Skip to main content

Impact of prophylactic mupirocin for radical esophagectomy

Abstract

The preoperative intranasal application of mupirocin significantly decreases the rate of nosocomial S. aureus infections among patients who are S. aureus carriers. However, it remains unclear whether the routine preoperative use of mupirocin would reduce postoperative S. aureus infections, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, and who would benefit from the prophylactic use of mupirocin. Ninety-six consecutive patients who had undergone elective radical esophagectomy with right thoracotomy and laparotomy were evaluated. Fifty-one patients were given 2% mupirocin calcium ointment 3 times daily over 3 consecutive days before surgery. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors affecting the following three issues: postoperative MRSA infection, postoperative pneumonia, and the length of postoperative hospital stay. In univariate analyses, the preoperative application of mupirocin significantly reduced MRSA infection, postoperative pneumonia, and length of postoperative hospital stay. Multivariate analyses indicated significant associations between mupirocin administration and reductions in both MRSA infection and postoperative pneumonia, but not in length of postoperative hospital stay. Radical esophagectomy with right thoracotomy and laparotomy for esophageal carcinoma warranted the preoperative prophylactic administration of mupirocin in order to reduce postoperative infectious complications from MRSA. Its routine use for such a high-risk procedure is entirely reasonable.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. JA Kluytmans JW Mouton MF VandenBergh MJ Manders AP Maat JH Wagenvoort et al. (1996) ArticleTitleReduction of surgical site infections in cardiothoracic surgery by elimination of nasal carriage of S. aureus Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 17 780–5 Occurrence Handle8985763 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s7jvVOmsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. GE Cimochowski MD Harostock R Brown M Bernardi N Alonzo K Coyle (2001) ArticleTitleIntranasal mupirocin reduces sternal wound infection after open-heart surgery in diabetics and nondiabetics Ann Thorac Surg 71 1572–9 Occurrence Handle11383802 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzhtVektA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02519-X

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. AJ Gernaat-van der Sluis AM Hoogenboom-Verdegaal PJ Edixhoven NH Spies-van Rooijen (1998) ArticleTitleProphylactic mupirocin could reduce orthopedic wound infections Acta Orthop Scand 69 412–4 Occurrence Handle9798453 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FhsFWrtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.3109/17453679808999058

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. BS Bloom AM Fendrick ME Chernew P Patel (1996) ArticleTitleClinical and economic effects of mupirocin calcium on preventing Staphylococcus aureus infection in hemodialysis patients: a decision analysis Am J Kid Dis 27 687–94 Occurrence Handle8629629 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XjtlSisrg%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. CO Solberg (2000) ArticleTitleSpread of Staphylococcus aureus in hospitals: causes and prevention Scand J Infect Dis 32 587–95 Occurrence Handle11200366 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FgsFegsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1080/003655400459478

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M Yano Y Doki M Inoue T Tsujinaka H Shiozaki M Monden (2000) ArticleTitlePreoperative intranasal mupirocin ointment significantly reduces postoperative infection with Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery Surg Today 30 16–21 Occurrence Handle10648077 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXpsFChsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/PL00010040

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. TM Perl JJ Cullen RP Wenzel MB Zimmerman MA Pfaller D Sheppard et al. (2002) ArticleTitleIntranasal mupirocin to prevent postoperative Staphylococcus aureus infections N Engl J Med 346 1871–7 Occurrence Handle12063371 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XksVentb8%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa003069

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. MD Kalmeijer H Coertjens PM van Nieuwland-Bollen D Bogaers-Hofman GA de Baere A Stuurman et al. (2002) ArticleTitleSurgical site infection in orthopedic surgery: the effect of mupirocin nasal ointment in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study Clin Infect Dis 35 353–8 Occurrence Handle12145715 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XmvFSgu74%3D Occurrence Handle10.1086/341025

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y Suzuki T Kamigaki Y Fujino M Tominaga Y Ku Y Kuroda (2003) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial of preoperative intranasal mupirocin to reduce surgical-site infection after digestive surgery Br J Surg 90 1072–5 Occurrence Handle12945073 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXkvFKqtbo%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4269

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M Carrier R Marchand P Auger Y Hebert M Pellerin LP Perrault et al. (2002) ArticleTitleMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in a cardiac surgical unit J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123 40–4 Occurrence Handle11782754 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mtc.2002.118505

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. KB Laupland JM Conly (2003) ArticleTitleTreatment of Staphylococcus aureus colonization and prophylaxis for infection with topical intranasal mupirocin: an evidence-based review Clin Infect Dis 37 933–8 Occurrence Handle13130405 Occurrence Handle10.1086/377735

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A Sunada S Asari (2003) ArticleTitleReport of questionnaire survey for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae between 1998 and 2000 in the Kinki district Kansenshogaku Zasshi, Journal of the Japanese Association for Infections Diseases 77 331–9

    Google Scholar 

  13. S Tsutsui S Moriguchi M Morita H Kuwano H Matsuda M Mori et al. (1992) ArticleTitleMultivariate analysis of postoperative complications after esophageal resection Ann Thorac Surg 53 1052–6 Occurrence Handle1596128 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK383otFeltA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/0003-4975(92)90388-K

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. T Nishimaki T Suzuki S Suzuki S Kuwabara K Hatakeyama (1998) ArticleTitleOutcomes of extended radical esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer J Am Coll Surg 186 306–12 Occurrence Handle9510261 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7mvFSrsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00013-1

