Advertisement

Clinical and Experimental Nephrology

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 719–720 | Cite as

Instrument errors of an analyzer influence acid–base assessment

  • Masayuki TanemotoEmail author
Letter to the editor

Keywords

Acid–base Anion gap Diagnosis Electrolyte Instrument error 

Notes

Compliance of ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Berend K, de Vries AP, Gans RO. Physiological approach to assessment of acid–base disturbances. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(20):1434–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams BD, Bonzani TA, Hunter CJ. The anion gap does not accurately screen for lactic acidosis in emergency department patients. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(3):179–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kraut JA, Nagami GT. The serum anion gap in the evaluation of acid–base disorders: what are its limitations and can its effectiveness be improved? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(11):2018–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lacher DA. Relationship between delta checks for selected chemistry tests. Clin Chem. 1990;36(12):2134–6.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marques-Garcia F, Garcia-Codesal MF, Caro-Narros MR, Contreras-SanFeliciano T. Importance of implementing an analytical quality control system in a core laboratory. Rev Calid Asist. 2015;30(6):302–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Nephrology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal MedicineShin-Kuki General HospitalKukiJapan

Personalised recommendations