Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of robotic technology: a survey of practice patterns of the ASCRS Young Surgeons Committee

  • Controversies in Colorectal Surgery
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. YSC members were assumed representative of the young colorectal surgeon population.

References

  1. Gaitanidis A, Simopoulos C, Pitiakoudis M (2018) What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol 22:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1760-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Steele SR, Stein SL, Bordeianou LG, Johnson E, Herzig DO, Champagne BJ (2012) The impact of practice environment on laparoscopic colectomy utilization following colorectal residency: a survey of the ASCRS Young Surgeons. Colorectal Dis 14:374–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stein S, Stulberg J, Champagne B (2012) Learning laparoscopic colectomy during colorectal residency: what does it take and how are we doing? Surg Endosc 26:488–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M (2013) Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc 27:2253–2257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD et al (2013) Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg 37:2782–2790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee MG, Chiu CC, Wang CC et al (2017) Trends and outcomes of surgical treatment for colorectal cancer between 2004 and 2012—an analysis using national inpatient database. Sci Rep 7:2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H et al (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1569–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bolger JC, Broe MP, Zarog MA, Looney A, McKevitt K, Walsh D, Giri S, Peirce C, Coffey JC (2017) Initial experience with a dual-console robotic-assisted platform for training in colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 21:721–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1687-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, Larson DW, Pemberton JH, Cima RR (2012) Technical proficiency in hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery: determining how many cases are required to achieve mastery. Arch Surg 147:317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Disbrow DE, Pannell SM, Shanker BA et al (2018) The effect of formal robotic residency training on the adoption of minimally invasive surgery by young colorectal surgeons. J Surg Educ 75:767–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Kristy Conley and Lisa Aguado in the ASCRS Program Office for their kind support of this work and the authors. The authors acknowledge the following for assistance with design and/ or completing the survey: Anuradha Bhama, Ben Abbadessa, Brian Bello, Carrie Peterson, Daniel Klaristenfeld, David Row, Ellen Bailey, Eric Nelson, Jasna Coralic, Jeffrey Barton, Jennifer Davids, Jennifer Agnew, Lisa Cannon, Leandro Feo, Leander Grimm, Manish Chand, Kellie Mathis, Michael Guzman, Pamela Lee, Samuel Eisenstein, Shafik Sidani, Steven Scarcliff, and Heather Yeo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. S. Keller.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest; they will not reference any off-label or unapproved drugs or products, or use any previously copyrighted material.

Ethical approval

This study used no patient information or protected health information and was exempt from Institutional Review Board approval.

Informed consent

All survey participants were anonymous, no identifying information was collected, and all consented to participation in the project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keller, D.S., Zaghiyan, K. & Mizell, J.S. Use of robotic technology: a survey of practice patterns of the ASCRS Young Surgeons Committee. Tech Coloproctol 22, 715–717 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1862-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1862-6

Keywords

Navigation