Advertisement

Techniques in Coloproctology

, Volume 21, Issue 9, pp 737–743 | Cite as

A prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating the short-term outcomes of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus tissue-selecting technique

  • A. L. H. Leung
  • T. P. P. Cheung
  • K. Tung
  • Y. P. Tsang
  • H. Cheung
  • C. W. Lau
  • C. N. Tang
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Tissue-selecting technique (TST) is a novel stapled hemorrhoidectomy technique which targets the hemorrhoids, leaving uninvolved mucosal bridges intact and avoiding circumferential circular stapling. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of TST and transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD).

Methods

Patients presenting with symptomatic hemorrhoids were recruited. Patients were randomized into two groups: (1) TST and (2) THD. Patient demographics, perioperative data, postoperative pain scores, recurrence and patient satisfaction scores were evaluated. Patients with acute thrombosed hemorrhoids, external hemorrhoids only, or other concomitant anal diseases were excluded.

Results

From January 2013 to December 2015, 80 patients were included in the study, 40 in each group. There were no significant differences between groups as regards demographic data, perioperative data and postoperative pain scores. The median symptom scores for bleeding and prolapse were significantly lower in the TST group at 1 year (bleeding 1 vs. 2, p = 0.001; prolapse 1 vs. 2, p = 0.025). There was significantly less recurrence requiring reintervention in the TST group (4/40 vs. 17/40, p = 0.001). Satisfaction was significantly greater after TST. The median satisfaction scores after TST and THD were 4 and 3 (on a scale of 1–4; 4 = excellent satisfaction) (p < 0.00001), respectively.

Conclusions

Both THD and TST are safe, and they appear to have similar short-term outcomes; however, TST is associated with better improvement in symptoms, lower recurrence rates and greater patient satisfaction.

Keywords

Hemorrhoids Hemorrhoidectomy Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization Circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy Tissue-selecting technique 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Hong Kong East Cluster Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Authority.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from every patient.

