A systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to systematically analyse the clinical trials on the effectiveness of transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation (THD) and stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the management of haemorrhoidal disease (HD).

Methods

Clinical trials on the effectiveness of THD and SH in the management of HD were analysed systematically using RevMan®, and combined outcomes were expressed as risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD).

Results

Three randomised, controlled trials encompassing 150 patients were analysed systematically. There were 80 THD patients and 70 SH patients. There was no significant heterogeneity (P = 0.40) among included trials. Therefore, in the fixed effects model, THD and SH were statistically equivalent in terms of treatment success rate (P = 0.19), operation time (P = 0.55), postoperative complications (P = 0.11) and recurrence (P = 0.46) of HD. THD was associated with significantly less postoperative pain (MD, −2.00; 95% CI, −2.06, −1.94; z = 63.59; P < 0.00001) compared to SH.

Conclusions

Both THD and SH are equally effective and can be attempted for the management of HD. However, THD is associated with significantly lesser postoperative pain and therefore may be considered a preferred procedure. This conclusion is based only on treating 150 patients by THD or SH in three moderate-quality randomised trials. A major, multicenter, randomised trial is required to validate this conclusion and investigate other variables like hospital stay, cost-effectiveness and health-related quality of life measurement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. 1.

    Dal Monte PP, Tagariello C, Saragò M et al (2007) Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation: nonexcisional surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 11:333–338

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1297–1305

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Carapeti EA, Kamm MA, McDonald PJ, Phillips RK (1998) Double-blind randomised controlled trial of effect of metronidazole on pain after day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 351:169–172

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P (2002) Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 89(11):1376–1381

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wrobleski DE, Corman ML, Veidenheimer MC, Coller JAL (1980) Long-term evaluation of rubber ring ligation in hemorrhoidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 23:478–482

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Farag EA (1978) Pile suture: a new technique for treatment of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 65:293–295

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Awojobi OA (1983) Modified pile suture in the outpatient treatment of haemorrhoids: a preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum 26:96–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Serdev N (1990) The surgical treatment of haemorrhoids: their suturing ligation without excision. Khirusgiia 43:65–68

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Schulte T, Fändrich F, Kahlke V (2008) Life-threatening rectal necrosis after injection sclerotherapy for haemorrhoids. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:725–726

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Marques CF, Nahas SC, Nahas CS, Sobrado CW Jr, Habr-Gama A, Kiss DR (2006) Early results of the treatment of internal hemorrhoid disease by infrared coagulation and elastic banding: a prospective randomized cross-over trial. Tech Coloproctol 10:312–317

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ricci MP, Matos D, Saad SS (2008) Rubber band ligation and infrared photocoagulation for the outpatient treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Acta Cir Bras 23:102–106

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gupta PJ (2007) Infra red photocoagulation of early grades of hemorrhoids—5-year follow-up study. Bratisl Lek Listy 108:223–226

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tajana A, Chiurazzi D, De Lorenzi I (1995) Infrared photocoagulation, cryosurgery and laser surgery in hemorrhoidal disease. Ann Ital Chir 66:775–782

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Longo A (1998) Treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th world congress of endoscopic surgery, Monduzzi Editore, Bologna, pp 777–784

  15. 15.

    Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendáriz P, De Miguel M (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 48:809–815

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sakr MF, Moussa MM (2010) LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1161–1167

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gravié JF, Lehur PA, Huten N et al (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up. Ann Surg 242:29–35

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthane R et al (2006) Stapled versus conventional surgery for haemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD005393. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005393.pub2

  19. 19.

