Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relationship between psoas muscle index and long-term survival in older patients aged ≥ 80 years after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In Japan, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely performed for ESD-adapted gastric cancer, but little is known about the prognostic factors after ESD for gastric cancer in older patients. The psoas muscle index (PMI) is an indicator of sarcopenia calculated from computed tomography images and reportedly related to the prognosis of some diseases. This study aimed to explore factors related to long-term survival after ESD for gastric cancer in patients aged ≥ 80 years.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 88 patients (63 men, 25 women) with early gastric cancer who underwent ESD at ≥ 80 years. Possible factors related to death after gastric ESD were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses using a Cox proportional hazards model. The estimated overall survival (OS) was compared between the groups stratified by significant factors.

Results

The 5-year OS rate was 73.9% (median follow-up period, 5.4 years). In the multivariate analysis, a low PMI (< 6.36 in men, < 3.92 in women) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–7.54) and high Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (≥ 3) (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.14–3.09) were independently related to death after ESD. The 5-year OS rates were significantly higher in the high PMI group (82.3% vs. 70.7%, P = 0.026) and the low CCI group (76.0% vs. 37.9%, P = 0.002).

Conclusion

In addition to low CCI, high PMI is a predictor of long-term survival after ESD for gastric cancer in patients aged ≥ 80 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors elect to not share the data.

References

  1. Abridged Life Tables for Japan (2019) https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db-hw/lifetb19/. Accessed 1 July 2021

  2. Hamaguchi Y, Kaido T, Okumura S et al (2014) Impact of quality as well as quantity of skeletal muscle on outcomes after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 20(11):1413–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Okumura S, Kaido T, Hamaguchi Y et al (2015) Impact of preoperative quality as well as quantity of skeletal muscle on survival after resection of pancreatic cancer. Surgery 157(6):1088–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harada K, Suzuki S, Ishii H et al (2017) Impact of skeletal muscle mass on long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease. Am J Cardiol 119(8):1275–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kasahara R, Kawahara T, Ohtake S et al (2017) A low psoas muscle index before treatment can predict a poorer prognosis in advanced bladder cancer patients who receive gemcitabine and nedaplatin therapy. Biomed Res Int 2017:7981549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Noguchi H, Miyasaka Y, Kaku K et al (2018) Preoperative muscle volume predicts graft survival after pancreas transplantation: a retrospective observational cohort study. Transpl Proc 50(5):1482–1488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsutsumi S, Kawahara T, Teranishi JI et al (2018) A low psoas muscle volume predicts longer hospitalization and cancer recurrence in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Mol Clin Oncol 8(2):320–322

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Katsui K, Ogata T, Watanabe K et al (2021) Sarcopenia is related to poor prognosis in patients after trimodality therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 26(8):1450–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. IARC Publications Website—World Cancer Report (2014). https://publications.iarc.fr/Non-Series-Publications/World-Cancer-Reports/World-Cancer-Report-2014. Accessed 1 July 2021

  10. Cancer statistics in Japan (2021). https://ganjoho.jp/public/qa_links/report/statistics/en.html. Accessed 1 July 2021

  11. Asaka M, Kobayashi M, Kudo T et al (2020) Gastric cancer deaths by age group in Japan: outlook on preventive measures for elderly adults. Cancer Sci 111(10):3845–3853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kakushima N, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S et al (2007) Technical feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms in the elderly Japanese population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22(3):311–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tokioka S, Umegaki E, Murano M et al (2012) Utility and problems of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in elderly patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27(Suppl 3):63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sekiguchi M, Oda I, Suzuki H et al (2017) Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients aged >/=85 years undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 85(5):963–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iwai N, Dohi O, Naito Y et al (2018) Impact of the Charlson comorbidity index and prognostic nutritional index on prognosis in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc 30(5):616–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G (1984) Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 85(9):1001–1005

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamaguchi Y, Kaido T, Okumura S et al (2016) Proposal for new diagnostic criteria for low skeletal muscle mass based on computed tomography imaging in Asian adults. Nutrition 32:1200–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2017) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 20(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kojima T, Shimada K, Terada A et al (2016) Association between polypharmacy and multiple uses of medical facilities in nursing home residents. Geriatr Gerontol Int 16(6):770–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Esaki M, Hatta W, Shimosegawa T et al (2019) Age affects clinical management after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Dig Dis 16:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  22. Durand F, Buyse S, Francoz C et al (2014) Prognostic value of muscle atrophy in cirrhosis using psoas muscle thickness on computed tomography. J Hepatol 60(6):1151–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Masuda T, Shirabe K, Ikegami T et al (2014) Sarcopenia is a prognostic factor in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 20(4):401–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hiraoka A, Aibiki T, Okudaira T et al (2015) Muscle atrophy as pre-sarcopenia in Japanese patients with chronic liver disease: computed tomography is useful for evaluation. J Gastroenterol 50(12):1206–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harimoto N, Shirabe K, Yamashita YI et al (2013) Sarcopenia as a predictor of prognosis in patients following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 100(11):1523–1530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaido T, Ogawa K, Fujimoto Y et al (2013) Impact of sarcopenia on survival in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transpl 13(6):1549–1556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fujiwara N, Nakagawa H, Kudo Y et al (2015) Sarcopenia, intramuscular fat deposition, and visceral adiposity independently predict the outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 63(1):131–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hanai T, Shiraki M, Nishimura K et al (2015) Sarcopenia impairs prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis. Nutrition 31(1):193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nishigori T, Okabe H, Tanaka E et al (2016) Sarcopenia as a predictor of pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 113(6):678–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nakamura R, Inage Y, Tobita R et al (2018) Sarcopenia in resected NSCLC: effect on postoperative outcomes. J Thorac Oncol 13(7):895–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concept and design: NI. Acquisition of subjects and/or data: KF, RM, KF, TY, TI, EO, MN, and HK. Data analysis and interpretation: YH and MF. Preparation of manuscript: NI and KF.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kohei Funasaka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nagoya University Hospital (IRB No. 2015-0485).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 21 kb)

10147_2021_2112_MOESM2_ESM.docx

Supplementary file2 Figure S1. Measurement of PMI at the level of L3 vertebra on CT. PMI, psoas muscle index; CT, computed tomography. Figure S2. Disease-specific survival for each curability. Figure S3. Median PMI by sex. The median PMI of men was 4.96 (cm2/m2), whereas that for women was 3.85 (cm2/m2). PMI, psoas muscle index. Figure S4. Comparison of overall survival curves between the low and high PMI groups (divided PMI groups by median PMI by sex) (P=0.028). PMI, psoas muscle index (PPTX 280 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ito, N., Funasaka, K., Miyahara, R. et al. Relationship between psoas muscle index and long-term survival in older patients aged ≥ 80 years after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 27, 729–738 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-02112-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-02112-6

Keywords

Navigation