References

  1. 1.
    Johanson JF, Sonnemberg A (1990) The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiological study. Gastroenterology 98:380–386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P (2002) Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 89:1376–1381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Javaraman S, Colquboun PH, Malthane R (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1297–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tjandra JJ, Chan MKY (2007) Systemic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–892CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shao W-J, Li G-CH, Zhang ZH-K, Yang B-L, Sun G-D, Chen Y-Q (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95:147–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R, Ovens L, Nastro P (2009) Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 144:266–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laughlan K, Jayne DG, Jackson D, Rupprecht F, Ribaric G (2009) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan–Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systemic review. Int J Colorectal 24:335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burch J, Epstein D, Baba-Akbari A et al (2009) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systemic review. Colorectal Dis 11:233–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lumb KJ, Colquhoun PHD, Malthaner R, Jayaraman S (2010) Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Libr 2010(9)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th world congress of endoscopic surgery, Rome, Italy, 3–6 June 1998Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gravié JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, Papillon M, Fantoli M, Descottes B, Pessaux P, Amaud JP (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up. Ann Surg 242:29–35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chung CC, Cheung HYS, Chan ESW, Kwok SY, Li MKW (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. Harmonic Scalpel™ hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1213–1219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW (2006) Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 93:226–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pescatori M, Favetta U, Dedola S, Orsini S (1997) Transanal stapled excision of rectal mucosal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 1:96–98Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pescatori M, Gagliardi G (2008) Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol 12:7–19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin HC, Ren DL, He QL, Peng H, Xie SK, Su D, Wang XX (2012) Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade III-IV prolapsing hemorrhoids: a two-year prospective controlled study. Tech Coloproctol 16:337–343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin HC, He QL, Ren DL, Peng H, Xie SK, Su D, Wang XX (2012) Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a minimally invasive technique for hemorrhoids. Surg Today 42:868–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin HC, Lian L, Xie SK, Peng H, Tai JD, Ren DL (2013) The tissue-selecting technique: segmental stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 56:1320–1324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda T (1995) A novel therapy for internal haemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 90:610–613PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sohn N, Aronoff JS, Cohen FS, Weinstein MA (2001) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization is an alternative to operative hemorrhoidectomy. Am J Surg 182:515–519CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bursics A, Morvay K, Kupcsulik P, Flautner L (2004) Comparison of early and 1-year follow-up results of conventional hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoid artery ligation: a randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:176–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, Zaman S, Gravante G (2009) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1665–1671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ratto C, Giordano P, Donisi L, Parello A, Litta F, Doglietto GB (2011) Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for selected fourth-degree haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 15:191–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zampieri N, Castellani R, Andreoli R, Geccherle A (2012) Long-term results and quality of life in patients treated with hemorrhoidectomy using two different techniques: ligasure versus transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization. Am J Surg 104:684–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elmér SE, Nygren JO, Lenander CE (2013) A randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 56:484–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    De Nardi P, Capretti G, Corsaro A, Staudacher C (2014) A prospective, randomized trial comparing the short- and long-term results of doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy versus excision hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 57(3):348–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ratto C, Parello A, Veronese E, Cudazzo E, D’Agostino E, Pagano C, Cavazzoni E, Brugnano L, Litta F (2014) Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for haemorrhoids: results from a multicentre trial. Colorectal Dis 17:O10–O19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Giordano P, Nastro P, Davies A, Gravante G (2011) Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes. Tech Coloproctol 15:67–73CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Festen S, van Hoogstraten MJ, van Geloven AAW, Gerhards MF (2009) Treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoidal disease with PPH or THD. A randomized trial on postoperative complications and short-term results. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1401–1405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tsang YP, Fok KL, Cheung YS, Li KW, Tang CN (2014) Comparison of transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation and stapled haemorrhoidopexy in management of haemorrhoidal disease: a retrospective study and literature review. Tech Coloproctol 18:1017–1022CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sajid MS, Parampalli U, Whitehouse P, Sains P, McFall MR, Baig MK (2012) A systemic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 16:1–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Infantino A, Altomare DF, Bottini C, Bonanno M, Mancini S, THD group of the SICCR (2011) Prospective randomized multicentre study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third-degree haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 14:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Simillis C, Thoukididou SN, Slesser AAP, Rasheed S, Tan E, Tekkis PP (2015) Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes and effectiveness of surgical treatments for haemorrhoids. BJS 102:1603–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lin HC, Luo HX, Zbar AP, Xie SK, Lian L, Ren DL, Wang JP (2014) The tissue selecting technique (TST) versus the Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: a retrospective case-control study. Tech Coloproctol 18:739–744CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang ZG, Zhang Y, Zeng XD, Zhang TH, Zhu QD, Liu DL, Qiao YY, Mu N, Yin ZT (2015) Clinical observations on the treatment of prolapsing hemorrhoids with tissue selecting therapy. World J Gastroenterol 21:2490–2496CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brown SR, Tiernan JP, Watson AJM et al (2016) Haemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree haemorrhoids (HubBLe): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388:356–364CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Watson AJM, Hudson J, Wood J, Kilonzo M, Brown SR, McDonald A, Norrie J, Bruhn H, Cook JA, on behalf of the eTHoS study group (2016) Comparison of stapled haemorrhoidopexy with traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388:2375–2385CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jeong H, Hwang S, Ryu KO, Lim J, Kim HT, Yu HM, Yoon J, Lee J-Y, Kim HR, Choi YG (2017) Early experience with a partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy for treating patients with grades III–IV prolapsing hemorrhoids. Ann Coloproctol 33(1):28–34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lehur PA, Didne´e AS, Faucheron J-L, Meurette G, Zerbib P, Siproudhis L, Vinson-Bonnet B, Dubois A, Casa C, Hardouin J-B, Durand-Zaleski I, on behalf of the LigaLongo Study Group (2016) Cost-effectiveness of new surgical treatments for hemorrhoidal disease. A multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing transanal Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy and circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Ann Surg 264(5):710–716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schuurman JP, Borel Rinkes IH, Go PM (2012) Hemorrhoidal artery ligation procedure with or without Doppler transducer in grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease: a blinded randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 255:840–845CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. L. H. Leung
    • 1
  • T. P. P. Cheung
    • 1
  • K. Tung
    • 1
  • Y. P. Tsang
    • 1
  • H. Cheung
    • 1
  • C. W. Lau
    • 1
  • C. N. Tang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryPamela Youde Nethersole Eastern HospitalChai WanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations