Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perspectives of Japanese oncologists on the health economics of innovative cancer treatments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Few reports have thus far discussed the influence of economic factors on treatment decision-making by patients. The objective of the present study was to clarify the awareness among oncologists of health economics in cancer treatment.

Methods

The present study was based on the questionnaire regarding health economics in cancer treatment carried out by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) in July 2013. The subjects were trustees registered with JSCO. The survey investigated the influence of medical expenses on patient access to and selection of medical treatment in order to clarify the primary attributes of the respondents and their awareness of economics. The study also investigated the maximum allowable public medical expenses to prolong the life expectancy of a cancer patient by 1 year and the factors that can influence treatment selection.

Results

The 172 respondents had completed a mean of 30.3 ± 6.2 postgraduate years, and the mean number of patients they treated annually was 1323 ± 1963. The degree of treatment accessibility among patients was perceived positively by 112 (71.3 %) and negatively by 49 (28.7 %) of the respondents, irrespective of medical expenses. Of the 172 respondents, 66 (41.0 %) believed that the maximum allowable medical expenses for cancer treatment should be ≤4 million yen/LY, with 62 (39.8 %) reporting a value of 4.01–8 million yen/LY.

Conclusion

The findings of this study suggest that a certain range of medical expenses has come to be regarded as the standard range of medical expenses for cancer treatment among oncologists, with answers based on the premise that patients should have access to effective medical treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iwamoto Y (2008) Tax and insurance premiums as financial resources for social security. Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI), Tokyo, pp 1–25

  2. Jones J, Takeda A, Picot J et al (2009) Lapatinib for the treatment of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. Health Technol Assess 13:1–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kato K (2011) Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients. J Clin Surg 66(1):54–59

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2012) Overview of national health expenditures. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-iryohi/12/

  5. Kozminski MA, Neumann PJ, Nadler ES et al (2011) How long and how well: oncologists’ attitudes toward the relative value of life-prolonging v. quality of life-enhancing treatments. Med Decis Mak 31(3):380–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Malin JL, Weeks JC, Potosky AL et al (2013) Medical oncologists’ perceptions of financial incentives in cancer care. J Clin Oncol 31(5):530–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rokuro K (2010) Data health plan by the Japan Health Insurance Association (major diseases by annual health expenditure class and percent distribution of medical care expenditure). Japan Health Insurance Association, Tokyo. http://tokuteikenshin-hokensidou.jp/interview/003/0903_2.pdf

  8. Takahashi K (2015) Selection of cancer treatment method, 3rd edn. Yomiuri Shimbun (Morning), Tokyo, pp 9

  9. American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus (2011) Opinion survey on cancer. http://www.aflac.co.jp/news_pdf/201104262.pdf

  10. Neumann PJ, Palmer JA, Nadler E et al (2010) Cancer therapy costs influence treatment: a national survey of oncologists. Health Aff (Millwood) 29(1):196–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ward S, Pilgrim H, Hind D (2009) Trastuzumab for the treatment of primary breast cancer in HER2-positive women: a single technology appraisal. Health Technol Assess 13:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong YN, Hamilton O, Egleston B et al (2010) Understanding how out-of-pocket expenses, treatment value, and patient characteristics influence treatment choices. Oncologist 15(6):566–576

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Merrill JM (1991) Access to high-tech health care. Ethics Cancer 67(6 Suppl):1750–1752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Takura T (2014) State-of-the-art medicine as industrial policy. Hospitals 73(7):528–533

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their deep appreciation to all trustees of JSCO for their cooperation in this study.

Funding

This research was supported and funded by the 51st Annual Meeting of the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoyuki Takura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takura, T., Fujiya, M., Shimada, Y. et al. Perspectives of Japanese oncologists on the health economics of innovative cancer treatments. Int J Clin Oncol 21, 633–641 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0932-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0932-2

Keywords

Navigation