Advertisement

Techniques in Coloproctology

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 305–308 | Cite as

Reinforcement of closure of stoma site using a biological mesh

  • A. Bhangu
  • K. Futaba
  • A. Patel
  • T. Pinkney
  • D. Morton
Technical Note

Abstract

Incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure is an under-reported problem, having been recently shown to occur in up to 30 % of patients. This technical note describes a technique for the placement of intraperitoneal biological mesh to prophylactically reinforce stoma closure sites. Seven consecutive patients underwent mesh placement as part of a pilot study. Following closure of the stoma through a trephine incision, 6 anchoring sutures were placed between the peritoneum/deep fascia and the edges of the mesh circumferentially. The mesh was delivered into the peritoneal cavity and parachuted up against the abdominal wall, and the sutures tied. If closure was performed through a midline laparotomy, the anchoring sutures were placed in a similar fashion through the midline incision. The fascia above the mesh and soft tissues was then closed. The mesh was successfully placed in all 7 patients. Follow-up at 30 days showed one superficial wound infection. An ultrasound scan of this patient revealed that the mesh was still in place and that the infection did not breach the fascia. No other early adverse events occurred. Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement of stoma closure sites is technically feasible and safe in the short term. Longer-term results from a prospective randomised trial are needed, including clinical and radiological assessment for hernia rates, to establish what if any are the realisable benefits of this technique.

Keywords

Incisional hernia Stoma Biologic mesh Biologic tissue matrix Acellular dermal matrix 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Collaborating members of the West Midlands Research Collaborative: David Bartlett, Nick Battersby, Elizabeth Hepburn, Paul Marriott, Pritesh Mistry, Henrietta Poon, Caroline Richardson, Andrew Torrance, Lisa Whisker and the Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit.

Conflict of interest

The mesh was provided free of charge by Lifecell Corporation for the pilot study to establish a standardised technique, as part of their ongoing support of the independently run ROCSS trial (a randomised controlled trial of prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement of closed stoma sites to prevent incisional hernia). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Bhangu A, Nepogodiev D, Futaba K (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure. World J Surg 36:973–983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A, Aktan AO (2006) Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1559–1563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guzman-Valdivia G (2008) Incisional hernia at the site of a stoma. Hernia 12:471–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schreinemacher MH, Vijgen GH, Dagnelie PC, Bloemen JG, Huizinga BF, Bouvy ND (2011) Incisional hernias in temporary stoma wounds: a cohort study. Arch Surg 146:94–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhangu A, Fletcher L, Kingdon S, Smith E, Nepogodiev D, Janjua U (2012) A clinical and radiological assessment of incisional hernias following closure of temporary stomas. Surgeon 10(6):321–325. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2012.01.001 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wijeyekoon SP, Gurusamy K, El-Gendy K, Chan CL (2010) Prevention of parastomal herniation with biologic/composite prosthetic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg 211:637–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schuster R, Singh J, Safadi BY, Wren SM (2006) The use of acellular dermal matrix for contaminated abdominal wall defects: wound status predicts success. Am J Surg 192:594–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB et al (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Bhangu
    • 1
  • K. Futaba
    • 1
  • A. Patel
    • 1
  • T. Pinkney
    • 1
  • D. Morton
    • 1
  1. 1.Academic Department of SurgeryQueen Elizabeth HospitalEdgbaston, BirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations