Factors associated with hospital readmission following diverting ileostomy creation
- 365 Downloads
The creation of a diverting loop ileostomy is associated with the risk of readmission due to stoma-related complications. We hypothesized that the assessment of our institution-specific readmissions following ileostomy creation would help identifying at-risk groups which should be the focus of future preventative strategies.
Patients who underwent loop ileostomy formation from 2009 to 2013 were reviewed. We evaluated readmissions within 30 days after discharge following loop ileostomy construction. Possible associations between readmission and demographic, disease-related and treatment-related factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.
Out of 1267 patients undergoing loop ileostomy construction, 163 patients (12.9%) were readmitted. The main causes of readmissions were organ/space infections (43, 3.4%), small bowel obstruction/ileus (42, 3.3%) and dehydration (38, 3%). Independent factors associated with overall readmission were cardiovascular (OR = 2.0) and renal comorbidity (OR = 2.9), preoperative chemo/radiotherapy (OR = 4.0), laparoscopic approach (OR = 1.7) and longer operative time (OR = 1.2). Cancer diagnosis was associated with reduced readmission rates (OR = 0.2). Independent factors associated with readmission due to dehydration were chemo/radiotherapy (OR = 4.7) and laparoscopic approach (OR = 2.6).
Dehydration associated with diverting ileostomy creation was relevant as an individual cause of readmission, but its overall incidence was relatively rare. Dedicated strategies to prevent dehydration should be directed to patients who received chemoradiotherapy and/or laparoscopic surgery.
KeywordsReadmission Diverting ileostomy Educational ileostomy pathways
All authors made substantial contributions to concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article and revising the article critically. All authors approve of the final version to be published.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All applicable ethical standards were adhered to in the performance of this study and creation of the submitted manuscript.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 13.Aspenson M, Hazary S (2012) The clock is ticking on readmission penalties. Healthc Financ Manag 66:58–63Google Scholar
- 16.Shepperd S, Lannin NA, Clemson LM, McCluskey A, Cameron ID, Barras SL (2013) Discharge planning from hospital to home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD000313Google Scholar
- 18.(2013) Readmission reduction has begun and the penalties will escalate. Hosp Case Manag 21:45–7Google Scholar
- 20.Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW (2003) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46:851–859CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Erkek AB, Remzi FH, Hammel JP, Akyuz M, Fazio VW (2008) Effect of small bowel obstruction on functional outcome and quality of life in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: 10-year follow-up study. Gastroenterology 23:119–125Google Scholar
- 29.Younis J, Salerno G, Fanto D, Hadjipavlou M, Chellar D, Trickett JP (2012) Focused preoperative patient stoma education, prior to ileostomy formation after anterior resection, contributes to a reduction in delayed discharge within the enhanced recovery programme. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:43–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Mary RK, Sarah WG, Ann CL et al (2016) Education program for prevention of ileostomy complications (EPPIC): a randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 223(Supplement 2):e7–e8Google Scholar