Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The role of loose seton in the management of anal fistula: a multicenter study of 200 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Perianal abscesses and fistulae-in-ano are a common anorectal complaint causing significant distress to patients, and present a considerable treatment challenge. Principal of treatment is achieving closure of the fistula while maintaining continence. There are numerous treatment approaches with large debate about which method is “ideal.” Our aim was to assess the tolerance and efficacy of loose seton placement in the treatment for fistula-in-ano.

Methods

We performed a retrospective multicenter review of the management of anal fistulae with loose seton placement over a three-year period. All patients underwent a standardized procedure, and were rescheduled for an elective change of seton until fistula resolution. Patients’ demographics, medical history, comorbidities, overall number and time interval between seton placements, tolerance, and morbidity of the procedure were recorded.

Results

A total of 200 consecutive patients had loose seton placement. 69.5 % (n = 139) were males, and mean age was 42.6 years. The median number of setons required for each patient was 3 (range 1–8; mean 2.84). The mean interval between changes was 3.08 months (range 2–4 months). All patients had successful clearance of fistula. The procedure was well tolerated in 96 % of patients (n = 187). Only 1 % (n = 2) could not tolerate the presence of seton due to significant discomfort. Fistula recurrence rate was 6 % (n = 12).

Conclusions

Recently, newer treatment modalities have been reported with enthusiasm. However, there remains a lack of strong statistical evidence of efficacy to support their use. Overall, loose seton placement remains a well-tolerated, pragmatic low-cost solution to this common and difficult condition as evident by our study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Malik AI, Nelson RL (2008) Surgical management of anal fistulae: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 10:420–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson RL (2002) Anorectal abscess fistula: what do we know. Surg Clin North Am 82:1139–1151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zanotti C, Martinez-Puente C, Pascual I, Pascual M, Hereros D, Garcia-Olmo D (2007) An assessment of the incidence of fistula-in-ano in four countries of the European Union. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1459–1462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Subhas G, Bhullar JS, Al-Omari A, Unawane A, Mittal VK, Pearlman R (2012) Setons in the treatment of anal fistula: review of variations in materials and techniques. Dig Surg 29:292–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitalas LE, van Wijk JJ, Gosselink MP, Doornebosch P, Zimmerman DE, Schouten WR (2010) Seton drainage prior to transanal advancement flap repair: useful or not? Int J Colorectal Dis 25:1499–1502

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hermann G, Defosses L (1880) Sur la muquese de la region cloacale du rectum. Comptes End Acad Des Sci 90:1301–1302

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lockhart-Mummery JP (1929) Discussion on fistula-in-ano. Proc R Soc Med 22:1331

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon-Watson C, Dodd H (1935) Observation on fistula in ano in relation to perianal intramuscular glands with report of three cases. Br J Surg 22:703–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eisenhammer S (1956) The internal anal sphincter and the anorectal abscess. Surg Gynecol Obstet 103:501–506

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sileri P, Cadeddu F, D’Ugo S et al (2011) Surgery for fistula-in-ano in a specialist colorectal unit: a critical appraisal. BMC Gastroenterol 11:120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams JG, Farrands PA, Williams AB et al (2007) The treatment of anal fistula: aCPGBI position statement. Colorectal Dis 9:18–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dudukgian H, Abcarian H (2011) Why do we have so much trouble treating anal fistula. World J Gastroenterol 17:3292–3296

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. George Pinedo M, Gino Caselli M, Gonzalo Urrejola L et al (2010) Modified loose-seton technique for treatment of complex anal fistula. Colorectal Dis 12:310–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Memon AA, Murtaza G, Azami R, Zafar H, Chawla T, Laghari AA (2011) Treatment of complex fistula in ano with cable-tie seton: a prospective case series. ISRN Surgery 2011:636952

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Garcia Aguillar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, Madof RD (1996) Anal fistula surgery: factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39:723–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vasilevsky CA, Gordon PH (1984) The incidence of recurrent abscesses or fistula-in-ano following anorectal suppuration. Dis Colon Rectum 27:126–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lim CH, Shin HKS, Kang WH et al (2012) The use of a staged drainage seton for the treatment of anal fistulae or fistulous abscesses. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28:309–314

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ritchie RD, Sackier JM, Hodde JP (2009) Incontinence rates after cutting seton treatment for anal fistula. Colorectal Dis 11:564–571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Abcarian H (2011) Anorectal infection: abscess-Fistula. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24:14–21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Buchanan G, Owen H, Torkington J, Luniss P, Nicholls RJ, Cohen R (2004) Long-term outcome following loose-seton technique for external sphincter preservation in complex anal fistula. Br J Surg 91:476–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lentner A, Wienert C (1996) Long-term indwelling setons for low transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistulas. Experience with 108 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1097–1101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Garcia Olmo D, Vasquez PA, Lopez JF (1994) Multiple seton in treatment of high peri-anal fistula. Br J Surg 81:136–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Joy HA, Williams JG (2002) The outcome of surgery for complex anal fistulas. Colorectal Dis 4:254–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Morelli U et al (2013) The treatment of anal fistulas with biologically derived products: is innovation better than conventional surgical treatment? An update. Tech Coloproctol 17:259–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jurczak F, Laridon JY, Raffaitin P, Redon Y, Pousset JP (2009) Long-term follow-up of the treatment of high anal fistulas using fibrin glue. J Chir 146:1167–1174

    Google Scholar 

  27. Loungnarath R, Dietz DW, Mutch MG, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW (2004) Fibrin glue treatment of complex anal fistula has low success rates. Dis Colon Rectum 47:432–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Adams T, Yang J, Kondylis PD (2008) Long-term outlook after successful fibrin glue ablation of cryptoglandular transsphincteric fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1488–1490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland

    M. E. Kelly, H. M. Heneghan, F. D. McDermott, G. J. Nason, C. Freeman, S. T. Martin & D. C. Winter

Authors
  1. M. E. Kelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. M. Heneghan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. D. McDermott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. J. Nason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Freeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. T. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. D. C. Winter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. E. Kelly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kelly, M.E., Heneghan, H.M., McDermott, F.D. et al. The role of loose seton in the management of anal fistula: a multicenter study of 200 patients. Tech Coloproctol 18, 915–919 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1186-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1186-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation