Abstract
Endometriosis is a benign gynecologic affection that may lead to major surgeries, such as colorectal resections. Rectovaginal fistulas (RVF) are among the possible complications. When they occur, it is necessary to adapt the repair surgery as best as possible to limit their functional consequences. This video shows three different techniques for correcting RVF after rectal resection for endometriosis, with a combination of perineal surgery and laparoscopy: a mucosal flap, a transanal transection and single stapled anastomosis (TTSS) and a pull through.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 469658 KB)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
No research data are available outside the submitted manuscript file.
References
Viganò P, Parazzini F, Somigliana E, Vercellini P (2004) Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18(2):177–200
International Working Group of AAGL, ESGE, ESHRE and WES, Tomassetti C, Johnson NP et al (2021) An international terminology for endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2021(4):hoab029
Falcone T, Flyckt R (2018) Clinical management of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Mars 131(3):557–571
Abo C, Moatassim S, Marty N et al (2018) Postoperative complications after bowel endometriosis surgery by shaving, disc excision, or segmental resection: a three-arm comparative analysis of 364 consecutive cases. Fertil Steril 109(1):172–178.e1
Zheng Y, Zhang N, Lu W et al (2018) Rectovaginal fistula following surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis: does lesion size matter? J Int Med Res 46(2):852–864
Roman H, Dennis T, Forestier D et al (2023) Excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis nodules with large infiltration of both rectum and vagina: what is a reasonable rate of preventive stoma? A comparative study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 30(2):147–155
Spinelli A, Foppa C, Carvello M et al (2021) Transanal transection and single-stapled anastomosis (TTSS): a comparison of anastomotic leak rates with the double-stapled technique and with transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 47(12):3123–3129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2021.08.002
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.P. and C.J. edited the video and participated in one of the three surgeries. They wrote the manuscript together. Q.D., M.-O.F and V.A. were the colorectal surgeons in these videos. T.D., B.M. and H.W. were the gynecologists of these patients. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests as defined by Springer, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Potolicchio, A., Jehaes, C., Merlot, B. et al. Treatment techniques for rectovaginal fistulas after low rectal resection for deep endometriosis. Tech Coloproctol 28, 51 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-02923-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-02923-5