Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Billroth 1 versus Roux-en-Y reconstructions: a quality-of-life survey at 5 years

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In the majority of gastric surgical units across Japan, Billroth 1 is the preferred method of anastomosis following subtotal distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. However, across Europe and North America, reconstruction using a Roux-en-Y anastomosis is more common. There is a lack of comparative studies of the two methods focusing on long-term outcome. This study evaluated patient outcome, in terms of adverse gastrointestinal complaints and quality of life, at 5 years following surgery.

Methods

A total of 652 patients had a subtotal distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer between January 1993 and December 1999. We studied 229 patients with reconstruction by the Billroth 1 procedure and 214 patients with the Roux-en-Y procedure. All patients had an abdominal ultrasound and endoscopy as part of their follow-up. Quality of life was assessed by questionnaire.

Results

We had an 87% response rate from the questionnaire assessment. The results demonstrated that patients were less likely to experience symptoms of either early or late dumping after Roux-en-Y anastomosis than after Billroth 1. In addition, there were significantly fewer patients with gastritis on endoscopy in the Roux-en-Y group. There was no significant difference in the average relative body weight between the groups. However, patients were more likely to develop gallstones after a Roux-en-Y than after a Billroth 1 reconstruction.

Conclusion

The results from this study show that, at 5 years, both symptomatically and functionally, Roux-en-Y reconstruction was superior to the Billroth I method after subtotal distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. However, the overall outcome in both groups was good, with patient satisfaction scores of around 75% in each group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y Moriwaki C Kunisaki S Kobayashi et al. (2003) ArticleTitleProgressive improvement of prognosis for patients with gastric cancer (dynamic stage grouping) with increasing survival interval from initial staging: how much longer can a given survivor expect to live? Surgery 133 135–140 Occurrence Handle12605173 Occurrence Handle10.1067/msy.2003.95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Y Kodera Y Yamamura Y Kanemitsu et al. (2001) ArticleTitleLymph node metastasis in cancer of the middle-third stomach: criteria for treatment with a pylorus-preserving gastrectomy Surg Today 31 196–203 Occurrence Handle11318120 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s005950170168 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvjsV2jtA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. H Higashi S Natsugoe S Ishigami et al. (2003) ArticleTitleDistribution of lymph node metastasis including micrometastasis in gastric cancer with submucosal invasion World J Surg 27 455–459 Occurrence Handle12658492 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-002-6601-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Y Maehara Y Kakeji S Oda et al. (2000) ArticleTitleTime trends of surgical treatment and the prognosis for Japanese patients with gastric cancer Br J Cancer 83 986–991 Occurrence Handle10993643 Occurrence Handle10.1054/bjoc.2000.1427 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FhvVOruw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. H Itoh Y Oohata K Nakamura et al. (1989) ArticleTitleComplete 10-year postgastrectomy follow-up of early gastric cancer Am J Surg 158 14–16 Occurrence Handle2742043 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(89)90305-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1MzgtV2muw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S Abe Y Ogawa N Nagasue et al. (1984) ArticleTitleEarly gastric cancer: results in a general hospital in Japan World J Surg 8 308–314 Occurrence Handle6464487 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01655060 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2c3ns1aluw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. T Imada Y Rino M Takahashi et al. (1998) ArticleTitlePostoperative functional evaluation of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer compared with conventional distal gastrectomy Surgery 123 165–170 Occurrence Handle9481402 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7kt1Cjsw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. RM Soetikno T Gotoda Y Nakanishi et al. (2003) ArticleTitleEndoscopic mucosal resection Gastrointest Endosc 57 567–579 Occurrence Handle12665775 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mge.2003.130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. T Gotoda M Sasako H Ono et al. (2001) ArticleTitleEvaluation of the necessity for gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for patients with submucosal invasive gastric cancer Br J Surg 88 444–449 Occurrence Handle11260114 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01725.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7msVyhsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. T Yamaguchi D Ichikawa H Kurioka et al. (2004) ArticleTitlePostoperative clinical evaluation following pylorus-preserving gastrectomy Hepatogastroenterology 51 883–886 Occurrence Handle15143939

