Advertisement

Population Ecology

, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 301–313 | Cite as

Seasonal changes in community structure along a vertical gradient: patterns and processes in rocky intertidal sessile assemblages

  • Yuki Kanamori
  • Keiichi Fukaya
  • Takashi Noda
Original article
  • 277 Downloads

Abstract

Here we considered two fundamental questions in community ecology regarding the relationship between seasonal changes in community structure and environmental gradients: (i) How does the magnitude of seasonal changes in community structure vary along an environmental gradient? (ii) How do the processes driving seasonal changes in community structure vary along an environmental gradient? To examine these questions, we investigated intertidal sessile assemblages inhabiting a notable vertical environmental gradient and fitted a transition probability matrix model to decadal time series data gathered at 25 plots along the Pacific coast of eastern Hokkaido, Japan. We found that the magnitude of seasonal changes in community structure was the largest at mid shore. The major processes driving seasonal changes in community structure changed vertically, reflecting the indirect influence of vertical changes in the physical environment on the vertical distributions of species. An unexpected finding was that the magnitude of seasonal changes in community structure did not reflect the strength of seasonal variation in the physical environment. One explanation may be that sessile organisms living on the high shore have a broad tolerance to environmental stress and are thus less sensitive to the large seasonal variation in physical stress.

Keyword

Eigenvector sensitivity analysis Environmental gradient Physical disturbance Seasonality Transition probability matrix model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr T. Takada for his mathematical advice. We also thank the many researchers and students who assisted in data collection in the field. This study was made possible by the generous support and encouragement of local fishermen and the fishery office of the Fishermen’s Cooperative Association in Hokkaido. This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grants (nos. 20570012, 24570012, and 15K07208 to TN). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author contribution

YK originally formulated the idea, YK and KF performed statistical analyses, and YK and TN wrote the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10144_2017_596_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (402 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 401 KB)

