References
Sudol-Szopinska I, Santoro GA, Kolodziejczack M, Wiaczek A, Grossi U (2021) Magnetic resonance imaging template to standardize reporting of anal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 25:333–337
Litta F, Parello A, Ferri L, Torrecilla NO, Marra AA, Orefice R, De Simone V, Campennì P, Goglia M, Ratto C (2021) Simple fistula-in–ano:is it all simple? A systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 25(4):385–399
Zinicola R, Cracco N (2017) Anal fistula height: is the proportion of sphincter muscle involved really useful? Colorectal Dis 19:690
Atkin GK, Martins J, Tozer P, Ranchod P, Phillips RKS (2011) For many high anal fistulas, lay open is still good option. Tech Coloproctol 15:143–150
Buchanan GN, Williams AI, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Nicholls RJ, Cohen CRG (2003) Potential clinical implications of direction of a transphincteric anal fistula track. Br J Surg 90:1250–1255
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Not applicable as this is a correspondence article.
Informed consent
Not applicable as this is a correspondence article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zinicola, R., Cracco, N., Del Rio, P. et al. The angle of the anal fistula track and the distance between the internal opening and the anorectal junction: two further useful parameters in MRI?. Tech Coloproctol 26, 323–324 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02483-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02483-y