Abstract
The management of low rectal cancer is a perennial challenge for colorectal surgeons. The benefits of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in low rectal cancer are to secure the distal margin and avoid surgical space constraints within the deep pelvis. However, anastomotic leak remains an important concern. We report our technique and results combining TaTME with delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) without bowel diversion. First, the splenic flexure, left colon and rectum are laparoscopically mobilized to mid-rectum. TaTME is performed to complete the distal rectal mobilization, and the specimen is delivered transanally and transected. The abdominoperineal colonic pull-through is secured to the anal canal and hypertonic dressing is applied regularly in the ward. The handsewn DCAA is performed one week later. An accompanying video demonstrates this technique. Five consecutive patients with low rectal cancer underwent TaTME with DCAA. All had upfront surgical resection except one who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy. Mean operative duration, blood loss, and length of hospital stay was 290 (250–375) min, 142 (10–200) ml and 11.6 (10–14) days respectively. One patient (20%) suffered a postoperative complication of persistent urinary retention, requiring an indwelling urinary catheter on discharge. There were no cases of open conversion and no instances of anastomotic leakage. Two patients (40%) had minor low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and one (20%) had major LARS. TaTME and DCAA without stoma are complimentary techniques that augment the minimally invasive effects of laparoscopic sphincter-sparing low rectal cancer surgery, with good perioperative outcomes.
References
Sylla P, Knol JJ, D’Andrea AP et al (2021) Urethral injury and other urologic injuries during transanal total mesorectal excision: an international collaborative study. Ann Surg 274:e115–e125
Wasmuth HH, Faerden AE, Myklebust TÅ et al (2020) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway. Br J Surg 107:121–130
Seow-En I, Seow-Choen F (2020) Comment on: transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been abandoned in Norway. Br J Surg 107:e223
Ryan OK, Ryan ÉJ, Creavin B et al (2021) Surgical approach for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, robotic and transanal TME approaches. Eur J Surg Oncol 47:285–295
Roodbeen SX, Penna M, van Dieren S et al (2021) Local recurrence and disease-free survival after transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the International TaTME Registry. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 19(11):1232–1240
Pommergaard HC, Gessler B, Burcharth J, Angenete E, Haglind E, Rosenberg J (2014) Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 16:662–671
Phan K, Oh L, Ctercteko G et al (2019) Does a stoma reduce the risk of anastomotic leak and need for re-operation following low anterior resection for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Oncol 10:179–187
Vogel I, Shinkwin M, van der Storm SL et al (2022) Overall readmissions and readmissions related to dehydration after creation of an ileostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 26:333–349
Turnbull RB Jr, Cuthbertson A (1961) Abdominorectal pull-through resection for cancer and for Hirschsprung’s disease. Delayed posterior colorectal anastomosis. Cleve Clin Q 28:109–115
Cutait DE, Figliolini FJ (1961) A new method of colorectal anastomosis in abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 4:335–342
Biondo S, Trenti L, Espin E et al (2020) Two-stage Turnbull–Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 155:e201625
Portale G, Popesc GO, Parotto M, Cavallin F (2019) Delayed colo-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer: pelvic morbidity, functional results and oncological outcomes: a systematic review. World J Surg 43:1360–1369
La Raja C, Foppa C, Maroli A et al (2022) Surgical outcomes of Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis with pull-through versus immediate coloanal anastomosis with diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [published online ahead of print, 2022 Mar 28]. Tech Coloproctol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02601-4
Madbouly KM, Emile SH, Gamal AA (2022) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) with delayed coloanal anastomosis versus TaTME with immediate coloanal anastomosis and temporary diversion in middle and low rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 125:865–871
Lin SY, Ow ZGW, Tan DJH et al (2022) Delayed coloanal anastomosis as a stoma-sparing alternative to immediate coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 92:346–354
Melka D, Leiritz E, Labiad C et al (2022) Delayed pull-through coloanal anastomosis without temporary stoma: an alternative to the standard manual side-to-end coloanal anastomosis with temporary stoma? A comparative study in 223 patients with low rectal cancer [published online ahead of print, 2022 Jan 29]. Colorectal Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16069
Seow-En I, Seow-Choen F (2018) an initial experience comparing robotic total mesorectal excision (RTME) and transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for low rectal tumours. Ann Acad Med Singap 47:188–190
Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S et al (2019) Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the International TaTME Registry. Ann Surg 269:700–711
Seow-En I, Chok AY, Tan EK (2022) Transanal total mesorectal excision with two stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through for delayed low anastomotic leakage—a video vignette. Colorectal Dis 24:331–332
Ihnát P, Guňková P, Peteja M, Vávra P, Pelikán A, Zonča P (2016) Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection. Surg Endosc 30:4809–4816
Trenti L, Galvez A, Biondo S et al (2018) Quality of life and anterior resection syndrome after surgery for mid to low rectal cancer: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Surg Oncol 44:1031–1039
Funding
There were no sources of funding for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article received SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board approval (CIRB no. 2022/2179).
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained for all study participants.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seow-En, I., Ng, Y.YR., Tan, I.B.H. et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision and delayed coloanal anastomosis without stoma for low rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 27, 75–81 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02677-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02677-y