Population Ecology

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 157–168 | Cite as

Movements and source–sink dynamics of a Masai giraffe metapopulation

Original article

Abstract

Spatial variation in habitat quality and anthropogenic factors, as well as social structure, can lead to spatially structured populations of animals. Demographic approaches can be used to improve our understanding of the dynamics of spatially structured populations and help identify subpopulations critical for the long-term persistence of regional metapopulations. We provide a regional metapopulation analysis to inform conservation management for Masai giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi) in five subpopulations defined by land management designations. We used data from an individual-based mark–recapture study to estimate subpopulation sizes, subpopulation growth rates, and movement probabilities among subpopulations. We assessed the source–sink structure of the study population by calculating source–sink statistics, and we created a female-based matrix metapopulation model composed of all subpopulations to examine how variation in demographic components of survival, reproduction, and movement affected metapopulation growth rate. Movement data indicated no subpopulation was completely isolated, but movement probabilities varied among subpopulations. Source–sink statistics and net flow of individuals indicated three subpopulations were sources, while two subpopulations were sinks. We found areas with higher wildlife protection efforts and fewer anthropogenic impacts were sources, and less-protected areas were identified as sinks. Our results highlight the importance of identifying source–sink dynamics among subpopulations for effective conservation planning and emphasize how protected areas can play an important role in sustaining metapopulations.

Keywords

Matrix population model Metapopulation Population dynamics Rescue effect Source–sink 

Supplementary material

10144_2017_580_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (635 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 635 KB)

