Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accidental removal of dialysis central venous catheter inserted for blood purification therapy: a single-center study

  • Original article
  • Published:
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Dialysis central venous catheters (DCs) are used for various blood purification therapies. Accidental removal of a DC is a potentially life-threatening event. However, the risk factors associated with accidental removal have rarely been discussed in the literature.

Methods

We performed a 5 year retrospective, single-center, cohort study of patients who were admitted to the ward other than intensive care units and were inserted DCs. We compared patient characteristics between patients who used DCs with and without a history of accidental removal.

Results

There were 17 cases of accidental removal (3.5%) out of 489 DC insertions during the observation period. There was no significant difference between patients with and without accidental removal in terms of age, sex, reason for DC insertion, catheter type, or insertion site. The presence of dementia was 35 and 11% (p = 0.006), and that of delirium was 88 and 13% (p < 0.0001) in those with and without accidental removal, respectively. The median days from insertion to accidental removal were 5 (range 0–21) days, and removal occurred mainly at night (71%). One patient with accidental removal developed hemorrhagic shock, but there no deaths occurred due to accidental removal.

Conclusions

The present findings suggest that to prevent accidental removal, sufficient attention should be paid to delirium that occurs after admission as well to pre-existing dementia at the time of admission. As accidental removal occurs most commonly early after insertion and at night, special attention should be paid during these periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dreifuss RM, Silberzweig JE. Inadvertent central venous catheter removal: a fatal complication. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19(12):1691–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2008.08.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brull SJ, Prielipp RC. Vascular air embolism: a silent hazard to patient safety. J Crit Care. 2017;42:255–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC, Agodoa LYC, Bragg-Gresham J, Balkrishnan R, et al. US renal data system. 2018 USRDS annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;73(3 Suppl 1):S1–772. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Okamoto T, Sakurada T, Koitabashi K, Shibagaki Y. Changes to indications for tunneled cuffed catheter use in hemodialysis patients: a single-center experience. Hemodial Int. 2018;22(S2):S3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.12697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yılmaz KB, Akıncı M, Şeker D, Güller M, Güneri G, Kulaçoğlu H. Factors affecting the safety of drains and catheters in surgical patients. Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2014;30(2):90–2. https://doi.org/10.5152/UCD.2014.2564.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu A, Wang T, Wen S. Peripheral intravenous catheters in situ for more than 96 h in adults: what factors affect removal? Int J Nurs Pract. 2016;22(6):529–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carrión MI, Ayuso D, Marcos M, Paz Robles M, de la Cal MA, Alía I, et al. Accidental removal of endotracheal and nasogastric tubes and intravascular catheters. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(1):63–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200001000-00010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179–84. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fricchione GL, Nejad SH, Esses JA, Cummings TJ, Querques J, Cassem NH, et al. Postoperative delirium. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(7):803–12. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08020181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maldonado JR. Neuropathogenesis of delirium: review of current etiologic theories and common pathways. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;21(12):1190–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2013.09.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ely EW, Gautam S, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Speroff T, et al. The impact of delirium in the intensive care unit on hospital length of stay. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(12):1892–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-001-1132-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Santos E, Cardoso D, Neves H, Cunha M, Rodrigues M, Apóstolo J. Effectiveness of haloperidol prophylaxis in critically ill patients with a high risk of delirium: a systematic review. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Rep. 2017;15(5):1440–72. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Balmforth JE, Thomas AN. Unplanned removal of medical devices in critical care units in North West England between 2011 and 2016. Am J Crit Care. 2019;28(3):213–21. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2019961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stroz MJ, Nathoo B, Stroz PM. Posteriorly tunneled dialysis catheters for permanent use in cognitively impaired patients undergoing hemodialysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(10):1621–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2014.06.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Mie Tagaya for creating and managing the database for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeki Kojima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors have declared no competing interests

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of St. Marianna University School of Medicine (IRB approval No. 5047) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study or their family members. Participants were informed that they had a right to not participate in the study and participants could refuse to answer the questionnaires during the process or withdraw from the study at any time.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kojima, S., Marui, Y., Shibagaki, Y. et al. Accidental removal of dialysis central venous catheter inserted for blood purification therapy: a single-center study. Clin Exp Nephrol 26, 1218–1222 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-022-02271-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-022-02271-4

Keywords

Navigation