Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transanal total mesorectal excision and delayed coloanal anastomosis without stoma for low rectal cancer

  • Technical Advances
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The management of low rectal cancer is a perennial challenge for colorectal surgeons. The benefits of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in low rectal cancer are to secure the distal margin and avoid surgical space constraints within the deep pelvis. However, anastomotic leak remains an important concern. We report our technique and results combining TaTME with delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) without bowel diversion. First, the splenic flexure, left colon and rectum are laparoscopically mobilized to mid-rectum. TaTME is performed to complete the distal rectal mobilization, and the specimen is delivered transanally and transected. The abdominoperineal colonic pull-through is secured to the anal canal and hypertonic dressing is applied regularly in the ward. The handsewn DCAA is performed one week later. An accompanying video demonstrates this technique. Five consecutive patients with low rectal cancer underwent TaTME with DCAA. All had upfront surgical resection except one who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy. Mean operative duration, blood loss, and length of hospital stay was 290 (250–375) min, 142 (10–200) ml and 11.6 (10–14) days respectively. One patient (20%) suffered a postoperative complication of persistent urinary retention, requiring an indwelling urinary catheter on discharge. There were no cases of open conversion and no instances of anastomotic leakage. Two patients (40%) had minor low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and one (20%) had major LARS. TaTME and DCAA without stoma are complimentary techniques that augment the minimally invasive effects of laparoscopic sphincter-sparing low rectal cancer surgery, with good perioperative outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Sylla P, Knol JJ, D’Andrea AP et al (2021) Urethral injury and other urologic injuries during transanal total mesorectal excision: an international collaborative study. Ann Surg 274:e115–e125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wasmuth HH, Faerden AE, Myklebust TÅ et al (2020) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway. Br J Surg 107:121–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Seow-En I, Seow-Choen F (2020) Comment on: transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been abandoned in Norway. Br J Surg 107:e223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryan OK, Ryan ÉJ, Creavin B et al (2021) Surgical approach for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, robotic and transanal TME approaches. Eur J Surg Oncol 47:285–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roodbeen SX, Penna M, van Dieren S et al (2021) Local recurrence and disease-free survival after transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the International TaTME Registry. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 19(11):1232–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pommergaard HC, Gessler B, Burcharth J, Angenete E, Haglind E, Rosenberg J (2014) Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 16:662–671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Phan K, Oh L, Ctercteko G et al (2019) Does a stoma reduce the risk of anastomotic leak and need for re-operation following low anterior resection for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Oncol 10:179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vogel I, Shinkwin M, van der Storm SL et al (2022) Overall readmissions and readmissions related to dehydration after creation of an ileostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 26:333–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Turnbull RB Jr, Cuthbertson A (1961) Abdominorectal pull-through resection for cancer and for Hirschsprung’s disease. Delayed posterior colorectal anastomosis. Cleve Clin Q 28:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cutait DE, Figliolini FJ (1961) A new method of colorectal anastomosis in abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 4:335–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Biondo S, Trenti L, Espin E et al (2020) Two-stage Turnbull–Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 155:e201625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Portale G, Popesc GO, Parotto M, Cavallin F (2019) Delayed colo-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer: pelvic morbidity, functional results and oncological outcomes: a systematic review. World J Surg 43:1360–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. La Raja C, Foppa C, Maroli A et al (2022) Surgical outcomes of Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis with pull-through versus immediate coloanal anastomosis with diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [published online ahead of print, 2022 Mar 28]. Tech Coloproctol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02601-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Madbouly KM, Emile SH, Gamal AA (2022) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) with delayed coloanal anastomosis versus TaTME with immediate coloanal anastomosis and temporary diversion in middle and low rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 125:865–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin SY, Ow ZGW, Tan DJH et al (2022) Delayed coloanal anastomosis as a stoma-sparing alternative to immediate coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 92:346–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Melka D, Leiritz E, Labiad C et al (2022) Delayed pull-through coloanal anastomosis without temporary stoma: an alternative to the standard manual side-to-end coloanal anastomosis with temporary stoma? A comparative study in 223 patients with low rectal cancer [published online ahead of print, 2022 Jan 29]. Colorectal Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Seow-En I, Seow-Choen F (2018) an initial experience comparing robotic total mesorectal excision (RTME) and transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for low rectal tumours. Ann Acad Med Singap 47:188–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S et al (2019) Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the International TaTME Registry. Ann Surg 269:700–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Seow-En I, Chok AY, Tan EK (2022) Transanal total mesorectal excision with two stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through for delayed low anastomotic leakage—a video vignette. Colorectal Dis 24:331–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ihnát P, Guňková P, Peteja M, Vávra P, Pelikán A, Zonča P (2016) Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection. Surg Endosc 30:4809–4816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Trenti L, Galvez A, Biondo S et al (2018) Quality of life and anterior resection syndrome after surgery for mid to low rectal cancer: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Surg Oncol 44:1031–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There were no sources of funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Seow-En.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article received SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board approval (CIRB no. 2022/2179).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained for all study participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 338636 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seow-En, I., Ng, Y.YR., Tan, I.B.H. et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision and delayed coloanal anastomosis without stoma for low rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 27, 75–81 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02677-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02677-y

Keywords

Navigation