Advertisement

Techniques in Coloproctology

, Volume 21, Issue 9, pp 715–720 | Cite as

Healing of the perineal wound after proctectomy in Crohn’s disease patients: only preoperative perineal sepsis predicts poor outcome

  • W. Li
  • L. Stocchi
  • F. Elagili
  • R. P. Kiran
  • S. A. Strong
Original Article

Abstract

Background

The aim of our study was to assess perineal wound healing in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) who undergo proctectomy or proctocolectomy with end ileostomy and to evaluate the influence of various factors including types of perineal dissection on eventual wound healing.

Methods

Data for patients with CD who underwent proctectomy or total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy from 1995 to 2012 were reviewed. The relationship between perineal wound healing and demographics, patient characteristics, and other factors was assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

The perineal wound healed by 12 weeks in 72 (52.9%) out of 136 patients (63.2% female, mean age 41 ± 13 years); delayed healing occurred in 35 patients (25.7%), and in 29 patients (21.3%), there was non-healing. On multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with delayed healing and non-healing was preoperative perineal sepsis (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

After proctectomy or proctocolectomy for CD, perineal wound healing is poor and poses a particular challenge for patients with preoperative perineal sepsis. These findings support a preoperative discussion regarding CD patients that examines potential outcomes and the consideration of measures such as the initial creation of defunctioning ostomy or control/drainage of local sepsis prior to proctectomy.

Keywords

Crohn’s disease Proctectomy Proctocolectomy Perineal wound Healing 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

This manuscript has been seen and approved by all authors. The authors have no conflicts of interest including relevant financial interests, activities, relationships, and affiliations.

Ethical approval

All applicable ethical standards were followed in the conduct of the study and preparation of the manuscript.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Fry RD, Shemesh EI, Kodner IJ, Timmcke A (1989) Technique and results in the management of anal and perianal Crohn’s disease. Surg Gynecol Obster 168:42–48Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Dongen LM, Lubbers EJ (1986) Perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. Arch Surg 121:1187–1190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buchmann P, Keighley MR, Allan RN, Thompson H, Alexander Williams J (1980) Natural history of perineal Crohn’s disease: en year follow up: a plea for conservatism. Am J Surg 168:42–48Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Williamson PR, Hellinger MD, Larach SW, Ferrara A (1995) Twenty-year review of the surgical management of perianal Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 38:389–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Williams JG, Rothenberger DA, Nember FD, Goldberg SM (1991) Fistula in ano in Crohn’s disease. Results of aggressive surgical treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 34:378–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Basu A, Wexner SD (2002) Perianal Crohn’s disease. Curr Treat Options Gasteroenterol 5:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anthony JP, Mathes SJ (1990) The recalcitrant perineal wound after rectal extirpation. Arch Surg 125:1371–1377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Broader JH, Masselink BA, Oates GD, Alexander Williams J (1974) Management of the pelvic space after proctectomy. Br J Surg 61:94–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Irvin TT, Goligher JC (1975) A controlled clinical trial of three different methods of perineal wound management following excision of the rectum. Br J Surg 62:287–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baudot P, Keight MR, Alexander-Williams J (1980) Perineal wound healing after proctectomy for carcinoma and inflammatory disease. Br J Surg 67:275–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lubbers E-JC (1982) Healing of the perineal wound after proctectomy for nonmalignant conditions. Dis Colon Rectum 25:351–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scammell BE, Keighley MR (1986) Delayed perineal wound healing after proctectomy for Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 73:150–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marks CG, Ritchie JK, Todd IP, Wadsworth J (1978) Primary suture of the perineal wound following rectal excision for inflammatory bowel disease. Br J Surg 65:560–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beck DE (2001) Management of anorectal Crohn’s fistulas. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 14:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tompkins RG, Warshaw AL (1985) Improved management of the perineal wound after proctectomy. Ann Surg 202:760–765CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Althumairi AA, Canner JK, Gearhart SL et al (2016) Risk factors for wound complications after abdominoperineal excision: analysis of the ACS NSQIP database. Colorectal Dis 18:0260–0266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Asplund D, Prytz M, Bock D, Haglind E, Angenete E (2015) Persistent perineal morbidity is common following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 30:1563–1570CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Musters GD, Sloothaak DA, Roodbeen S, van Geloven AA, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ (2014) Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a two-centre experience in the era of intensified oncological treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:1151–1157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamamoto T, Bain IM, Allan RN, Keighley MRB (1999) Persistent perineal sinus after proctocolectomy for Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 42:96–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Corman MI, Veidenheimer MC, Coller JA, Ross VH (1978) Perineal wound healing after proctectomy for inflammatory bowel disease. Dis Colon Rectum 21:155–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zeitels JR, Fiddian-Green RG, Dent TL (1984) Intersphincteric proctectomy. Surgery 96:617PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bardot P, Keighley MRB, Alexander-Williams J (1980) Perineal wound healing after proctectomy for carcinoma and inflammatory disease. Br J Surg 67:275–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Dombal FT, Burton I, Goligher JC (1971) The early and late results of surgical treatment for Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 58:805CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bertucci Zoccali M, Biondi A, Krane M et al (2015) Risk factors for wound complications in patients undergoing primary closure of the perineal defect after total proctectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 30:87–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Li
    • 1
  • L. Stocchi
    • 2
  • F. Elagili
    • 2
  • R. P. Kiran
    • 3
  • S. A. Strong
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryGuangzhou First People’s Hospital, Guangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandUSA
  3. 3.Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Medical CenterNew York Presbyterian HospitalNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Division of Gastrointestinal SurgeryDigestive Health CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations