Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse

  • Video Forum
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS et al (2014 Jan) Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol 123(1):141–148

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ellerkman RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF et al (2001) Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1332–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K et al (2016) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 Apr 30(4):CD004014

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van der Schans EM, Paulides TJC, Wijffels NA, Consten ECJ (2018) Management of patients with rectal prolapse: the 2017 Dutch guidelines. Tech Coloproctol 22(8):589–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1830-1 (Epub 2018 Aug 11)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Iersel JJ, de Witte CJ, Verheijen PM et al (2016) Robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy for multicompartment prolapse of the pelvic floor: a prospective cohort study evaluating functional and sexual outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 59(10):968–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reddy J, Ridgeway B, Gurland B et al (2011) Robotic sacrocolpoperineopexy with ventral rectopexy for the combined treatment of rectal and pelvic organ prolapse: initial report and technique. J Robot Surg 5(3):167–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Panico.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving humans were in accordance with ethical standards of the institutional research committee. Informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Informed consent

All procedures performed in studies involving humans were in accordance with ethical standards of the institutional research committee. Informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 347102 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Campagna, G., Panico, G., Caramazza, D. et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 23, 179–181 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-01940-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-01940-z

Navigation