Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The place for colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis: a valid surgical option for ulcerative colitis?

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Conflicting views regarding the use of ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in ulcerative colitis (UC) exist and this controversy prompted us to review our experience, especially against the background of the current tendency to choose the ileal pouch-anal procedure (IPAA).

Methods

Thirty-two consecutive patients with IRA were studied. Complications, failure rate, reasons for failure and functional results were assessed. The median follow-up time was 3.5 years.

Results

The overall complication rate was 28%. The rectum was excised in 4 patients, indicating a failure rate of 12%. The mean daily evacuation frequency was 5.6. Despite urgency occurring in one-third of the patients, continence function was well preserved.

Conclusions

Employed on a selective basis, IRA is a safe procedure with low mortality and morbidity and good prospects for success in many patients with UC. The patients must be prepared to submit to life-long rectoscopy surveillance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Börjesson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Börjesson, L., Lundstam, U., Öresland, T. et al. The place for colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis: a valid surgical option for ulcerative colitis?. Tech Coloproctol 10, 237–241 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-006-0286-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-006-0286-x

Key words

Navigation