    Seow-Choen F (2001) Stapled haemorrhoidectomy: pain or gain. Br J Surg 88:1–3

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda T (1995) A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 90:610–613

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sohn N, Aronoff JS, Cohen FS, Wernstein MA (2001) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization is an alternative to operative hemorrhoidectomy. Am J Surg 182:515–519

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Faucheron JL, Poncet G, Voirin D, Badic B, Gangner Y (2011) Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair (HAL-RAR) for the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoids: long-term results in 100 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 54:226–231

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ratto C, Donisi L, Parello A et al (2010) Evaluation of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization as a minimally invasive therapeutic approach to hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 53:803–811

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Theodoropoulos GE, Sevrisarianos N, Papaconstantinou J et al (2010) Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation, rectoanal repair, sutured haemorrhoidopexy and minimal mucocutaneous excision for grades III-IV haemorrhoids: a multicenter prospective study of safety and efficacy. Colorectal Dis 12:125–134

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pol RA, van der Zwet WC, Hoornenborg D et al (2010) Results of 244 consecutive patients with hemorrhoids treated with Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Dig Surg 27:279–284

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Infantino A, Bellomo R, Dal Monte PP et al (2010) Transanal haemorrhoidal artery echodoppler ligation and anopexy (THD) is effective for II and III degree haemorrhoids: a prospective multicentric study. Colorectal Dis 12:804–809

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wilkerson PM, Strbac M, Reece-Smith H, Middleton SBL (2009) Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation: long-term outcome and patient satisfaction. Colorectal Dis 11:394–400

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Greenberg R, Karin E, Avital S, Skornick Y, Werbin N (2006) First 100 cases with Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:485–489

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Scheyer M, Antonietti E, Rollinger G, Mall H, Arnold SL (2006) Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Am J Surg 191:89–93

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Narro JL (2004) Hemorrhoid therapy with Doppler guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation via proctoscope KM-25. A new alternative to hemorrhoidectomy and rubber band ligation? Zentralbl Chir 129:208–210

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lienert M, Ulrich B (2004) Doppler-guided ligation of the hemorrhoidal arteries. Report of experiences with 248 patients. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 129:947–950

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Tagariello C, Dal Monte PP, Saragò M (2004) Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation. Chir Ital 56:693–697

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Arnold S, Antonietti E, Rollinger G, Scheyer M (2002) Doppler ultrasound assisted hemorrhoid artery ligation. A new therapy in symptomatic hemorrhoids. Chirurg 73:269–273

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Festen S, van Hoogstraten MJ, van Geloven AA, Gerhards MF (2009) Treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoidal disease with PPH or THD. A randomized trial on postoperative complications and short-term results. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1401–1405

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Giordano P, Nastro P, Davies A, Gravante G (2011) Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes. Tech Coloproctol 15:67–73

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ramirez JM, Gracia JA, Aguilella V et al (2005) Surgical management of symptomatic haemorrhoids: to cut, to hang or to strangulate? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 7:52

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.0 (updated February 2008). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008; http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed 15 April 2008

  38. 38.

    Review Manager (RevMan) (2008) [Computer program]. Version 5.0. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    DeMets DL (1987) Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations. Stat Med 6:341–350

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (2006) Systematic reviews in healthcare. BMJ Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ (2001) Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. Systemic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context, 2nd edn. BMJ Publication group, London

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Chalmers TC, Smith H Jr, Blackburn B et al (1981) A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Control Clin Trials 2:31–49

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    http://ims.cochrane.org/revman/other-resources/gradepro/download. Accessed 30 April 2011

  47. 47.

    Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, Zaman S, Gravante G (2009) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1665–1671

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bursics A, Morvay K, Kupcsulik P, Flautner L (2004) Comparison of early and 1-year follow-up results of conventional hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoid artery ligation: a randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:176–180

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lewis AAM, Rogers HS, Leighton M (1983) Trial of maximal anal dilatation, cryotherapy and elastic band ligation as alternatives to haemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of large prolapsing haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 70:54–56

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Shanmugam V, Hakeem A, Campbell KL et al (2005) Rubber band ligation versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy for haemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD005034. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005034.pub2

Download references

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Sajid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sajid, M.S., Parampalli, U., Whitehouse, P. et al. A systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 16, 1–8 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0796-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Stapled haemorrhoidopexy
  • Bleeding per rectum
  • Haemorrhoidectomy
  • Transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation
  • Procedure for prolapse and haemorrhoids