Abstract
Background
Hartmann’s reversal can be complicated by the presence of dense adhesions in the upper part of the abdominal cavity, difficulties in freeing the splenic flexure with the risk of splenic tears, a lack of sufficient colonic length, the risk of ureteral lesion, or the risk of lesions of the vascular arcade.
Methods
We propose a technique which consists of interposing an adapted segment of ileal loop between the end of the proximal colon and the rectum to restore intestinal continuity.
Results
Two patients had Hartmann procedure, the first for a Hinchey stage 4 perforated diverticulitis and the second for a colorectal fistula due to ischemia of the proximal colonic segment. Hartmann’s reversal was expected to be difficult, so a suspended ileal loop was used. The outcomes were uneventful, and functional results were satisfactory.
Conclusions
A suspended ileal loop could be used as a salvage procedure in some cases of potentially difficult Hartmann’s reversal.
References
Horesh N, Rudnicki Y, Dreznik Y et al (2018) Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: still a complicated operation. Tech Coloproctol 22:81–87
Mirza KL, Wickham CJ, Noren ER et al (2021) Outcomes of colostomy takedown following Hartmann’s procedure: successful restoration of continuity comes with a high risk of morbidity. Colorectal Dis 23:967–974
Mishra A, Gosselink MP, Mortensen NJ et al (2015) Problem solving after marginal artery injury during splenic flexure mobilization – a video vignette. Colorectal Dis 17:174–175
Horesh N, Lessing Y, Rudnicki Y et al (2017) Considerations for Hartmann’s reversal and Hartmann’s reversal outcomes: a multicenter study. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:1577–1582
Chavrier D, Alves A, Menahem B (2022) Is laparoscopy a reliable alternative to laparotomy in Hartmann’s reversal? An updated meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 26:239–252
Whitney S, Gross BD, Mui A, Hahn S, Read B, Bauer J (2020) Hartmann’s reversal: factors affecting complications and outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 35:1875–1880
Dufour B, Bonnaud P (1980) “Suspended” segmental replacement of the ureter using the ileum. Experimental results at five years. J Urol (Paris) 86:515–518 (Article in French)
Wolff B, Chartier-Kastler E, Mozer P, Haertig A, Bitker MO, Rouprêt M (2011) Long-term functional outcomes after ileal ureter substitution: a single-center experience. Urology 78:692–695
Fernoux H (1984) Sigmoid resection with delayed anastomosis: an original procedure in addition to 2-stage surgery. Chirurgie 110:87–96 ([in French])
ChenYC FA, Shen MY et al (2020) Colorectal anastomosis after laparoscopic extended left colectomy: techniques and outcome. Colorectal Dis 22:1189–1194
Sciuto A, Grifasi C, Pirozzi CF, Leon P, Pirozzi REM, Corcione F (2016) Laparoscopic Deloyers procedure for tension-free anastomosis after extended left colectomy: technique and results. Tech Coloproctol 20:865–869
Thompson DT, Hrabe JE (2021) Staged approaches to restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal pouch-when and why? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 31:875–880
Rumstadt B, Schilling D, Sturm J (2008) Interposition of small bowel as replacement for the descending colon. Can J Surg 5:99–100
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest exists.
Ethical approval
The study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Informed consent
For this type of study French law does not require formal consent. The patients consented that data about their surgery and follow up could be used and published in the context of clinical research.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernoux, P., Delorme, E., Foote, A. et al. The suspended ileal loop for difficult Hartmann’s reversal. Tech Coloproctol 27, 243–246 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02715-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02715-9