Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Obstructed defecation: the role of anorectal manometry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of anorectal manometry (AM) in patients affected by obstructed defecation (OD).

Methods

Between January 2007 and December 2010, 379 patients (287 women and 92 men) affected by OD were evaluated. After a preliminary clinical evaluation, defecography and AM were performed. The results were compared with those from 20 healthy control subjects.

Results

Overall anal resting pressure was not significantly different between patients and controls. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) data were significantly lower when compared with those of controls (P < 0.01). The straining test was considered positive in 143 patients. No significant difference was noted between patients and controls in maximal tolerated volume data. Patients had a significantly higher conscious rectal sensitivity threshold than controls (P < 0.02).

Conclusions

A positive straining test, low MVC and impaired rectal sensation are the main abnormalities detected by AM in patients with OD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartolo D, Roe A (1986) Obstructed defaecation. Br J Hosp Med 35:228–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Khaikin M, Wexner SD (2006) Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. World J Gastroenterol 28:3168–3173

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pucciani F, Raggioli M, Ringressi MN (2011) Obstructed defecation: what is the role of rehabilitation? Colorectal Dis. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02644.x

  4. Andromanakos N, Skandalakis P, Troupis T, Fillippou D (2006) Constipation of anorectal outlet obstruction: pathophysiology, evaluation and management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:638–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rasmussen OO, Sørensen M, Tetzschener T, Christiansen J (1993) Dynamic anal manometry in the assessment of patients with obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 36:901–907

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Azpiroz Z, Enck P, Whitehead WE (2002) Anorectal functioning testing: review of collective experience. Am J Gastroenterol 97:232–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Siproudhis L, Eléouet M, Desformeaux V et al (2009) Diagnosis of dyschezia. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 33:F68–F74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rao SSC, Singh S (2010) Clinical utility of colonic and anorectal manometry in chronic constipation. J Clin Gastroenterol 44:597–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bharucha AE, Wald A, Enck P, Rao S (2006) Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology 130:1510–1518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Altomare DF, Spazzafumo L, Rinaldi M et al (2008) Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Colorectal Dis 10:84–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Piloni V, Genovesi N, Grassi R et al (1993) National working team report on defecography. Radiol Med 85:784–793 [article in Italian]

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pucciani F, Rottoli ML, Bologna A et al (1996) Anterior rectocele and anorectal dysfunction. Int J Colorectal Dis 11:1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Martelli H, Devroede G, Arhan P et al (1978) Some parameters of large bowel motility in normal man. Gastroenterology 75:612–618

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pescatori M (2003) Rectoceles and the “iceberg syndrome”. Urodinamica 13:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pescatori M, Spyrou M, Pulvirenti d’Urso A (2006) A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the “iceberg diagram”. Colorectal Dis 8:785–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Seide B et al (2005) Phenotypic variation in functional disorders of defecation. Gastroenterology 128:1199–1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hompes R, Harmston C, Wijffels N et al. (2011) Excellent response rate of anismus to Botulinum toxin if rectal prolapse misdiagnosed as anismus (“pseudoanismus”) is excluded. Colorectal Dis. doi:10.1111/j.14631318.2011.02561.x

  19. Jost WH, Schrank B, Herold A, Leiss O (1999) Functional outlet obstruction: anismus, spastic pelvic floor syndrome, and dyscoordination of the voluntary sphincter muscles. Definition, diagnosis, and treatment from the neurologic point of view. Scand J Gastroenterol 34:449–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bellini M, Rappelli L, Alduini P et al (2003) Pelvic floor dyssynergia and psychiatric disorders. Does the snake bite its tail? Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 49:135–139

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hong Ho Y, Tan M, Su Goh H (1996) Clinical and physiologic effects of biofeedback in outlet obstruction constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 39:520–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pucciani F, Rottoli ML, Bologna A et al (1998) Pelvic floor dyssynergia and bimodal rehabilitation: results of combined pelviperineal kinesitherapy and biofeedback training. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:124–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gladman MA, Lunniss PJ, Scott SM, Swash M (2006) Rectal hyposensitivity. Am J Gastroenterol 101:1140–1151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scott SM, van den Berg MM, Benninga MA (2011) Rectal sensorimotor dysfunction in constipation. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 25:103–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical and Surgical Critical Care, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Firenze, Italy

    F. Pucciani & M. N. Ringressi

Authors
  1. F. Pucciani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. N. Ringressi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Pucciani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pucciani, F., Ringressi, M.N. Obstructed defecation: the role of anorectal manometry. Tech Coloproctol 16, 67–72 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0800-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0800-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation