Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of body posture on defecation: a prospective study of “The Thinker” position

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We hypothesized that bending the upper body into what we have termed “The Thinker” position facilitates defecation. This study aimed to assess the influence of “The Thinker” position on defecation.

Methods

This is the prospective single-group study. Patients who could not evacuate the paste in normal sitting position on cinedefecography between January and June 2013 were enrolled in this study. Cinedefecography was first performed in the sitting position; if the patient was unable to evacuate the paste, images were obtained in “The Thinker” position. Patients who were able to evacuate the paste were excluded from the study. Anorectal angle (ARA), perineal plane distance (PPD), and puborectalis length (PRL) during straining in both positions were measured from the radiographs.

Results

Twenty-two patients unable to evacuate the barium paste underwent cinedefecography in “The Thinker” position. Seventeen patients were female, average age of 56 (range 22–76) years. “The Thinker” position had significantly wider ARA than the sitting position (113° vs. 134°, respectively; p = 0.03), larger PPD (7.1 vs. 9.3 cm, respectively; p = 0.02), and longer PRL (12.9 vs. 15.2 cm, respectively; p = 0.005) during straining. Eleven patients could evacuate completely in “The Thinker” position.

Conclusion

“The Thinker” position seems to be a more efficient method for defecation than the sitting position. This technique may be helpful when retraining patients with constipation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sikirov D (2003) Comparison of straining during defecation in three positions: results and implications for human health. Dig Dis Sci 48:1201–1205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rad S (2002) Impact of ethnic habit on defecographic measurements. Arch Iran Med 5:115–117

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tsuchino M, Yamashita K, Boda T et al (2008) A study of the relationship between continence function and defecatory posture. J Jpn Soc Stoma Cont Rehabil 24:34–38

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drossman DA (2006) The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process. Gastroenterology 130:1377–1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jorge JM, Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Rosato GO, Sullivan ML, Jagelman DG (1992) How reliable are currently available methods of measuring the anorectal angle? Dis Colon Rectum 35:332–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Felt-Bersma RJ, Luth WJ, Janssen JJ, Meuwissen SG (1990) Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders. Which findings are clinically relevant? Dis Colon Rectum 33:277–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jorge JM, Ger GC, Gonzalez Wexmer SD (1994) Patient position during cinedefecography. Influence on perineal descent and other measurements. Dis Colon Rectum 37:927–931

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jorge JM, Wexner SD, Ehrenpreis ED, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG (1993) Does perineal descent correlate with pudendal neuropathy? Dis Colon Rectum 36:475–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Habib FI, Corazziari E, Viscardi Badiali D, Torsoli A (1992) Role of body position, gender, and age on pelvic floor location and mobility. Dig Dis Sci 37:500–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Haubruch W (1985) Constipation. In: Berk J (ed) Bockus gastroenterology, 4th edn, Saunders, Philadelphia, p 111

  11. Boles R (1927) Constipation. JAMA 89:1766–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singer C (1958) History of technology. The industrial revolution, Oxford, pp 507–508

  13. Tagart RE (1966) The anal canal and rectum: their varying relationship and its effect on anal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 9:449–452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Veglia A, Guglielmi A, Sallustio PL, Tripoli G (2001) Contribution of posture to the maintenance of anal continence. Int J Colorectal Dis 16:51–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rao SS, Kavlock R, Rao S (2006) Influence of body position and stool characteristics on defecation in humans. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2790–2796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Martelli H, Devroede G, Arhan P, Duguay C (1978) Mechanisms of idiopathic constipation: outlet obstruction. Gastroenterology 75:623–631

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Parks A (1975) Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med 68:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parks AG, Porter NH, Hardcastle J (1966) The syndrome of the descending perineum. Proc R Soc Med 59:477–482

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Preston D (1983) Neuropathology of stow-transit constipation. Gut 24:997A

    Google Scholar 

  20. Swash M (1988) Pelvic floor outlet and sphincter disorders. Ital J Gastroenterol 20:344–347

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alves-Ferreira PC, Gurland B, Zutshi M, Hull T (2012) Perineal descent does not imply a more severe clinical disorder. Colorectal Dis 14:1372–1379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Takano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takano, S., Sands, D.R. Influence of body posture on defecation: a prospective study of “The Thinker” position. Tech Coloproctol 20, 117–121 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1402-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1402-6

Keywords

Navigation