Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of carcinoma in situ on the outcome of intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comparative analysis of large real-world data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study investigated the clinical impact of carcinoma in situ (CIS) in intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

Methods

This study retrospectively evaluated 3035 patients who were diagnosed with NMIBC and treated by intravesical BCG therapy between 2000 and 2019 at 31 institutions. Patients were divided into six groups according to the presence of CIS as follows: low-grade Ta without concomitant CIS, high-grade Ta without concomitant CIS, high-grade Ta with concomitant CIS, high-grade T1 without concomitant CIS, high-grade T1 with concomitant CIS, and pure CIS (without any papillary lesion). The endpoints were recurrence- and progression-free survival after the initiation of BCG therapy. We analyzed to identify factors associated with recurrence and progression.

Results

At a median follow-up of 44.4 months, recurrence and progression were observed in 955 (31.5%) and 316 (10.4%) patients, respectively. Comparison of six groups using univariate and multivariate analysis showed no significant association of CIS. However, CIS in the prostatic urethra was an independent factors associated with progression.

Conclusion

Concomitant CIS did not show a significant impact in the analysis of Ta and T1 tumors which were treated using intravesical BCG. Concomitant CIS in the prostatic urethra was associated with high risk of progression. Alternative treatment approaches such as radical cystectomy should be considered for patients with NMIBC who have a risk of progression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The corresponding author can be contacted regarding the use of the data. The data are not publicly available.

Code availability

A software application has been used for the code.

References

  1. Kamat A, Hahn N, Efstathiou J et al (2016) Bladder cancer. Lancet 388:2796–2810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pasin E, Josephson D, Mitra A et al (2008) Superficial bladder cancer: an update on etiology, molecular development, classification, and natural history. Rev Urol 10:31–43

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2020) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: bladder cancer. Version 6:2020

    Google Scholar 

  4. Babjuk M, Burger M, Gontero P et al (2019) European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ)—2019 update. Eur Urol 76:639–657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sylvester R, Brausi M, Kirkels W et al (2010) Long-term efficacy results of EORTC genito-urinary group randomized phase 3 study 30911 comparing intravesical instillations of epirubicin, bacillus Calmette-Guérin, and bacillus Calmette-Guérin plus isoniazid in patients with intermediate- and high-risk stage Ta T1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol 57:766–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fernandez-Gomez J, Madero R, Solsona E et al (2009) Predicting nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer recurrence and progression in patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin: the CUETO scoring model. J Urol 182:2195–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Miyake M, Iida K, Nishimura N et al (2021) Non-maintenance intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction therapy with eight doses in patients with high- or highest-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a retrospective non-randomized comparative study. BMC Cancer 21:266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gontero P, Sylvester R, Pisano F et al (2015) Prognostic factors and risk groups in T1G3 non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients initially treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin: results of a Retrospective Multicenter Study of 2451 Patients. Eur Urol 67:74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sylvester R, Meiden A, Oosterlinck W et al (2006) Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 49:466–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Palou J, Sylvester R, Faba O et al (2012) Female gender and carcinoma In Situ in the prostatic urethra are prognostic factors for recurrence, progression, and disease-specific mortality in T1G3 bladder cancer patients treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Eur Urol 62:118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen S, Zhang N, Shao J et al (2018) Maintenance versus non-maintenance intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin instillation for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int J Surg 52:248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chou R, Selph S, Buckley D et al (2017) Intravesical therapy for the treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 197:1189–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Richards K, Lin S, Chuo C et al (2020) Increased bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment intensity associated with improved outcomes in elderly patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in united states clinical practice. Urology 145:172–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Herr H, Sogani P (2001) Does early cystectomy improve the survival of patients with high risk superficial bladder tumors? J Urol 166:1296–1299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tully K, Roghmann F, Noldus J et al (2020) Quantifying the overall survival benefit with early radical cystectomy for patients with histologically confirmed T1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 18:651–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kokorovic A, Westerman M, Krause K et al (2021) Revisiting an old conundrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Intravesical therapy for treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the prostate. Bladder Cancer 7:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsumoto H, Shiraishi K, Azuma H et al (2020) Clinical practice guidelines for bladder cancer 2019 update by the Japanese Urological Association: summary of the revision. Int J Urol 27:702–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Palou J, Baniel J, Klotz L et al (2007) Urotherial carcinoma of the prostate. Urology 69:50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Data collection and analysis, and manuscript writing: RT. Data collection: RM, YS, MM, SH, SF, FH, and KH. Conceptualization: MM, RT, TK, TK, and YM. Methodology: NN. Validation CO. Formal analysis: NN. Investigation: YM. Data curation: KI. Supervision: HM. Project administration: HK and HN. Wrote the original draft of the manuscript: RT. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Makito Miyake.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and Approved on 23 May 2019 by the Institutional Review Board of each participating institute (Reference Protocol ID: NMU-2217) of the Japan Urological Oncology Group framework. Official names of institutional review board of each collaborating institute are listed here: the Medical ethics committee at Osaka University; the ethics committee of Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine; the Ethics Committee on Clinical Research, Kagoshima University; the Medical Ethics Committee for Kitasato University; the Kyushu University Hospital Ethics Committee; the Ethics Committee Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine Kyoto University; the Ethics committee of The Jikei University School of Medicine for Biomedical Research; the Ethics Committee of Shimane University; the Ethics Committee of Chiba University; the Ethics in Human Subject Research at the University of Tsukuba; the Ethics Committee of University of Toyama; the Ethical committee of Harasanshin Hospital; the Committee of Medical Ethics of Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine; the Independent Ethics Committee of Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine; the Ethical Review Committee of Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine; the Research Ethics Committee of University of Miyazaki; the Medical Ethics Review board of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine; the Ethical committee of National Cancer Center Research Institute; the Ethical committee National Cancer Center Research Institute East; the Shikoku Cancer Center Ethics Committee; the Akita University School of Medicine Ethics Committee; Tottori University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee; the Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine Ethics Committee; the Ethics Committee of Hamamatsu University School of Medicine; the Ethics Committee of Nara Prefecture General Medical Center; the Ethics Committee of Kokuho Chuo Hospital; the Ethics Committee of Nara City Hospital; the Ethics Committee of Yamato Koriyama Hospital; the Ethics Committee of Hirao Hospital; the Ethics Committee of Saiseikai Chuwa Hospital.

Informed consent

An opt-out approach was used to obtain informed consent from the patients and personal information was protected during data collection.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10147_2022_2127_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplementary Table 1: Patient characteristics and events compared Groups 2 (high-grade Ta without concomitant CIS) and 3 (high-grade Ta with concomitant CIS) (DOCX 16 KB)

10147_2022_2127_MOESM2_ESM.docx

Supplementary Table 2: Patient characteristics and events compared Groups 4 (high-grade T1 without concomitant CIS) and 5 (high-grade T1 with concomitant CIS) (DOCX 16 KB)

Supplementary Table 3: The multivariate analyses including T category, grade and concomitant CIS (DOCX 17 KB)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomida, R., Miyake, M., Minato, R. et al. Impact of carcinoma in situ on the outcome of intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comparative analysis of large real-world data. Int J Clin Oncol 27, 958–968 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-022-02127-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-022-02127-7

Keywords

Navigation