Population Ecology

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 507–514 | Cite as

An experimental evaluation of the direct and indirect effects of endemic seaweeds, barnacles, and invertebrate predators on the abundance of the introduced rocky intertidal barnacle Balanus glandula

Original article

Abstract

The barnacle, Balanus glandula has recently invaded along the Pacific coast of eastern Hokkaido, Japan. To evaluate the direct and indirect effects of endemic seaweeds, barnacles, and invertebrate predators on the abundance of B. glandula on the rocky intertidal coast of eastern Hokkaido, we conducted a field experiment from June 2011 to October 2012 in which we manipulated the presence or absence of these factors. Seaweeds showed no significant effect on the abundance of B. glandula. The endemic barnacle Chthamalus dalli and the invertebrate predator Nucella lima reduced the abundance of B. glandula. However, the simultaneous influence of N. lima and C. dalli was compensative rather than additive, probably due to keystone predation. These findings suggest that competition by the endemic barnacle C. dalli and predation by the invertebrate predator N. lima decreased the abundance of B. glandula, but that N. lima predation on C. dalli weakened the negative influence of C. dalli on B. glandula. The implications of these findings are twofold: the endemic competitor and invertebrate predator may have played important roles in decreasing the abundance of B. glandula in natural habitats, and conservation of endemic invertebrate predators may be crucial to impede the establishment and survival of introduced barnacles in rocky intertidal habitats.

Keywords

Competition Indirect effect Invasion success Macrobenthos Predation Rocky intertidal 

References

  1. Abrams P, Menge BA, Mittelbach GG, Spiller D, Yodzis P (1996) The role of indirect effects in food webs. In: Polis G, Winemiller K (eds) Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 371–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alam AKMR, Hagino T, Fukaya K, Okuda T, Nakaoka M, Noda T (2014) Early phase of the invasion of Balanus glandula along the coast of Eastern Hokkaido: changes in abundance, distribution, and recruitment. Biol Inv 16:1699–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen BM, Power AM, O’Riordan RM, Myers AA, McGrath D (2006) Increases in the abundance of the invasive barnacle Elminius modestus Darwin in Ireland. Biol Environ Proc Roy Irish Acad 106:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altieri AH, Wesenbeeck BKV, Bertness MD, Brian R (2010) Facilitation cascade drives positive relationship between native biodiversity and invasion success. Ecology 91:1269–1275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett BE (1979) A laboratory study of predation by dogwhelk Nucella lapillus on the barnacles Elminius modestus and Balanus balanoides. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 59:299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berlow EL (1999) Strong effects of weak interactions in ecological communities. Nature 398:330–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertness MD, Leonard GH, Levine JM, Schmidt PR, Ingraham AO (1999) Testing the relative contribution of positive and negative interactions in rocky intertidal communities. Ecology 80:2711–2726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlton JT, Newman WA, Pitombo FB (2011) Barnacle invasions: introduced, cryptogenic, and range expanding Cirripedia of North and South America. In: Galil BS, Clark PF, Carlton JT (eds) In the wrong place—alien marine crustaceans: distribution, biology and impacts, invading nature, Springer Series in Invasion Ecology 6. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 159–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connell JH (1970) A predator-prey system in the marine intertidal region. 1. Balanus glandula and several predatory species of Thais. Ecol Monogr 40:49–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dayton PK (1971) Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol Monogr 41:351–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denley EJ, Underwood AJ (1979) Experiments on factors influencing settlement, survival, and growth of two species of barnacles in New South Wales. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 36:279–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dumont CP, Gaymer CF, Thiel M (2011) Predation contributes to invasion resistance of benthic communities against the non-indigenous tunicate Ciona intestinalis. Biol Inv 13:2023–2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farrell TM (1991) Models and mechanisms of succession: an example from a rocky intertidal community. Ecol Monogr 61:95–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fukaya K, Okuda T, Hori M, Yamamoto T, Nakaoka M, Noda T (2013) Variable processes that determine population growth and an invariant mean-variance relationship of intertidal barnacles. Ecosphere 4:1–20 (Art 48) Google Scholar
  15. Geller JB, Sotka EE, Kado R, Palumbi SR, Schwindt E (2008) Sources of invasions of a northeastern Pacific acorn barnacle, Balanus glandula, in Japan and Argentina. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 358:211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harley CDG, O’Riley JL (2011) Non-linear density-dependent effects of an intertidal ecosystem engineer. Oecologia 166:531–541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hori M, Noda T (2001) Spatio-temporal variation of avian foraging in the rocky intertidal food web. J Anim Ecol 70:122–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jara HF, Moreno CA (1984) Herbivory and structure in midlittoral rocky community: a case in Southern Chile. Ecology 65:28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jernakoff P (1985) The effect of overgrowth by algae on the survival of the intertidal barnacle Tesseropora rosea Krauss. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 94:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kado R (2003) Invasion of Japanese shores by the NE Pacific barnacle Balanus glandula and its ecological and biogeographical impacts. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 249:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laird MC, Griffiths CL (2008) Present distribution and abundance of the introduced barnacle Balanus glandula Darwin in South Africa. Afr J Mar Sci 30:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leonard GH (2000) Latitudinal variation in species interactions: a test in the New England rocky intertidal zone. Ecology 81:1015–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leonard GH, Ewanchuk PJ, Bertness MD (1999) How recruitment, intraspecific interactions and predation control species borders in a tidal estuary. Oecologia 118:492–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Menge BA (1972) Competition for food between two intertidal starfish species and its effects on body size and feeding. Ecology 53:635–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Menge BA (1976) Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: role of predation, competition and environmental heterogeneity. Ecol Monogr 46:355–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Menge BA (1978) Predation intensity in a rocky intertidal community. Oecologia 34:17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Menge BA (1995) Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interaction webs: patterns and importance. Ecol Monogr 65:21–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Menge BA (1997) Detection of direct versus indirect effects: were experiments long enough? Am Nat 149:801–823CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Menge BA, Berlow EA, Blanchette CA, Navarrete SA, Yamada SB (1994) The keystone species concept: variation in interaction strength in a rocky intertidal habitat. Ecol Monogr 64:249–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Munroe DM, Noda T (2010) Physical and biological factors contributing to changes in the relative importance of recruitment to population dynamics in open populations. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 412:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakaoka M, Ito N, Yamamoto T, Okuda T, Noda T (2006) Similarity of rocky intertidal assemblages along the Pacific coast of Japan: effects of spatial scales and geographic distance. Ecol Res 21:425–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Navarrete SA (1996) Variable predation: effects of whelks on a mid-intertidal successional community. Ecol Monogr 66:301–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Noda T, Minamiura N, Miyamoto Y (2003) Seasonal changes in an intertidal annual algal assemblage in northern Japan: the role of pre-emption and grazing on algal replacement. Ecol Res 18:695–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Okuda T, