Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transperineal ultrasound in the assessment of haemorrhoids and haemorrhoidectomy: a pilot study

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The purpose of the study was the measurement of the anal cushion area using static transperineal ultrasound in a group of patients with symptomatic grade III and IV haemorrhoids about to undergo haemorrhoidectomy and compare them with a group of age-matched normals and the measured area following haemorrhoidectomy.

Methods

Transperineal sonography was performed using a linear transducer measuring the anal cushion area by subtracting the measured luminal diameter of the undisturbed anal canal from the inner border of the internal anal sphincter. Measures were made 6 weeks following haemorrhoidectomy.

Results

Comparisons were made between 22 normals and 36 patients with haemorrhoids (31 evaluable post-operatively). The median area of normals was 0.78 cm2, that of pre-operative patients 2.25 cm2 and that of post-operative cases 1.20 cm2. There was a significant difference between pre- and post-operative cases with cushion areas of normal patients being significantly lower than post-operative cases. Variance of measurement in all 3 groups was negligible.

Conclusion

Static transperineal sonography measuring the anal cushion area is reproducible and shows marked differences between normals and patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids. There is a marked effect on measured area resultant from haemorrhoidectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thomson WH (1975) The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 62:542–552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gaj F, Trecca A (2005) Haemorrhoids and rectal internal mucosal prolapsed: one or two conditions? A national survey. Tech Coloproctol 9:163–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aigner F, Gruber H, Conrad F et al (2009) Revised morphology and hemodynamics of the anorectal vascular plexus: impact on the course of hemorrhoidal disease. Int J Colorect Dis 24:105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibbons CP, Trowbridge EA, Bannister JJ, Read NW (1986) Role of anal cushions in maintaining continence. Lancet 1:886–888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thekkinkattil DK, Dunham RJ, O’Herlihy S, Finan PJ, Sagar PM, Burke DA (2009) Measurement of anal cushions in idiopathic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 96:680–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Treitz W (1853) Uber Einem neuen Muskel am Duodenum des Menschen, uber elastische Sehnen, und einige andere anatomische Verhaltuisse. Viertal-Jahrschrift fur die praktische Helikunde (rager) 37:113–144

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stelzner F, Staubesand J, Machleidt H (1962) The corpus cavernosum recti–basis of internal haemorrhoids. Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir Ver Dtsch Z Chir 299:302–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parnaud E, Guntz M, Bernard A, Chome J (1976) Normal macroscopic and microscopic anatomy of the haemorrhoidal vascular system. Arch Fr Mal Appar Dig 65:501–514

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomson H (1979) The anal cushions–a fresh concept in diagnosis. Postgrad Med J 55:403–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sultan AH, Loder PB, Bartram CI, Kamm MA, Hudson CN (1994) Vaginal endosonography: new approach to image the undisturbed anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1296–1299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nicholls MJ, Dunham R, O’Herlihy S, Finan PJ, Sagar PM, Burke D (2006) Measurement of the anal cushions by transvaginal endosonography. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1410–1413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Barzilai N et al (2002) Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 45:239–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Schechtman E, Zbar AP (2004) Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study. Int J Colorect Dis 19:60–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. R Development Core Team (2007) A language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0

  15. Kleinübing H Jr, Jannini JF, Malafaia O, Brenner S, Pinho TM (2000) Transperineal ultrasonography: new method to image the anorectal region. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1572–1574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roche B, Deléaval J, Fransioli A, Marti MC (2001) Comparison of transanal and external perineal ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 11:1165–1170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Olsen IP, Augensen K, Wilsgaard T, Kiserud T (2008) Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincters: reproducibility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:675–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lunniss PJ, Mann CV (2004) Classification of internal haemorrhoids: a discussion paper. Colorect Dis 6:226–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gerjy R, Lindhoff-Larson A, Nyström P-O (2008) Grade of prolapse and symptoms of haemorrhoids are poorly correlated: result of a classification algorithm in 270 patients. Colorect Dis 19:694–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Benzoni E, Milan E, Cerato F, Nariusetti P, Bresadola V, Terrosu G (2006) Second degree haemorrhoids: patient’s satisfaction, immediate and long-term results of rubber band ligation treatment. Minerva Chir 61:119–124

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gregersen H, Kassab GS, Fung YC (2004) Determination of membrane tension during balloon distension of intestine. Mech Chem Biosyst 1:191–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Parks AG (1954) A note on the anatomy of the anal canal. Proc R Soc Med 47:997–998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kinney TB, Lee MJ, Mueller PR, Waltman AC (1995) A theoretical model using mechanical principles to quantify the physical principles of balloon dilatation. Acad Radiol 2:385–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zbar AP (2009) Measurement of anal cushions in idiopathic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 96:1373–1374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haas PA, Fox TA (1980) Age-related changes and scar formations of perianal connective tissue. Dis Colon Rectum 23:160–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Burnett SJ, Bartram CI (1991) Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis 6:2–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zbar AP, Aslam M, Gold DM, Gatzen C, Gosling A, Kmiot WA (1998) Parameters of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 41:200–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zbar AP, Beer-Gabel M, Chiappa AC, Aslam M (2001) Fecal incontinence after minor anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1610–1623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mutafova-Yambolieva VN, O’Driscoll K, Farrelly A, Ward SM, Keef KD (2003) Spatial localization and properties of pacemaker potentials in the canine rectoanal region. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 284:G748–G755

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pescatori M, Quondamcarlo C (1999) A new grading of rectal internal mucosal prolapse and its correlation with diagnosis and treatment. Int J Colorect Dis 14:245–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. P. Zbar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zbar, A.P., Murison, R. Transperineal ultrasound in the assessment of haemorrhoids and haemorrhoidectomy: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol 14, 175–179 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-010-0572-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-010-0572-5

Keywords

Navigation