Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bowel seromuscular flaps used to repair pelvic defects in patients undergoing reoperative surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pedicled seromuscular bowel flaps may serve as an alternative for pelvic floor reconstruction when conventional omental and muscular flaps are not an option in patients undergoing reoperative abdominopelvic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate a unique series of bowel seromuscular flaps used to obliterate intrapelvic defects.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study on all patients in a single tertiary care institutional database who had undergone pelvic reconstruction with a seromuscular bowel flap from January 2006 to December 2018. The primary outcomes measured were the 30-day morbidity and mortality rates.

Results

Twelve patients (6 men 6 women, median age 56.5 years [range 33–77 years]) underwent reoperative abdominopelvic surgery requiring the use of a native small or large seromuscular bowel flap to obliterate pelvic defects. The indications for surgery included chronic infections, fistulizing Crohn’s disease, and cancer. In all cases, no residual omentum was available and rectus abdominis muscle flaps were not feasible due to prior operative scars. Thirty-day morbidity occurred in 5 patients (42%), and included urine leak from ureteral injury, anastomotic leak, acute kidney injury, and superficial surgical site infection. No flaps became ischemic or required removal in the postoperative setting. No mortality was recorded.

Conclusions

Bowel seromuscular flaps are a feasible and safe alternative for covering pelvic defects in patients who are undergoing reoperative surgery without the option to use traditional omental and muscular flaps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maggiori L, Panis Y (2013) Surgical management of IBD—from an open to a laparoscopic approach. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10(5):297–306. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.30 (Epub 2013 Feb 19)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilkinson N (2020) Management of rectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 100(3):615–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2020.02.014 (Epub 2020 Apr 15)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown KGM, Koh CE (2020) Surgical management of recurrent colon cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 11(3):513–525. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-2019-ccm-09

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sagebiel TL, Faria SC, Balachandran A, Sacks JM, You YN, Bhosale PR (2011) Pelvic reconstruction with omental and VRAM flaps: anatomy, surgical technique, normal postoperative findings, and complications. Radiographics 31(7):2005–2019. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.317115112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Musters GD, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ (2014) Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 57(9):1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cao AM, Ellis-Clark JM, Shakeshaft AJ (2021) Small-bowel seromuscular flap as a novel technique for intrapelvic filling. Dis Colon Rectum 64(3):e55. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chessin DB, Hartley J, Cohen AM, Mazumdar M, Cordeiro P, Disa J, Mehrara B, Minsky BD, Paty P, Weiser M, Wong WD, Guillem JG (2005) Rectus flap reconstruction decreases perineal wound complications after pelvic chemoradiation and surgery: a cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 12(2):104–110. https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.03.100 (Epub 2005 Feb 3)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brodbeck R, Horch RE, Arkudas A, Beier JP (2015) Plastic and reconstructive surgery in the treatment of oncological perineal and genital defects. Front Oncol 5:212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00212

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Killeen S, Devaney A, Mannion M, Martin ST, Winter DC (2013) Omental pedicle flaps following proctectomy: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 15(11):e634–e645. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Radwan RW, Tang AM, Harries RL, Davies EG, Drew P, Evans MD (2021) Vertical rectus abdominis flap (VRAM) for perineal reconstruction following pelvic surgery: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 74(3):523–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.100 (Epub 2020 Nov 9)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sahakitrungruang C, Atittharnsakul P (2012) Colonic flap with mucosa removed: a novel technique for pelvic reconstruction after exenteration of advanced pelvic malignancy. Tech Coloproctol 16(5):373–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0865-y (Epub 2012 Aug 11)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aho J, Winocour S, Hammoudeh ZS, Nelson H, Rose P, Tran NV (2015) Seromuscular colonic flap for intrapelvic soft-tissue coverage: a reconstructive option for plastic surgeons when traditionally used flaps are not available. Case Rep Surg 2015:563641. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/563641 (Epub 2015 Nov 24)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Urbán D, Marei MM, Hajnal D, Varga G, Érces D, Poles M, Imre D, Szabó A, Cervellione RM, Cserni T (2020) Mucosectomy disrupting the enteric nervous system causes contraction and shrinkage of gastrointestinal flaps: potential implications for augmentation cystoplasty. J Pediatr Urol 16(1):20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.08.019 (Epub 2019 Sep 18)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cervellione RM, Hajnal D, Varga G, Rakoczy G, Kaszaki J, Keene D, Goyal A, Dickson A, Cserni T (2017) Mucosectomy impairs ileal microcirculation and results in flap contraction after experimental ileocystoplasty. J Pediatr Urol 13(1):81.e1-81.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.11.007 (Epub 2016 Nov 29)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Asaad M, Vyas KS, Tran NV (2020) Reconstruction of complex abdominal wall defect with autogenous pedicled demucosalized seromuscular flap. Ann Plast Surg 84(6):697–699. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

No specific funding was received from any bodies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors to carry out the work described in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by JSB and BRH. The first draft of the manuscript was written by JSB and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. L. Mathis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical and Informed Consent statements

Institutional Review Board permissions were obtained prior to the start of the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bauzon, J.S., Tran, N.V., Hebert, B.R. et al. Bowel seromuscular flaps used to repair pelvic defects in patients undergoing reoperative surgery. Tech Coloproctol 27, 373–378 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02697-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02697-8

Keywords

Navigation