel Identification by Amplitude and Phase Contrast. JARO 14, 125–137 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-012-0352-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-012-0352-1

Keywords

Navigation