Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse after a laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy

  • Technical Advances
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. van der Schans EM, Boom MA, El Moumni M, Verheijen PM, Broeders IAMJ, Consten ECJ (2022) Mesh-related complications and recurrence after ventral mesh rectopexy with synthetic versus biologic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 26(2):85–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lobb HS, Kearsey CC, Ahmed S, Rajaganeshan R (2021) Suture rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for complete full-thickness rectal prolapse and intussusception: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open. 5(1):37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI, Nelson RL (2008) Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:1758. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001758.pub2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Senapati A, Gray RG, Middleton LJ, Harding J, Hills RK, Armitage NC, Buckley L, Northover JM (2013) PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 15(7):858–868

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fu CW, Stevenson AR (2017) Risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 60(2):178–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smyth E, Sileri P, Jones O, Cunningham C, Urban J, Lindsey I (2012) Patients with benign joint hypermobility and rectal prolapse: a complex subgroup of patients. Colorectal Dis 14(Suppl. 1):35

    Google Scholar 

  7. van Iersel JJ, Paulides TJ, Verheijen PM, Lumley JW, Broeders IA, Consten EC (2016) Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse. World J Gastroenterol 22(21):4977–4987

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Laitakari KE, Mäkelä-Kaikkonen JK, Kairaluoma M, Junttila A, Kössi J, Ohtonen P, Rautio TT (2021) Redo ventral rectopexy: is it worthwhile? Tech Coloproctol 25(3):299–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smart NJ, Pathak S, Boorman P, Daniels IR (2013) Synthetic or biological mesh use in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy–a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 15(6):650–654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No specific funding was received to perform this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. R. Brown.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

As this was a retrospective review of standard practice, no ethical approval was sought.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained in accordance with the standards set forth by hospital regulations.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, S.R., Pearson, K., Hainsworth, A. et al. Treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse after a laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy. Tech Coloproctol 26, 991–995 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02689-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02689-8

Navigation