References

  1. Arnason AN (1973) The estimation of population size, migration rates and survival in a stratified population. Res Popul Ecol 15:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balmford A, Cowling RM (2006) Fusion or failure? The future of conservation biology. Conserv Biol 20:692–695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolger DT, Morrison TA, Vance B, Lee D, Farid H (2012) A computer–assisted system for photographic mark–recapture analysis. Methods Ecol Evol 3:812–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond ML, Strauss MK, Lee DE (2016) Soil correlates and mortality from giraffe skin disease in Tanzania. J Wildl Dis 52:953–958CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonenfant C, Gaillard JM, Coulson T, Festa-Bianchet M, Loison A, Garel M, Loe LE, Blanchard P, Pettorelli N, Owen-Smith N, Du Toit J (2009) Empirical evidence of density–dependence in populations of large herbivores. Adv Ecol Res 41:313–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borner M (1985) The increasing isolation of Tarangire National Park. Oryx 19:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58:445–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown JS, Kotler BP (2004) Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecol Lett 7:999–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brownie C, Hines JE, Nichols JD, Pollock KH, Hestbeck JB (1993) Capture–recapture studies for multiple strata including non-Markovian transitions. Biometrics 1:1173–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models: construction, analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  11. Caughley G (1977) Analysis of vertebrate populations. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  12. Clutton-Brock T, Sheldon BC (2010) Individuals and populations: the role of long-term, individual-based studies of animals in ecology and evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol Evol 25:562–573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Constanti AL, VanBeest FM, Vander Wal E, McLoughlin PD (2013) Identifying hidden sinks in growing populations from individual fates and movements: the feral horses of Sable Island. J Wildl Manage 77:1545–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dagg AI (2014) Giraffe biology, behavior and conservation. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dagg AI, Foster JB (1976) The giraffe: its biology, behavior, and ecology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. de Kroon H, Van Groenendael J, Ehrlén J (2000) Elasticities: a review of methods and model limitations. Ecology 81:607–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delibes M, Gaona P, Ferreras P (2001) Effects of an attractive sink leading into maladaptive habitat selection. Am Nat 158:277–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Driscoll DA (2007) How to find a metapopulation. Can J Zool 85:1031–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fahrig L, Paloheimo J (1988) Determinants of local population size in patchy habitats. Theor Popul Biol 34:194–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foley CAH, Faust LJ (2010) Rapid population growth in an elephant Loxodonta africana population recovering from poaching in Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. Oryx 44:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foster JB (1966) The giraffe of Nairobi National park: home range, sex ratios, the herd, and food. East Afr Wildl J 4:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fryxell JM (1991) Forage quality and aggregation by large herbivores. Am Nat 138:478–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaillard JM, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG (1998) Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends Ecol Evol 13:58–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gamassa DGM (1995) Blockade of wildlife migration corridors by agricultural development in Northern Tanzania. In: Bisonette J, Krausman P (eds) Integrating people and wildlife for a sustainable future. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 609–613Google Scholar
  25. Gilpin ME, Hanski I (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations. Linnaean Society of London and Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodman D (1987) The demography of chance extinction. In: Soulé ME (ed) Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 11–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28:1140–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Griffin PC, Mills LS (2009) Sinks without borders: snowshoe hare dynamics in a complex landscape. Oikos 118:1487–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gunderson G, Johannesen E, Andreassen HP, Ims RA (2001) Source–sink dynamics: how sinks affect demography of sources. Ecol Lett 4:14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanski I, Gilpin M (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Bio J Linnean Soc 42:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harrison S (1994) Metapopulations and conservation. In: Edwards PJ, May RM, Webb N (eds) Large scale ecology and conservation biology. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, pp 111–128Google Scholar
  32. Hess GR (1996) Linking extinction to connectivity and habitat destruction in metapopulation models. Am Nat 148:226–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holt RD (1985) Population dynamics in two–patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theor Pop Biol 28:181–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hood GM (2010) PopTools version 3.2.5. http://www.poptools.org. Accessed 8 Jan 2017
  35. Howe RW, Davis GJ, Mosca V (1991) The demographic significance of ‘sink’ populations. Biol Conserv 57:239–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson DM (2004) Source–sink dynamics in a temporally heterogeneous environment. Ecology 85:2037–2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kendall WL, Bjorkland R (2001) Using open robust design models to estimate temporary emigration from capture–recapture data. Biometrics 57:1113–1122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kendall WL, Pollock KH, Brownie C (1995) A likelihood-based approach to capture–recapture estimation of demographic parameters under the robust design. Biometrics 51:293–308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kiffner C, Peters L, Stroming A, Kioko J (2015) Bushmeat consumption in the Tarangire-Manyara Ecosystem, Tanzania. Trop Conserv Sci 8:318–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lamprey HF (1963) The Tarangire game reserve. Tangan Notes Rec 60:10–22Google Scholar
  41. Lande R, Barrowclough GF (1987) Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management. In: Soulé ME (ed) Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 87–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lebreton J, Nichols JD, Barker RJ, Pradel R, Spendelow JA (2009) Modeling individual animal histories with multistate capture–recapture models. Adv Ecol Res 41:87–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee DE, Bond ML (2016) Precision, accuracy, and costs of survey methods for giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis. J Mammal 97:940–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee DE, Strauss MKL (2016) Giraffe demography and population ecology. Reference module in earth systems and environmental sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09721-9. Accessed 15 Apr 2017, Available via Science Direct
