Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A nationwide audit of the use of radiotherapy for rectal cancer in Italy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is good evidence that radiotherapy is beneficial in advanced rectal cancer, but its application in Italy has not been investigated.

Methods

We conducted a nationwide survey among members of the Italian Society of Colo-Rectal Surgery (SICCR) on the use of radiation therapy for rectal cancer in the year 2005. Demographic, clinical and pathologic data were retrospectively collected with an online database. Italy was geographically divided into 3 regions: north, center and south which included the islands. Hospitals performing 30 or more surgeries per year were considered high volume. Factors related to radiotherapy delivery were identified with multivariate analysis.

Results

Of 108 centers, 44 (41%) responded to the audit. We collected data on 682 rectal cancer patients corresponding to 58% of rectal cancers operated by SICCR members in 2005. Radiotherapy was used in 307/682 (45.0%) patients. Preoperative radiotherapy was used in 236/682 (34.6%), postoperative radiotherapy in 71/682 (10.4%) cases and no radiotherapy in 375 (55.0%) cases. Of the 236 patients who underwent preoperative radiotherapy, only 24 (10.2%) received short-course radiotherapy, while 212 (89.8%) received long-course radiotherapy. Of the 339 stage II–III patients, 159 (47%) did not receive any radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was more frequently used in younger patients (P < 0.0001), in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR) (P < 0.01) and in the north and center of Italy (P < 0.001). Preoperative radiotherapy was more frequently used in younger patients (P < 0.001), in large volume centers (P < 0.05), in patients undergoing APR (P < 0.005) and in the north–center of Italy (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Our study first identified a treatment disparity among different geographic Italian regions. A more systematic audit is needed to confirm these results and plan adequate interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/colon-and-rectal. Accessed on 4/14/2010

  2. The Italian network of Cancer Registries (AIRT) (2007) National Center for Disease, Prevention and Control of the Public Health Ministry, Rome. Available at http://www.tumori.net/it/banca_dati/query.php

  3. Wiig JN, Carlsen E, Soreide O (1998) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a view from Europe. Semin Surg Oncol 15:78–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong RK, Tandan V, De Silva S, Figueredo A (2007) Pre-operative radiotherapy and curative surgery for the management of localized rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Apr 18: CD002102. (Review)

  5. Craven I, Sebag-Montefiore D (2007) Is there a role for radiotherapy in operable rectal cancer? Clinc Oncol 19:687–692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bosset J-F, Calais G, Mineur L et al (2005) Enhanced tumoricidal effect of chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: preliminary results e EORTC 22921. J Clin Oncol 23:5620–5627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA, Morris AM, Bullard KM (2005) Adjuvant radiation for rectal cancer: do we measure up to the standard of care? An epidemiologic analysis of trends over 25 years in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 48:9–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell NC, Elliott AM, Sharp L, Ritchie LD, Cassidy J, Little J (2002) Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer. Br J Cancer 87:585–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Phelip JM, Launoy G, Colonna M et al (2004) Regional variations in management of rectal cancer in France. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 28:378–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wibe A, Møller B, Norstein J, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group et al (2002) A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer–implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit Dis Colon Rectum 45:857–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Påhlman L, Bohe M, Cedermark B et al (2007) The Swedish rectal cancer registry. Br J Surg 94:1285–1292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bülow S, Harling H, Iversen LH, Ladelund S (2005) The Danish colorectal cancer group improved survival after rectal cancer in Denmark. Colorectal Dis. [Epub ahead of print]

  14. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (2002) International union against cancer (UICC) TNM classification of malignant tumors. Eds New York Wiley

  15. Schrag D, Gelfand SE, Bach PB, Guillem J, Minsky BD, Begg CB (2001) Who gets adjuvant treatment for stage II and III rectal cancer? Insight from surveillance, epidemiology, and end results—medicare. J Clin Oncol 19:3712–3718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Neugut AI, Fleischauer AT, Sundararajan V et al (2002) Use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for rectal cancer among the elderly: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol 20:2643–2650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ayanian JZ, Zaslavsky AM, Fuchs CS et al (2003) Use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for colorectal cancer in a population-based cohort. J Clin Oncol 21:1293–1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Martijn H, Vulto JC (2007) Should radiotherapy be avoided or delivered differently in elderly patients with rectal cancer? Eur J Cancer 43:2301–2306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. den Dulk M, Putter H, Collette L et al (2009) The abdominoperineal resection itself is associated with an adverse outcome: the European experience based on a pooled analysis of five European randomised clinical trials on rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45:1175–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pagano E, Di Cuonzo D, Bona C et al (2007) Accessibility as a major determinant of radiotherapy underutilization: a population based study. Health Policy 80:483–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Campbell NC, Elliott AM, Sharp L, Ritchie LD, Cassidy J, Little J (2002) Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer. Br J Cancer 87:585–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. White A, Liu CC, Xia R et al (2008) Racial disparities and treatment trends in a large cohort of elderly African Americans and Caucasians with colorectal cancer, 1991 to 2002. Cancer 113:3400–3409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morris AM, Wei Y, Birkmeyer NJ, Birkmeyer JD (2006) Racial disparities in late survival after rectal cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg 203:787–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shavers VL, Brown ML, Natl J (2002) Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment. Review. Cancer Inst 6:334–357

    Google Scholar 

  25. McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Sekeris E, Bastani R, Ko CY (2006) A patient’s race/ethnicity does not explain the underuse of appropriate adjuvant therapy in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49:319–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grande E, Inghelmann R, Francisci S et al (2007) Regional estimates of colorectal cancer burden in Italy. Tumori 93:352–359

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wibe A, Eriksen MT, Syse A, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Søreide O, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group (2005) Effect of hospital caseload on long-term outcome after standardization of rectal cancer surgery at a national level. Br J Surg 92:217–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Di Cataldo A, Scilletta B, Latino R, Cocuzza A, Li Destri G (2007) The surgeon as a prognostic factor in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Review. Surg Oncol 16(1):S53–S56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rogers SO, Ray WA, Smalley WE (2004) A population-based study of survival among elderly persons diagnosed with colorectal cancer: does race matter if all are insured? (United States). Cancer Causes Control 15:193–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Engel J, Kerr J, Eckel R et al (2005) Influence of hospital volume on local recurrence and survival in a population sample of rectal cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:512–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Heald RJ, Daniels I (2005) Rectal cancer management: Europe is ahead. Recent Results Cancer Res 165:75–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hogan AM, Kennelly R, Winter DC (2009) Volume-outcome analysis in rectal cancer: a plea for enquiry, evidence and evolution. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:111–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Valentini V, Beets-Tan R, Borras JM et al (2008) Evidence and research in rectal cancer. Radiother Oncol 87:449–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schwaderer KA, Proctor JW, Martz EF, Slack RJ, Ricci EJ (2008) Evaluation of patient navigation in a community radiation oncology center involved in disparities studies: a time-to-completion-of-treatment study. Oncol Pract 4:220–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McGory ML, Shekelle PG, Ko CY (2006) Development of quality indicators for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 15:1623–1633

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Prof. Lars Pahlman for critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Gagliardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gagliardi, G., Pucciarelli, S., Asteria, C.R. et al. A nationwide audit of the use of radiotherapy for rectal cancer in Italy. Tech Coloproctol 14, 229–235 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-010-0597-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-010-0597-9

Keywords

Navigation