Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On-treatment C-reactive protein control could predict response to subsequent anti-PD-1 treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of the on-treatment C-reactive protein (CRP) status during systemic treatment as the predictive marker for the response of subsequent nivolumab monotherapy in patients with refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Patients and methods

A total of 73 mRCC patients treated with nivolumab were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the serum CRP levels before and after molecular-targeted treatments. Patients whose CRP did not exceed baseline value were defined as the CRP-control group and the others were defined as the CRP-progression group. The clinical impact of CRP-control on the efficacy of nivolumab was assessed.

Results

Twenty-four patients (33%) were categorized into the CRP-control group. The CRP-control group patients (median PFS not reached) had significantly longer PFS than the CRP-progression group (median PFS 11.9 months, 95% confidence interval, CI 4.1–19.8, p = 0.038). The CRP-control group had a tendency of longer OS from nivolumab initiation than the CRP-progression group (p = 0.071). By multivariate analysis, the on-treatment CRP-control was the independent predictive factor for PFS (hazard ratio HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14–0.99, p = 0.047).

Conclusion

The on-treatment CRP-control could be the predictive factor for the efficacy of nivolumab in refractory mRCC patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF et al (2015) Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 373:1803–1813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishihara H, Kondo T, Takagi T et al (2018) Immediate progressive disease in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab: a multi-institution retrospective study. Target Oncol 13:611–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buder-Bakhaya K, Hassel JC (2018) Biomarkers for clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment-a review from the melanoma perspective and beyond. Front Immunol 9:1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeng F, Wei H, Yeoh E et al (2016) Inflammatory markers of CRP, IL6, TNFalpha, and soluble TNFR2 and the risk of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 25:1231–1239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou B, Shu B, Yang J et al (2014) C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control 25:1397–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beuselinck B, Vano YA, Oudard S et al (2014) Prognostic impact of baseline serum C-reactive protein in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with sunitinib. BJU Int 114:81–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Takamatsu K, Mizuno R, Omura M et al (2018) Prognostic value of baseline serum C-reactive protein level in intermediate-risk group patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma treated by first-line vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 16(4):e927–e933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Takamatsu K, Mizuno R, Tanaka N et al (2019) Prognostic value of serum C-reactive protein level prior to second-line treatment in intermediate risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Int J Clin Oncol 24:1069–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (Version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM et al (2009) Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 27:5794–5799

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al (2007) Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:115–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P et al (2007) Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356:2271–2281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D et al (2013) Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 369:722–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Takagi T, Kondo T, Kennoki T et al (2013) Comparison of survival rates in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma according to treatment era including cytokine and targeted therapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 43:439–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Escudier B, Sharma P, McDermott DF et al (2017) CheckMate 025 randomized phase 3 study: outcomes by key baseline factors and prior therapy for nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 72(6):962–971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF et al (2018) Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 378:1277–1290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kondo T, Nomura M, Otsuka A et al (2018) Predicting marker for early progression in unresectable melanoma treated with nivolumab. Int J Clin Oncol 24(2):323–327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zahoor H, Barata PC, Jia X et al (2018) Patterns, predictors and subsequent outcomes of disease progression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab. J Immunother Cancer 6:107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sproston NR, Ashworth JJ (2018) Role of C-reactive protein at sites of inflammation and infection. Front Immunol 9:754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alberti L, Thomachot MC, Bachelot T et al (2004) IL-6 as an intracrine growth factor for renal carcinoma cell lines. Int J Cancer 111:653–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oya M, Horiguchi A, Mizuno R et al (2003) Increased activation of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-beta correlates with the invasiveness of renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 9:1021–1027

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Huber V, Camisaschi C, Berzi A et al (2017) Cancer acidity: an ultimate frontier of tumor immune escape and a novel target of immunomodulation. Semin Cancer Biol 43:74–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR et al (2012) Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2443–2454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan LC, Li CW, Xia W et al (2019) IL-6/JAK1 pathway drives PD-L1 Y112 phosphorylation to promote cancer immune evasion. J Clin Invest 129:3324–3338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Snyder A, Makarov V, Merghoub T et al (2014) Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N Engl J Med 371:2189–2199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McDermott DF, Huseni MA, Atkins MB et al (2018) Clinical activity and molecular correlates of response to atezolizumab alone or in combination with bevacizumab versus sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma. Nat Med 24:749–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tumeh PC, Harview CL, Yearley JH et al (2014) PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature 515:568–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported in part by grants-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan (20K09585 to R.M. and 19K16807 to K.T.)

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryuichi Mizuno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

Ryuichi Mizuno MD has received honoraria from Bristol, Novartis, and Pfizer. Mototsugu Oya MD has received honoraria from Bayer, Bristol, Novartis, and Pfizer. Other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was waived by the local Ethics Committee of Keio University in view of the retrospective nature of the study. All procedures performed in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Because this was a retrospective cohort study, informed consent was waived. Opt out was done on the web site of Keio University.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takamatsu, K., Mizuno, R., Baba, Y. et al. On-treatment C-reactive protein control could predict response to subsequent anti-PD-1 treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol 26, 1500–1505 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-01930-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-01930-y

Keywords

Navigation