Advertisement

An inpatient educational program for chronic kidney disease

  • Shinji Machida
  • Yugo Shibagaki
  • Tsutomu Sakurada
Original article
  • 131 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant health problem in Japan, and prevention programs to slow disease progression are necessary. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of a 1-week inpatient education program, delivered during the predialysis stage of CKD, in slowing the deterioration in renal function over the subsequent 2 years, and identified factors influencing the program’s effectiveness.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 105 consecutive patients who completed the program, at the following time points: 6 months prior to program initiation, at program initiation and, at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the program. To identify factors predictive of program effectiveness, we classified patients into a Responder and Non-responder group.

Results

In comparison with the rate of deterioration in renal function (mL/min/1.73 m2/year) before admission, the rate slowed at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after discharge (all p < 0.01). A urinary protein (UP) level <0.5 g/gCr and CKD stages 4–5 were predictive of a slowing of CKD progression after the education program.

Conclusions

Although the effectiveness of our program declined over time, it did produce an overall slowing in the rate of renal function deterioration over the 2-year period of observation after discharge. This slowing of CKD progression was more pronounced in patients with low UP levels, indicating that education programs should be considered while these levels are still low. Furthermore, the program still offers benefits to patients with CKD stages 4–5.

Keywords

Chronic kidney disease Education program Predialysis Renal function 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Koji Hiraki, Michi Shibata, and Mie Tagaya for collecting the data of this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding this study.

Ethics standards

Our study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of St. Marianna Medical University Hospital (approval no. 3923), with the need for informed consent waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Imai E, Horio M, Watanabe T, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the Japanese general population. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2009;13:621–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nakai S, Watanabe Y, Masakane I, et al. Overview of regular dialysis treatment in Japan (as of 31 December 2011). Ther Apher Dial. 2013;17:567–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matsushita K, van der Velde M, Astor BC, et al. Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:2073–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nakayama M, Sato T, Miyazaki M, et al. Increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality among non-diabetic chronic kidney disease patients with hypertensive nephropathy: the Gonryo study. Hypertens Res. 2011;34:1106–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen PM, Lai TS, Chen PY, et al. Multidisciplinary care program for advanced chronic kidney disease: reduces renal replacement and medical costs. Am J Med. 2015;128:68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shi Y, Xiong J, Chen Y, et al. The effectiveness of multidisciplinary care models for patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50:301–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang SM, Hsiao LC, Ting IW, et al. Multidisciplinary care in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2015;26:640–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Japanese Society of Nephrology. Dietary recommendations for chronic kidney disease. Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi. 2014;56:553–99 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maroni BJ, Steinman TI, Mitch WE, et al. A method for estimating nitrogen intake of patients with chronic renal failure. Kidney Int. 1985;27:58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wexler DJ, Beauharnais CC, Regan S, et al. Impact of inpatient diabetes management, education, and improved discharge transition on glycemic control 12 months after discharge. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;98:249–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fritsche A, Stumvoll M, Goebbel S, et al. Long term effect of a structured inpatient diabetes teaching and treatment programme in type 2 diabetic patients: influence of mode of follow-up. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1999;46:135–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sara J, Healy D, Black C, Harris, et al. Inpatient diabetes education is associated with less frequent hospital readmission among patients with poor glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:2960–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ueno R, Hatta T, Kawasaki Y, et al. Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi. Effect of an educational admission program for patients at the conservative phase of chronic kidney disease (CKD). 2013;55:956–65 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lacson E Jr, Wang W, DeVries C, et al. Effects of a nationwide predialysis educational program on modality choice, vascular access, and patient outcomes. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;58:235–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lopez-Vargas PA, Tong A, Howell M, et al. Educational interventions for patients with CKD: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68:353–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yamagata K, Makino H, Iseki K, et al. Effect of behavior modification on outcome in early- to moderate-stage chronic kidney disease: a cluster-randomized trial. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0151422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peterson JC, Adler S, Burkart JM, et al. Blood pressure control, proteinuria, and the progression of renal disease. The modification of diet in renal disease study. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:754–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jafar TH, Stark PC, Schmid CH, et al. Proteinuria as a modifiable risk factor for the progression of non-diabetic renal disease. Kidney Int. 2001;60:1131–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Iimori S, Naito S, Noda Y, et al. Prognosis of chronic kidney disease with normal-range proteinuria: the CKD-ROUTE study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0190493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Nephrology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shinji Machida
    • 1
  • Yugo Shibagaki
    • 1
  • Tsutomu Sakurada
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Nephrology and HypertensionSt. Marianna University School of MedicineKawasakiJapan

Personalised recommendations