References

  1. Alam AKMR, Noda T (2016) An experimental evaluation of the direct and indirect effects of endemic seaweeds, barnacles, and invertebrate predators on the abundance of the introduced rocky intertidal barnacle Balanus glandula. Popul Ecol 58:507–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alam AKMR, Hagino T, Fukaya K, Okuda T, Nakaoka M, Noda T (2014) Early phase of the invasion of Balanus glandula along the coast of Eastern Hokkaido: changes in abundance, distribution, and recruitment. Biol Invasions 16:1699–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asakura A (2003) Biogeography. In: Wada K (ed) Ecology of marine benthos. Tokai University Press, Hatano, pp 303–367Google Scholar
  4. Austin MP (1985) Continuum concept, ordination methods, and niche theory. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:29–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazterrica MC, Silliman BR, Hidalgo FJ, Crain CM, Bertness MD (2007) Limpet grazing on a physically stressful Patagonian rocky shore. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 353:22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertness MD, Leonard GH, Levine JM, Schmidt PR, Ingraham AO (1999) Testing the relative contribution of positive and negative interactions in rocky intertidal communities. Ecology 80:2711–2726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bird JM, Hodkinson JD (1999) Species at the edge of their range: the significance of the thermal environment for the distribution of congeneric Craspedolepta species (Sternorrhyncha: Psylloidea) living on Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). Eur J Entomol 96:103–109Google Scholar
  8. Blume E, Bischoff M, Reichert JM, Moorman T, Konopka A, Turco RF (2002) Surface and subsurface microbial biomass, community structure and metabolic activity as a function of soil depth and season. Appl Soil Ecol 20:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bownes S, McQuaid CD (2006) Will the invasive mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck replace the indigenous Perna perna L. on the south coast of South Africa? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 338:140–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bownes S, McQuaid CD (2009) Mechanisms of habitat segregation between an invasive and an indigenous mussel: settlement, post-settlement mortality and recruitment. Mar Biol 156:991–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bownes S, McQuaid CD (2010) Mechanisms of habitat segregation between an invasive (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and an indigenous (Perna perna) mussel: adult growth and mortality. Mar Biol 157:1799–1810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Briggs JC (1995) Global biogeography. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  13. Castenholz RW (1961) The effect of grazing on marine littoral diatom populations. Ecology 42:783–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation, 2nd edn. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapman ARO (1990) Effects of grazing, canopy cover and substratum type on the abundances of common species of seaweeds inhabiting littoral fringe tide pools. Bot Mar 33:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chomsky O, Kamenir Y, Hyams M, Dubinsky Z, Chadwick-Furman NE (2004) Effects of temperature on growth rate and body size in the Mediterranean Sea anemone Actinia equina. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 313:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Connell JH (1961a) Effects of competition, predation by Thais lapillus, and other factors on natural populations of the barnacle Balanus balanoides. Ecol Monogr 31:61–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Connell JH (1961b) The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology 42:710–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Connell JH (1972) Community interactions on marine rocky intertidal shores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 3:169–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cubit J (1984) Herbivory and the seasonal abundance of algae on a high intertidal rocky shore. Ecology 65:1904–1917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dayton PK (1971) Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol Monogr 41:351–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasion by animals and plants. Methuen, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foster BA (1971) Desiccation as a factor in the intertidal zonation of barnacles. Mar Biol 8:12–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frank PW (1965) The biodemography of an intertidal snail population. Ecology 46:831–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fukaya K, Royle JA (2013) Markov models for community dynamics allowing for observation error. Ecology 94:2670–2677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fukaya K, Okuda T, Hori M, Yamamoto T, Nakaoka M, Noda T (2013) Variable processes that determine population growth and an invariant mean-variance relationship of intertidal barnacles. Ecosphere 4:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hedgpeth JW (1957) Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology, vol 1 Ecology. Geological Society of America, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  28. Helmuth BST, Hofmann GE (2001) Microhabitats, thermal heterogeneity, and patterns of physical stress in the rocky intertidal zone. Biol Bull-US 201:374–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hill MF, Witman JD, Caswell H (2004) Markov chain analysis of succession in a rocky subtidal community. Am Nat 164:46–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hori M, Noda T (2001) An unpredictable indirect effect of algal consumption by gulls on crows. Ecology 82:3251–3256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Horvitz C, Schemske DW, Caswell H (1997) The relative “importance” of lifehistory stages to population growth: prospective and retrospective analyses. In: Tuljapurkar S, Caswell H (eds) Structured-population models in marine, terrestrial, and freshwater systems. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 247–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hothorn T, Hornik K (2013) exactRankTests: exact distributions for rank and permutation tests. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=exactRankTests. Accessed 22 Aug 2017
  33. Huan L, Gao S, Xie XJ, Tao WR, Pan GH, Zhang BY, Niu JF, Lin AP, He LW, Wang GC (2014) Specific photosynthetic and morphological characteristics allow macroalgae Gloiopeltis furcata (Rhodophyta) to survive in unfavorable conditions. Photosynthetica 52:281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jernakoff P (1985) An experimental evaluation of the influence of barnacles, crevices and seasonal patterns of grazing on algal diversity and cover in an intertidal barnacle zone. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 88:287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaehler S, Williams GA (1997) Do factors influencing recruitment ultimately determine the distribution and abundance of encrusting algae on seasonal tropical shores? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 156:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Legendre P, Cáceres MD (2013) Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecol Lett 16:951–963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis JR (1964) The ecology of rocky shores. English University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Lubchenco J (1980) Algal zonation in a New England rocky intertidal community: An experimental analysis. Ecology 61:333–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lubchenco J, Cubit J (1980) Heteromorphic life histories of certain marine algae as adaptations to variations in herbivory. Ecology 61:676–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Markham JW (1973) Observations on the ecology of Laminaria sinclairii on three northern Oregon beaches. J Phycol 9:336–341Google Scholar