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. T Sano O Kobori T Muto (1992) ArticleTitleLymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: endoscopic resection of tumour Br J Surg 79 241–244 Occurrence Handle1313325 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800790319 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK383gvVOhsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. T Sano H Katai M Sasako et al. (2002) ArticleTitleOne thousand consecutive gastrectomies without operative mortality Br J Surg 89 123 Occurrence Handle11851682 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387hs1Cjsw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M Sasako (2003) ArticleTitlePrinciples of surgical treatment for curable gastric cancer J Clin Oncol 21 IssueID23 Suppl 274s–275s Occurrence Handle14645409 Occurrence Handle10.1200/JCO.2003.09.172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. T Nakajima (2002) ArticleTitleGastric cancer treatment guidelines in Japan Gastric Cancer 5 1–5 Occurrence Handle12021853 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s101200200000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. PN Rieu JB Jansen I Biemond et al. (1992) ArticleTitleShort-term results of gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y or Billroth II anastomosis for peptic ulcer. A prospective comparative study Hepatogastroenterology 39 22–26 Occurrence Handle1568701 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK383jsVCisQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. H Osugi K Fukuhara N Takada et al. (2004) ArticleTitleReconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy to prevent remnant gastritis Hepatogastroenterology 51 1215–1218 Occurrence Handle15239282 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czjslWktg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Y Adachi N Shiraishi A Shiromizu et al. (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy Arch Surg 135 806–810 Occurrence Handle10896374 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.135.7.806 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czltlaksg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. InstitutionalAuthorNameJapanese Gastric Cancer Association (1998) ArticleTitleJapanese classification of gastric carcinoma – 2nd English edition Gastric Cancer 1 10–24 Occurrence Handle11957040 Occurrence Handle10.1007/PL00011681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. M Kubo M Sasako T Gotoda et al. (2002) ArticleTitleEndoscopic evaluation of the remnant stomach after gastrectomy: proposal for a new classification Gastric Cancer 5 83–89 Occurrence Handle12111583 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s101200200014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. R Tomita S Fujisaki K Tanjoh (2003) ArticleTitlePathophysiological studies on the relationship between postgastrectomy syndrome and gastric emptying function at 5 years after pylorus-preserving distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer World J Surg 27 725–733 Occurrence Handle12734683 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-003-6906-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. I Le Blanc-Louvry P Ducrotte C Peillon et al. (2000) ArticleTitleRoux-en-Y limb motility after total or distal gastrectomy in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients J Am Coll Surg 190 408–417 Occurrence Handle10757378 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00293-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3hvVejtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. I Le Blanc-Louvry P Ducrotte JA Chayvialle et al. (2000) ArticleTitleDistal gastrectomy and Roux-Y limb in the rat: plasma motilin, pancreatic polypeptide concentrations, and duodenojejunal motility Dig Dis Sci 45 1525–1530 Occurrence Handle11007100 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005548524334 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXmvFyisLo%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. BM Meyer BA Werth C Beglinger et al. (1989) ArticleTitleRole of cholecystokinin in regulation of gastrointestinal motor functions Lancet II 12–15 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(89)90255-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. HC van der Mijle H Beekhuis RP Bleichrodt et al. (1993) ArticleTitleTransit disorders of the gastric remnant and Roux limb after Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy: relation to symptomatology and vagotomy Br J Surg 80 60–64 Occurrence Handle8428297 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800800122 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s7ltlGqug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. S Buhner HJ Ehriein G Thoma et al. (1988) ArticleTitleCanine motility and gastric emptying after subtotal gastrectomy Am J Surg 156 194–200 Occurrence Handle3421427 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80065-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1czjvV2jsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. A Viste E Bjornestad P Opheim et al. (1986) ArticleTitleRisk of carcinoma following gastric operations for benign disease. A historical cohort study of 3470 patients Lancet II 502–505 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90368-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. BP van Rees M Tascilar RH Hruban et al. (1999) ArticleTitleRemote partial gastrectomy as a risk factor for pancreatic cancer: potential for preventive strategies Ann Oncol 10 IssueIDSuppl 4 204–207 Occurrence Handle10436823 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008379323440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. G Lundegardh (1988) ArticleTitleCancer of the stomach after operation for benign ulcer disease Ups J Med Sci 93 169–172 Occurrence Handle3206726 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2FosFCguw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.3109/03009738809178540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. R Tomita K Tanjoh S Fujisaki (2004) ArticleTitleNovel operative technique for vagal nerve- and pyloric sphincter-preserving distal gastrectomy reconstructed by interposition of a 5 cm jejunal J pouch with a 3 cm jejunal conduit for early gastric cancer and postoperative quality of life 5 years after operation World J Surg 28 766–774 Occurrence Handle15457356 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-004-6987-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Y Nakane T Michiura K Inoue et al. (2002) ArticleTitleJejunal interposition helps prevent reflux gastritis Hepatogastroenterology 49 1461–1464 Occurrence Handle12239967

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. K Shinoto T Ochiai T Suzuki et al. (2003) ArticleTitleEffectiveness of Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy based on an assessment of biliary kinetics Surg Today 33 169–177 Occurrence Handle12658381 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s005950300039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. M Ishikawa J Kitayama S Kaizaki et al. (2005) ArticleTitleProspective randomized trial comparing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y procedures after distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma World J Surg 29 1415–1420 Occurrence Handle16240061 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-005-7830-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. K Fukuhara H Osugi N Takada et al. (2002) ArticleTitleReconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer that best prevents duodenogastroesophageal reflux World J Surg 26 1452–1457 Occurrence Handle12370787 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-002-6363-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. C Montesani A D'Amato S Santella et al. (2002) ArticleTitleBillroth I versus Billroth II versus Roux-en-Y after subtotal gastrectomy. Prospective [correction of prespective] randomized study Hepatogastroenterology 49 1469–1473 Occurrence Handle12239969

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. JR Mathias A Fernandez CA Sninsky et al. (1985) ArticleTitleNausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain after Roux-en-Y anastomosis: motility of the jejunal limb Gastroenterology 88 101–107 Occurrence Handle3964759 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2M%2Flt1eqtw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. I Kodama C Yoshida K Kofuji et al. (1996) ArticleTitleGallstones and gallbladder disorder after gastrectomy for gastric cancer Int Surg 81 36–39 Occurrence Handle8803703 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28zps1GrsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Y Ikeda K Shinchi S Kono et al. (1995) ArticleTitleRisk of gallstones following gastrectomy in Japanese men Surg Today 25 515–518 Occurrence Handle7579958 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00311307 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fot12lsA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuru Sasako.

About this article

Cite this article

Nunobe, S., Okaro, A., Sasako, M. et al. Billroth 1 versus Roux-en-Y reconstructions: a quality-of-life survey at 5 years. Int J Clin Oncol 12, 433–439 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-007-0706-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-007-0706-6

Key words

Navigation