Skip to main content
Log in

Initial experience with a variable width and extreme tip angulation colonoscope

  • Technical Advances
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Wagh M (2012) Ultrathin-caliber colonoscopy: is thin truly in? Gastrointest Endosc 75:492–493

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sola-Vera J, Uceda F, Brotons A et al (2011) Does the use of a variable stiffness colonoscope offer advantages during colonoscopy under deep sedation? Results of a randomized trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:593–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Othman MO, Bradley AG, Choudhary A et al (2009) Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 41:17–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Luo DJY, Hui AJ, Yan KK et al (2012) A randomized comparison of ultrathin and standard colonoscope in cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance. Gastrointest Endosc 75:484–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Töx U, Schumacher B, Toermer T et al (2013) Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study. Endoscopy 45:439–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al (1997) Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112:24–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA et al (2010) The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology 139:1128–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DeMarco DC, Odstrcil E, Lara LF et al (2010) Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. Gastrointest Endosc 71:542–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson JC, Walker G, Birk JW et al (2007) Tapered colonsocope performs better than the pediatric colonoscope in female patients: a direct comparison through tandem colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 65:1042–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lurix E, Hernandez AV, Thoma M, Castro F (2012) Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time, or modified queue position. Gastrointest Endosc 75:827–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. F. Lara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lara, L.F., Erim, T., Schneider, A. et al. Initial experience with a variable width and extreme tip angulation colonoscope. Tech Coloproctol 18, 1173–1175 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1223-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1223-z

Keywords

Navigation