  41. McCourt RM (1984) Seasonal patterns of abundance, distributions, and phenology in relation to growth strategies of three Sargassum species. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 74:141–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Menge BA (1976) Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: role of predation, competition and environmental heterogeneity. Ecol Monogr 46:355–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Menge BA (1978a) Predation intensity in a rocky intertidal community: effect of an algal canopy, wave action and desiccation on predator feeding rates. Oecologia 34:17–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Menge BA (1978b) Predation intensity in a rocky intertidal community. relation between predator forging activity and environmental harshness. Oecologia 34:1–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Menge BA, Branch GM (2001) Rocky intertidal communities. In: Bertness MD, Gaines SD, Hay ME (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sutherland, Massachusetts, pp 221–225Google Scholar
  46. Menge BA, Sanford E, Daley BA, Freidenburg TL, Hudson G, Lubchenco J (2002) An inter-hemispheric comparison of bottom-up effects on community structure: insights revealed using the comparative-experimental approach. Ecol Res 17:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Munroe DM, Noda T (2009) Spatial pattern of rocky intertidal barnacle recruitment: comparison over multiple tidal levels and years. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 89:345–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Newell RC (1979) Biology of intertidal animals. Paul Elek (Scientific books), Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Noda T (2004) Spatial hierarchical approach in community ecology: a way beyond high context-dependency and low predictability in local phenomena. Popul Ecol 46:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Noda T, Minamiura N, Miyamoto S (2003) Seasonal changes in an intertidal annual algal assemblage in the Northern Japan: the role of preemption and grazing on algal replacement. Ecol Res 18:695–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Norton WJ (1985) The zonation of seaweeds on rocky shores. In: Moore PG, Seed R (eds) The ecology of rocky coasts. Hodder & Stoughton, London, pp 7–21Google Scholar
  52. Paine RT (1971) A short-term experimental investigation of resource partitioning in a New Zealand rocky intertidal system. Ecology 52:1096–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Paine RT (1976) Size-limited predation: an observational and experimental approach with the Mytilus-Pisaster interaction. Ecology 5:858–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paine RT, Levin SA (1981) Intertidal landscapes: disturbance and the dynamics of pattern. Ecol Monogr 51:145–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pineda J, Porri F, Starczak V, Blythe J (2010) Causes of decoupling between larval supply and settlement and consequences for understanding recruitment and population connectivity. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 392:9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Plummer M (2003) JAGS: a program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. Available at: http://mcmc-jags.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 22 Aug 2017
  57. Plummer M (2013) rjags: Bayesian graphical models using MCMC. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rjags. Accessed 22 Aug 2017
  58. R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 22 Aug 2017
  59. Raffaelli D, Hawkins S (1996) Intertidal ecology. Chapman & Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Raimondi PT (1988) Settlement cues and determination of the vertical limit of an intertidal barnacle. Ecology 69:400–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rilov G, Schiel DR (2011) Community regulation: the relative importance of recruitment and predation intensity of an intertidal community dominant in a seascape context. PLOS ONE 6:e23958CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Rius M, McQuaid (2006) Wave action and competitive interaction between the invasive mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis and the indigenous Perna perna in South Africa. Mar Biol 150:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Roberts DA, Hofmann GE, Somero GN (1997) Heat-shock protein expression in Mytilus californianus: acclimatization (seasonal and tidal-height comparisons) and acclimation effects. Biol Bull-UK 192:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Robles C (1982) Disturbance and predation in an assemblage of herbivorous Diptera and algae on rocky shores. Oecologia 54:23–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sandrini-Neto L, Camargo MG (2014) GAD: an R package for ANOVA designs from general principles. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=GAD. Accessed 22 Aug 2017
  66. Sanford E (2002) Water temperature, predation, and the neglected role of physiological rate effects in rocky intertidal communities. Integr Comp Biol 42:881–891CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Sanford E, Bermudez D, Bertness MD, Gaines SD (1994) Flow, food supply and acorn barnacle population dynamics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 104:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schneider KR (2008) Heat stress in the intertidal: comparing survival and growth of an invasive and native mussel under a variety of thermal conditions. Biol Bull 215:253–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Seapy RR, Littler MM (1982) Population and species diversity fluctuations in a rocky intertidal community relative to severe aerial exposure and sediment burial. Mar Biol 71:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sinokrot BA, Stefan HG (1993) Stream temperature dynamics: measurements and modeling. Water Resour Res 29:2299–2312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sousa WP (1979a) Experimental investigation of disturbance and ecological succession in a rocky intertidal algal community. Ecol Monogr 49:227–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sousa WP (1979b) Disturbance in marine intertidal boulder fields: the nonequilibrium maintenance of species diversity. Ecology 60:1225–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stephenson TA, Stephenson A (1972) Life between tidemarks on rocky shores. Freeman, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  74. Sutherland JP (1970) Dynamics of high and low populations of the limpet, Acmaea scabra (Gould). Ecol Monogr 40:169–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tanner JE, Hughes TP, Connell JH (1994) Species coexistence, keystone species, and succession: a sensitivity analysis. Ecology 75:2204–2219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Taylor PR, Littler MM (1982) The roles of compensatory mortality, physical disturbance, and substrate retention in the development and organization of a sand-influenced, rocky-intertidal community. Ecology 63:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Titlyanov EA, Titlyanov TV, Li X, Hansen GI, Huang H (2014) Seasonal changes in the intertidal algal communities of Sanya Bay (Hainan Island, China). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 94:879–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Verhoef HA, Morin PJ (2010) Community ecology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  79. Wethey DS (1979) Demographic variation in intertidal barnacles. Ph. D. Thesis, Univ of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  80. Wheeler RE (2010) lmPerm: permutation tests for linear models. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmPerm. Accessed 22 Aug 2017

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer Japan KK 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.The Institute of Statistical MathematicsTachikawaJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of Environmental Earth ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations