Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction to: Techniques in Coloproctology https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02703-z
The “Results” section was incorrect in the abstract text and it should read as given below.
Results
Two hundred forty R-CR (mean age 64.9 ± 12.4 years) and 258 L-CR (mean age 66.4 ± 15.5 years) patients met the inclusion criteria. The overall mean direct cost between R-CR and L-CR was significantly higher ($8756 vs $7776 respectively, p = 0.001) as well as the supply cost per case ($3789 vs $2122, p < 0.001). Operating time was also higher for R-CR than L-CR (224 min vs 187 min, p = 0.066) but LOS was slightly lower (5.08 days vs 5.55 days, p = 0.113).
The original article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ezeokoli, E.U., Hilli, R. & Wasvary, H.J. Correction to: Index cost comparison of laparoscopic vs robotic surgery in colon and rectal cancer resection: a retrospective financial investigation of surgical methodology innovation at a single institution. Tech Coloproctol 27, 69 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02720-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02720-y