References
Horeman-Franse T (2022) Regarding “loss of seton in patients with complex anal fistula: a retrospective comparison of conventional knotted loose seton and knot-free seton” by Verkade et al. Tech Coloproctol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02637-6
Stellingwerf ME, Bak MT, de Groof EJ, Buskens CJ, Molenaar CB, Gecse KB, Bemelman WA (2020) Knotless seton for perianal fistulas: feasibility and effect on perianal disease activity. Sci Rep 10(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73737-2
Verkade C, Stijns J, Schellekens A, Wasowicz DK, de Vries HS, Zimmerman DDE (2021) Are knot-free setons also trouble-free? Tech Coloproctol 25(8):993–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02488-7
Funding
There was no external funding source.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verkade, C., de Vries, H.S. & Zimmerman, D.D.E. Authors’ reply to the letter about “loss of seton in patients with complex-anal fistula: a retrospective comparison of conventional knotted loose seton and knot-free seton” by Horeman-Franse. Tech Coloproctol 26, 845–846 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02671-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02671-4