Abstract
Purpose
Combination carboplatin and S-1 is active in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on this combination for elderly patients with NSCLC are insufficient.
Methods
Eligibility criteria were no prior chemotherapy, Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, performance status 0–1, age ≥ 75 years, and adequate hematological, hepatic, and renal functions. Carboplatin was administered on day 1 and S-1 was administered orally, twice a day, between days 1 and 14, repeated every 3 weeks. In phase I, the primary purpose was determination of the recommended dose. Starting doses of carboplatin and S-1 were area under the curve (AUC) of 4 and 80 mg/m2/day, respectively. In the extension study, the effects and tolerability of this combination therapy of recommended dose were confirmed.
Results
A total of 10 patients were entered into phase I and 14 patients were entered into the extension study. The recommended doses for this drug combination are AUC 5 for carboplatin and 80 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks for S-1. With carboplatin and S-1 combination therapy at the recommended dose, the response rate was 30.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12–54%] and the disease control rate was 90.0% (95% CI 68–99%). Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were major adverse events.
Conclusions
The recommended doses for this combination therapy are carboplatin AUC 5 and S-1 80 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks, and this combination is effective with tolerable toxicities for advanced NSCLC patients ≥ 75 years old.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Siegel RS, Miller KD, Jemel A (2016) Cancer statistics 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66:7–30
Grilli R, Oxman AD, Julian JA (1993) Chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: how much benefit is enough? J Clin Oncol 11:1866–1872
Souquet PJ, Chauvin F, Boissel JP et al (1993) Polychemotherapy in advanced non small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet 342:19–21
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group (1995) Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials. Br Med J 311:899–909
Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R et al (2004) Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 350(21):2129–2139
Yang JC, Sequist LV, Geater SL et al (2015) Clinical activity of afatinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring uncommon EGFR mutations: a combined post-hoc analysis of LUX-Lung 2, LUX-Lung 3, and LUX-Lung 6. Lancet Oncol 16(7):830–838
Maemondo M, Minegishi Y, Inoue A et al (2012) First-line gefitinib in patients aged 75 or older with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: NEJ 003 study. J Thorac Oncol 7(9):1417–1422
Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW et al (2014) First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 371(23):2167–2177
Hida T, Nokihara H, Kondo M et al (2017) Alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (J-ALEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 390(10089):29–39
Fukuoka M, Wu YL, Thongprasert S et al (2011) Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS). J Clin Oncol 29(21):2866–2874
Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P et al (2015) Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373(2):123–135
Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L et al (2015) Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373(17):1627–1639
Davidoff AJ, Tang M, Seal B et al (2010) Chemotherapy and survival benefit in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:2191–2197
The Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study Group (1999) Effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:66–72
Gridelli C, Perrone F, Gallo C et al (2003) Chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) phase III randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:362–372
Kudoh S, Takeda K, Nakagawa K et al (2006) Phase III study of docetaxel compared with vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Trial (WJTOG 9904). J Clin Oncol 24:3657–3663
Quoix E, Zalcman G, Oster JP et al (2011) Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique: carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy compared with monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: IFCT-0501 randomized, phase 3 trial. Lancet 378:1079–1088
Shirasaka T, Shimamato Y, Ohshimo H et al (1996) Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs 7:548–557
Kasai T, Nakamura Y, Fukuda M et al (2016) A phase II study of S-1 for previously untreated elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chemotherapy 61(2):93–98
Goto H, Okano Y, Machida H et al (2018) Phase II study of tailored S-1 monotherapy with a 1-week interval after a 2-week dosing period in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Respir Investig 56(1):80–86
Okamoto I, Yoshioka H, Morita S et al (2010) Phase III trial comparing oral S-1 plus carboplatin with paclitaxel plus carboplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a west Japan oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 28(36):5240–5246
Abe T, Takeda K, Ohe Y et al (2015) Randomized phase III trial comparing weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin versus docetaxel monotherapy every 3 weeks in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: The Intergroup Trial JCOG0803/WJOG4307L. J Clin Oncol 33:575–581
Nokihara H, Lu S, Mok TSK et al (2017) Randomized controlled trial of S-1 versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (East Asia S-1 Trial in Lung Cancer). Ann Oncol 28(11):2698–2706
Kuyama S, Ochi N, Bessho A et al (2017) A phase II trial of carboplatin plus S-1 for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor: the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 1202. Lung Cancer 112:188–194
Okamoto I, Nokihara H, Yoh K et al (2019) Randomized phase III study comparing carboplatin plus pemetrexed followed by pemetrexed versus docetaxel in elderly patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG1210/WJOG7813L). American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting. Abstract 9031
Mok TSK, Wu YL, Kudaba I, for the KEYNOTE-042 Investigators, et al (2019) Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomized, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 393(10183):1819–1830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32409-7
Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, IMpower150 Study Group et al (2018) Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med 378(24):2288–2301
Funding
This study was supported by The Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No author has any conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kasai, T., Mori, K., Kishi, K. et al. A phase I and extension study of S-1 and carboplatin for previously untreated patients aged 75 years or more with advanced non-small cell lung cancer -TCOG 1101-. Int J Clin Oncol 25, 867–875 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-020-01629-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-020-01629-6