Abstract
Background
Hartmann’s procedure and its reversal are associated with high cumulative morbidity rates. We assessed the outcomes of emergency Hartmann’s procedures and permanent stoma rates among Asians.
Methods
A retrospective review of all emergency Hartmann’s procedure performed from 1996 to 2001 was performed.
Results
Emergency Hartmann’s procedure was performed in 98 patients with a median age of 68 years. These included 58 patients with cancer and 18 with diverticulitis; 77 patients had pre-existing comorbidities. The mortality and morbidity rates were 19% and 65%, respectively. Mortality was impacted by pre-existing respiratory or cardiac disease, age and ASA grade. Likewise, morbidity was significantly increased in the presence of comorbidities, including hypertension and cardiac disease, and age. On multivariate analysis, only age (p=0.003, OR=1.171) and respiratory disease (p=0.029, OR=11.05) affected mortality rates whilst hypertension (p=0.011, OR=5.85) and cardiac disease (p=0.044, OR=5.46) affected morbidity rates. Re-anastomosis was performed in 70 patients, and in 28 of these patients (40%) bowel continuity was re-established after a median of 9 months with a 7% morbidity rate. Reversibility was only related to patient age (p=0.011).
Conclusions
Hartmann’s procedure is valid among Asians, and its mortality and morbidity rates are related to patients’ pre-existing health conditions. The predominant cause is colorectal cancer and permanent stoma rates are related to patient age.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hartmann H (1921) Chirurgie du rectum. Masson, Paris
Boyden AM (1950) The surgical treatment of diverticulitis of the colon. Ann Surg. 132:94–109
Khosraviani K, Campbell WJ, Parks TG, Irwin ST (2000) Hartmann procedure revisited. Eur J Surg 166:878–881
Schein M, Decker G (1998) The Hartmann procedure: extended indications in severe intraabdominal infection. Dis Colon Rectum 31:126–129
Seah DW, Ibrahim S, Tay KH (2005) Hartmann procedure: Is it still relevant today? ANZ J Surg 75:436–440
Desai DC, Brennan EJ, Reilly JF, Smink RD Jr (1998) The utility of the Hartmann procedure. Am J Surg 175:152–155
Banerjee S, Leather AJM, Rennie JA et al (2005) Feasibility and morbidity of reversal of Hartmann’s. Colorectal Dis 7:454–459
Salem L, Flum DR (2004) Primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systemic review. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1953–1964
Koruth NM, Krukowski ZH, Youngson GG et al (1985) Intraoperative colonic irrigation in the management of left-sided large bowel emergencies. Br J Surg 72:708–711
Zorcolo L, Covotta L, Carlomagno N, Bartolo DCC (2003) Safety of primary anastomosis in emergency colo-rectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 5:262–269
Kressner U, Antonsson J, Ejerblad S et al (1994) Intra-operative colonic lavage and primary anastomosis — an alternative to Hartmann procedure in emergency surgery of the left colon. Eur J Surg 160:287–292
Lee YS (1986) Diverticular disease of the large bowel in Singapore: an autopsy study. Dis Colon Rectum 29:330–335
Chia JG, Wilde CC, Ngoi SS et al (1991) Trends of diverticular disease of the large bowel in a newly developed country. Dis Colon Rectum 34:498–501
Biondo S, Jaurrieta E, Marti Rague J et al (2000) Role of resection and primary anastomosis of the left colon in the presence of peritonitis. Br J Surg 87:1580–1584
Singapore Department of Statistics Year 2000
Huang J, Seow A, Shi CY, Lee HP (1999) Colorectal carcinoma among ethnic Chinese in Singapore: trends in incidence rate by anatomical subsite from 1968 to 1992. Cancer 85:2519–2525
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leong, Q.M., Koh, D.C. & Ho, C.K. Emergency Hartmann’s procedure: morbidity, mortality and reversal rates among Asians. Tech Coloproctol 12, 21–25 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0393-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0393-y