Abstract
Background
There is disagreement amongst surgeons about the use of oral mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) prior to low anterior resection with diverting ileostomy. Colonic transit in the early post-operative period is an important factor in determining the role of MBP, as propagation of any stool remaining in the defunctioned colon may exacerbate morbidity in the event of anastomotic leak. We studied colonic transit time in the first 7 days following low anterior resection with diverting ileostomy.
Methods
We conducted a prospective observational study of patients with rectal cancer undergoing elective low anterior resection with diverting ileostomy in a tertiary colorectal unit. Twenty radio-opaque markers were inserted into the caecum via the distal limb of the loop ileostomy at surgery. Plain abdominal radiographs were taken on post-operative days 1, 3 and 5. The primary endpoint was passage of the markers to the neorectum. Data were collected on treatment, return of gastrointestinal function and complications.
Results
Twenty-two patients (mean age 68.5 years; 18 males) participated in the study. In 20 patients, all markers remained in the right colon on day 7. Three markers were present in the left colon in one patient, and eight markers were present in the neorectum in another patient, on the seventh day.
Conclusions
Colonic transit may be abolished by the presence of diverting ileostomy. It should now be established whether clearance of the left colon alone, using enemas, is sufficient for patients undergoing low anterior resection, thus avoiding the morbidity associated with oral MBP.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R, Wolff S, Koeckerling F, Lippert H, Working Group’ Colon/Rectum Carcinoma’ (2005) Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 92:1137–1142
Huser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248:52–60
Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS, Fenech DS, McLeod RS, Best Practice in General Surgery C (2010) Preoperative bowel preparation for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: a clinical practice guideline endorsed by the Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Can J Surg 53:385–395
Bretagnol F, Panis Y, Rullier E et al (2010) Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation: the French GRECCAR III multicenter single-blinded randomized trial. Ann Surg 252:863–868
Van’t Sant HP, Weidema WF, Hop WC, Oostvogel HJ, Contant CM (2010) The influence of mechanical bowel preparation in elective lower colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 251:59–63
Nicholson GA, Finlay IG, Diament RH, Molloy RG, Horgan PG, Morrison DS (2011) Mechanical bowel preparation does not influence outcomes following colonic cancer resection. Br J Surg 98:866–871
Guenaga KF, Matos D, Wille-Jorgensen P (2011) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001544
Gravante G, Caruso R, Andreani SM, Giordano P (2008) Mechanical bowel preparation for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis on abdominal and systemic complications on almost 5000 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1145–1150
Cao F, Li J, Li F (2012) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:803–810
Augestad KM, Lindsetmo RO, Reynolds H et al (2011) International trends in surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Am J Surg 201:353–357
Andersen J, Thorup J, Wille-Jorgensen P (2011) Use of preoperative bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery in Denmark remains high. Dan Med Bull 58:A4313
Sasaki J, Matsumoto S, Kan H et al (2012) Objective assessment of postoperative gastrointestinal motility in elective colonic resection using a radiopaque marker provides an evidence for the abandonment of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation. J Nippon Med Sch 79:259–266
Villarreal J, Sood M, Zangen T et al (2001) Colonic diversion for intractable constipation in children: colonic manometry helps guide clinical decisions. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 33:588–591
Hallgren T, Oresland T, Cantor P, Fasth S, Hulten L (1995) Intestinal intraluminal continuity is a prerequisite for the distal bowel motility response to feeding. Scand J Gastroenterol 30:554–561
Freise H, Fischer LG (2009) Intestinal effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 22:644–648
van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218
Bassotti G, de Roberto G, Castellani D, Sediari L, Morelli A (2005) Normal aspects of colorectal motility and abnormalities in slow transit constipation. World J Gastroenterol 11:2691–2696
Theophilus MHS, Cui J, Bell S, Warrier S (2014) Colonic motility is abolished following diverting loop ileostomy (abstr.). Colorectal Dis 16(Supplement 2):22
Evans RC, Kamm MA, Hinton JM, Lennard-Jones JE (1992) The normal range and a simple diagram for recording whole gut transit time. Int J Colorectal Dis 7:15–17
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr Elizabeth Wlodek and Mr Nikolaos Chatzizacharias who assisted in patient recruitment and data collection. They would also like to thank Mr Richard Miller, Mr Justin Davies, Mr Michael Powar and Mr Andrew Clark who supported the study through patient recruitment and carrying out the study intervention. The additional plain radiographs required for this study were funded by a grant from the Addenbrooke’s Charitable Trust. The cost of the markers used was borne by the Cambridge Colorectal Research Fund.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
J. M. Ali and S. G. Rajaratnam have contributed equally to this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ali, J.M., Rajaratnam, S.G., Upponi, S. et al. Colonic transit in the empty colon after defunctioning ileostomy: Do we really know what happens?. Tech Coloproctol 19, 165–172 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1278-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1278-5