References
2015 European Society of Coloproctology Collaborating Group (2017) Risk factors for unfavourable postoperative outcome in patients with Crohn’s disease undergoing right hemicolectomy or ileocaecal resection an international audit by ESCP and S-ECCO. Colorectal Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13889
Frasson M, Granero-Castro P, Ramos Rodriguez JL, Flor-Lorente B, Braithwaite M, Marti Martinez E et al (2016) Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:105–145
Bakker IS, Grossmann I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit. Br J Surg 101:424–432. (discussion 3214)
McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 102(5):462–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9697. (Epub 2015 Feb 19. Review)
Ravitch MM, Steichen FM (1979) A stapling instrument for end-to-end inverting anastomosis in the gastrointestinal tract. Ann Surg 189:791–797
Knight CD, Griffen FD (1980) An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler. Surgery 88:710–714
Sujatha-Bhaskar S, Jafari MD, Hanna M, Koh CY, Inaba CS, Mills SD, Carmichael JC, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2018) An endoscopic mucosal grading system is predictive of leak in stapled rectal anastomoses. Surg Endosc 32(4):1769–1775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5860-y. (Epub 2017 Sep 15)
Hübner M, Larson DW, Wolff BG (2012) “How I do it"--radical right colectomy with side-to-side stapled ileo-colonic anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg 16(8):1605–1609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1909-3. (Epub 2012 May 26)
Bingham J, Lallemand M, Barron M, Kuckelman J, Carter P, Blair K, Martin M (2016) Routine intraoperative leak testing for sleeve gastrectomy: is the leak test full of hot air? Am J Surg 211(5):943–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.02.002. (Epub 2016 Feb 23)
Sethi M, Zagzag J, Patel K, Magrath M, Somoza E, Parikh MS, Saunders JK, Ude-Welcome A, Schwack BF, Kurian MS, Fielding GA, Ren-Fielding CJ (2016) Intraoperative leak testing has no correlation with leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 30(3):883–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4286-7. (Epub 2015 Jun 20)
Ricciardi R, Roberts PL, Marcello PW, Hall JF, Read TE, Schoetz DJ (2009) Anastomotic leak testing after colorectal resection: what are the data? Arch Surg 144(5):407–411. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.43. (Discussion 411–2)
Davies AH, Bartolo DC, Richards AE, Johnson CD, McC Mortensen NJ (1988) Intra-operative air testing: an audit on rectal anastomosis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 70:345–347
Beard JD, Nicholson ML, Sayers RD, Lloyd D, Everson NW (1990) Intraoperative air testing of colorectal anastomoses: a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg 77:1095–1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800771006
Smith S, McGeehin W, Kozol RA, Giles D (2007) The efficacy of intraoperative methylene blue enemas to assess the integrity of a colonic anastomosis. BMC Surg 7:15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standard
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Participant provided informed consent prior to participation in the study.
Additional information
The study received no sponsorship.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poskus, T., Luksta, M. & Kryzauskas, M. Technique of air-leak testing of ileocolic anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 22, 813–815 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1882-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1882-2