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. SM Griffin IH Shaw SM Dresner (2002) ArticleTitleEarly complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management J Am Coll Surg 194 285–97 Occurrence Handle11893132 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(01)01177-2

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. SH Bailey DA Bull DH Harpole JJ Rentz LA Neumayer TN Pappas et al. (2003) ArticleTitleOutcomes after esophagectomy: a 10-year prospective cohort Ann Thorac Surg 75 217–22 Occurrence Handle12537219 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04368-0

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. T Nozoe Y Kimura M Ishida H Saeki D Korenaga K Sugimachi (2002) ArticleTitleCorrelation of pre-operative nutritional condition with post-operative complications in surgical treatment for oesophageal carcinoma Eur J Surg Oncol 28 396–400 Occurrence Handle12099649 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zlslSgsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1053/ejso.2002.1257

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. MF vandenBergh JA Kluytmans BA Van Hout AP Maat RJ Seerden J McDonnel et al. (1996) ArticleTitleCost-effectiveness of perioperative mupirocin nasal ointment in cardiothoracic surgery Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 17 786–92 Occurrence Handle8985764 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s7jvVOmtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1086/647237

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P Davey AM Craig C Hau M Malek (1999) ArticleTitleCost-effectiveness of prophylactic nasal mupirocin in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis based on a randomized, placebo-controlled trial J Antimicrob Chemother 43 105–12 Occurrence Handle10381107 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXhtFGksbg%3D Occurrence Handle10.1093/jac/43.1.105

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. G Nardi AD Silvestre A De Monte D Massarutti A Proietti M Troncon et al. (2001) ArticleTitleReduction in Gram-positive pneumonia and antibiotic consumption following the use of a SDD protocol including nasal and oral mupirocin Eur J Emerg Med 8 203–14 Occurrence Handle11587466 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrjvF2mtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00063110-200109000-00008

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. JS Bertino SuffixJr (1997) ArticleTitleIntranasal mupirocin for outbreaks of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aures Am J Health Syst Pharm 54 2185–91 Occurrence Handle9331438 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXmslyhsrk%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. SJ Swanson HF Batirel R Bueno MT Jaklitsch JM Lukanich E Allred et al. (2001) ArticleTitleTransthoracic esophagectomy with radical mediastinal and abdominal lymph node dissection and cervical esophagogastrostomy for esophageal carcinoma Ann Thorac Surg 72 1918–25 Occurrence Handle11789772 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FmsVWntw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03203-9

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. N Altorki M Kent C Ferrara J Port (2002) ArticleTitleThree-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus Ann Surg 236 177–83 Occurrence Handle12170022 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200208000-00005

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H Fujita S Sueyoshi T Tanaka T Fujii U Toh T Mine et al. (2003) ArticleTitleOptimal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus: comparing the short- and long-term outcome among the four types of lymphadenectomy World J Surg 27 571–9 Occurrence Handle12715226 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-003-6913-z

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. NT Nguyen DM Follette BM Wolfe PD Schneider P Roberts JE Goodnight (2000) ArticleTitleComparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy Arch Surg 135 920–5 Occurrence Handle10922253 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvhs12rsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.135.8.920

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. JD Luketich M Alvelo-Rivera PO Buenaventura NA Christie JS McCaughan VR Litle et al. (2003) ArticleTitleMinimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients Ann Surg 238 486–95 Occurrence Handle14530720

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. B Mayall R Martin AM Keenan L Irving P Leeson K Lamb (1996) ArticleTitleBlanket use of intranasal mupirocin for outbreak control and long-term prophylaxis of endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an open ward J Hosp Infect 32 257–66 Occurrence Handle8744510 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28zgt1KisA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0195-6701(96)90036-5

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J Kluytmans (1998) ArticleTitleReduction of surgical site infections in major surgery by elimination of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus J Hosp Infect 40 S25–9 Occurrence Handle9777530 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0195-6701(98)90201-8

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. TM Perl (2003) ArticleTitlePrevention of Staphylococcus aureus infections among surgical patients: beyond traditional perioperative prophylaxis Surgery 134 IssueID5 Suppl S10–7 Occurrence Handle14647028 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0039-6060(03)00391-X

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. R Annigeri J Conly S Vas H Dedier KP Prakashan JM Bargman et al. (2001) ArticleTitleEmergence of mupirocin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients using mupirocin prophylaxis to prevent exit-site infection Perit Dial Int 21 554–9 Occurrence Handle11783763 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FlslKgug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. M Perez-Fontan M Rosales A Rodrigez-Carmona TG Falcon F Valdes (2002) ArticleTitleMupirocin resistance after long-term use for Staphylococcus aureus colonization in patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis Am J Kidney Dis 39 337–41 Occurrence Handle11840374 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XitVChs7o%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. JS Berns (2003) ArticleTitleInfection with antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms in dialysis patients Seminar Dial 16 30–7 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1525-139X.2003.03009.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuki Unemura.

About this article

Cite this article

Unemura, Y., Ishida, Y., Suzuki, Y. et al. Impact of prophylactic mupirocin for radical esophagectomy. J Infect Chemother 12, 257–263 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-006-0458-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-006-0458-7

Key words

  • Mupirocin
  • Esophagectomy
  • Cancer of esophagus
  • Surgical site infection
  • Pneumonia