  45. Lee DE, Bond ML, Kissui BM, Kiwango YA, Bolger DT (2016) Spatial variation in giraffe demography: a test of two paradigms. J Mammal 97:1015–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull Entomol SocAm 15:237–240Google Scholar
  47. Lidicker WZ (1975) The role of dispersal in the demography of small mammals. In: Galley FB, Petrusewicz K, Ryszkowski L (eds) Small mammals: their productivity and population dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 103–128Google Scholar
  48. Lowe WH (2003) Linking dispersal to local population dynamics: a case study using a headwater salamander system. Ecology 84:2145–2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Martin K, Stacey PB, Braun CE (2000) Recruitment, dispersal, and demographic rescue in spatially–structured white-tailed ptarmigan populations. Condor 102:503–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Merriam G (1991) Corridors and connectivity: animal populations in heterogeneous environments. In: Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Nature conservation 2: the role of corridors. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, pp 133–142Google Scholar
  51. Morrison TA, Bolger DT (2012) Wet season range fidelity in a tropical migratory ungulate. J Anim Ecol 81:543–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Morrison TA, Link WA, Newmark WD, Foley CAH, Bolger DT (2016) Tarangire revisited: Consequences of declining connectivity in a tropical ungulate population. Biol Conserv 197:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Msoffe FU, Kifugo SC, Said MY, Ole Neselle M, Van Gardingen P, Said RS, Ogutu JO, Herero M, de Leeuw J (2011) Drivers and impacts of land-use change in the Maasai Steppe of northern Tanzania: an ecological, social, and political analysis. J Land Use 6:261–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Naranjo EJ, Bodmer RE (2007) Source–sink systems and conservation of hunted ungulates in the Lacandon Forest, Mexico. Biol Conserv 138:412–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nelson F, Foley C, Foley LS, Leposo A, Loure E, Peterson D, Peterson M, Peterson T, Sachedina H, Williams A (2010) Payments for ecosystem services as a framework for community-based conservation in Northern Tanzania. Conserv Biol 24:78–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Nichols JD, Hines JE, Lebreton J–D, Pradel R (2000) Estimation of contributions to population growth: a reverse-time capture–recapture approach. Ecology 81:3362–3376Google Scholar
  57. Ozgul A, Oli MK, Armitage KB, Blumstein DT, Van Vuren DH (2009) Influence of local demography on asymptotic and transient dynamics of a yellow-bellied marmot metapopulation. Am Nat 173:517–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Pollock KH (1982) A capture–recapture design robust to unequal probability of capture. J Wildl Manage 46:752–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pradel R (1996) Utilization of capture–mark–recapture for the study of recruitment and population growth rate. Biometrics 52:703–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Prins HHT, Loth PE (1988) Rainfall patterns as background to plant phenology in northern Tanzania. J Biogeogr 15:451–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pulliam H (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pulliam HR, Danielson BJ (1991) Sources, sinks and habitat selection—a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am Nat 137:S50–S66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. R Core Development Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  64. Robertson BA, Hutto RL (2006) A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 87:1075–1085CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Rodenhouse NL, Sherry TW, Holmes RT (1997) Site–dependent regulation of population size: a new synthesis. Ecology 78:2025–2042Google Scholar
  66. Roy M, Holt RD, Barfield M (2005) Temporal autocorrelation can enhance the persistence and abundance of metapopulations comprised of coupled sinks. Am Nat 166:246–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Runge JP, Runge MC, Nichols JD (2006) The role of local populations within a landscape context: defining and classifying sources and sinks. Am Nat 167:925–938CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Sanderlin JS, Waser PM, Hines JE, Nichols JD (2012) On valuing patches: estimating contributions to metapopulation growth with reverse-time capture–recapture modelling. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:480–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schwarz CJ, Stobo WT (1997) Estimating temporary immigration using the robust design. Biometrics 53:178–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sinclair ARE, Fryxell JM, Caughley G (2006) Wildlife ecology, conservation, and management, 2nd edn. Wiley–Blackwell, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  71. Stacey PB, Taper M (1992) Environmental variation and the persistence of small populations. Ecol Appl 2:18–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Stoner C, Caro T, Mduma S, Mlingwa C, Sabuni G, Borner M, Schelten C (2006) Changes in large herbivore populations across large areas of Tanzania. Afr J Ecol 45:202–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stoner C, Caro T, Mduma S, Mlingwa C, Sabuni G, Borner M (2007) Assessment of effectiveness of protection strategies in Tanzania based on a decade of survey data for large herbivores. Conserv Biol 21:635–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Strauss MKL, Kilewo M, Rentsch D, Packer C (2015) Food supply and poaching limit giraffe abundance in the Serengeti. Popul Ecol 57:505–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sutherland C, Elston DA, Lambin X (2012) Multi-scale processes in metapopulations: contributions of stage structure, rescue effect, and correlated extinctions. Ecology 93:2465–2473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Thomas CD, Kunin WE (1999) The spatial structure of populations. J Anim Ecol 68:647–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Turgeon K, Kramer DL (2012) Compensatory immigration depends on adjacent population size and habitat quality but not on landscape connectivity. J Anim Ecol 81:1161–1170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Vie´ J-C, Hilton-Taylor C, Stuart SN (2009) Wildlife in a changing world—an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  79. Virgl JA, Messier F (2000) Assessment of source–sink theory for predicting demographic rates among habitats that exhibit temporal changes in quality. Can J Zool 78:1483–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Western D, Russell S, Cuthill I (2009) The status of wildlife in protected areas compared to non-protected areas of Kenya. PLoS One 4(7):e6140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(Supplement):120–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Woodroffe R, Ginsberg JR (1998) Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280:2126–2128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer Japan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental StudiesDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA
  3. 3.Wild Nature InstituteConcordUSA

Personalised recommendations