Abstract
Background
The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a nutritional index for elderly patients that is associated with prognosis in cancer patients. We investigated using the GNRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to predict prognosis.
Methods
This study included 419 metastatic colorectal cancer patients who received first-line chemotherapy between February 2005 and December 2020. First, we calculated pre-treatment GNRI and divided the patients into four groups according to the values (G1–G4). We evaluated patient characteristics and overall survival in the four groups.
Results
Overall, 419 patients were included. The median follow-up was 34.4 months. Lower GNRI was positively associated with a lower grade Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (p = 0.009), synchronous metastases (p < 0.001), primary tumor resection prior to chemotherapy (p = 0.006), and did not undergo resection after chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Patients with low GNRI had significantly shorter overall survival than the group with high GNRI (median OS: G1 = 19.3 months [M], G2 = 30.8 M, G3 = 38 M, G4 = 39.7 M; log-rank test, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that GNRI was an independent prognostic factor (G3: HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.35–0.69; G4: HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48–0.93). In the subgroup analysis of overall survival, we found no interaction between clinicopathological factors and the prognostic value of GNRI. Interestingly, younger patients (< 70 years) but not older patients showed a significant difference in overall survival according to GNRI, despite being the metric being designed for elderly patients.
Conclusion
Pretreatment GNRI can be a prognostic marker for patients with mCRC who received systemic chemotherapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grothey A, Fakih M, Tabernero J (2021) Management of BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: a review of treatment options and evidence-based guidelines. Ann Oncol. 32(8):959–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.206
Biller LH, Schrag D (2021) Diagnosis and treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review. JAMA. 325(7):669–685. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.0106
Ciombor KK, Bekaii-Saab T (2018) A comprehensive review of sequencing and combination strategies of targeted agents in metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncol. 23(1):25–34. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0203
Gallagher DJ, Kemeny N (2010) Metastatic colorectal cancer: from improved survival to potential cure. Oncol 78:237–248. https://doi.org/10.1159/000315730
Ychou M, Rivoire M, Thezenas S et al (2013) A randomized phase II trial of three intensified chemotherapy regimens in first-line treatment of colorectal cancer patients with initially unresectable or not optimally resectable liver metastases. The METHEP Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 20:4289–4297. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3217-x
Folprecht G, Gruenberger T, Bechstein WO et al (2010) Tumour response and secondary resectability of colorectal liver metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab: the CELIM randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 11(1):38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70330-4
Bouilanne O, Morineau G, Dupont C et al (2005) Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index: a new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients. Am J Clin Nutr 82(4):777–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/acjn/82.4.777
Kubo N, Sakurai K, Tamura T et al (2019) The impact of geriatric nutritional risk index on surgical outcomes after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Esophagus 16(2):147–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-018-0644-6
Karayama Masato, Inoue Yusuke, Yoshimura Katsuhiro et al (2022) Association of the geriatric nutritional risk index Wuth the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer after nivolumab therapy. J Immunother. 45(2):125–131. https://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0000000000000396
Doi S, Migita K, Ueno M et al (2022) The prognostic significance of the geriatric nutritional risk index in colorectal patients. Nutr Cancer 7:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2022.2036768
Kushiyama S, Sakurai K, Kubo N et al (2018) The preoperative geriatric nutritional risk index predicts postoperative complications in elderly patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy. In Vivo 32(6):1667–1672. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11430
Kanno H, Goto Y, Sasaki S et al (2021) Geriatric nutritional risk index predicts the prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: a propensity score matching analysis. Sci Rep 11(1):9038. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88254-z
Lidoriki I, Schizas D, Frountzas M et al. (2019) GNRI as a prognostic factor for outcomes in cancer patients: a systematic review of literature. Nutrit Cancer https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2020.1756350
Sasaki Masaru, Miyoshi Norikatsu, Fujino Shiki et al (2020) The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index predicts postoperative complications and prognosis in elderly patients with colorectal cancer after curative surgery. Sci Rep 10:10744. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67285-y
Tang S, Xie H, Kuang J et al (2020) The value of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in evaluating postoperative complication risk and long-term prognosis in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Manag Res 12:165–175. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S234688
Buzby GP, Knox LS, Crosby LO et al (1988) Study protocol: a randomized clinical trial of total parenteral nutrition in malnourished surgical patients. Am J Clin Nutr 47(2 Suppl):366–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/47.2.366
Ca OH, Kim DH, Jong OH et al (2012) Nutritional risk index as a predictor of postoperative wound complications after gastrectomy. World J Gastoenterol. 18(7):673–678. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i7.673
Chumlea WC, Roche AF, Steinbaugh ML (1985) Estimating stature from knee height for persons 60 to 90 years of age. J Am Geriatr Soc 33(2):116–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1985.tb02276.x
Yang Z, Zheng Y, Wu Z et al (2021) Association between pre-diagnostic serum albumin and cancer risk: Results from a prospective population-based study. Cancer Med 10(12):4054–4065. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3937
Lai CC, You JF, Yeh CY et al (2011) Low preoperative serum albumin in colon cancer: A risk factor for poor outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(4):473–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1113-4
Atsumi Y, Kawahara S, Kakuta S et al (2021) Low operative albumin-to-globulin ratio is a marker of poor prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer. In Vivo 35(6):3555–3561. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12658
Tomizawa Y, Shida D, Boku N et al (2020) Nutritional and inflammatory measures predict survival of patients with stageIV colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 20(1):1092. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07560-3
Ishida Y, Maeda K, Nonogaki T et al (2020) Malnutrition at admission predicts In-Hspital falls in hospitalized older adults. Nutrients 12(2):541. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12020541
Margareta DP, Kerstin EB, Krassimir SK et al (2002) Nutritional status using mini nutritional assessment and subjective global assessment predict mortality in geriatric patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 50(12):1996–2002. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50611.x
Alessandro L, Luca DL, Angela K (2018) Nutrition support and clinical outcome in advanced cancer patients. Proc Nutr Soc 77(4):388–393. https://doi.org/10.1017/S00296651180000459
Acknowledgements
We thank Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
No conflicts of interest were declared for the remaining authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Kato, R., Miyamoto, Y., Ouchi, M. et al. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index is a prognostic marker in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 28, 893–900 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-023-02338-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-023-02338-6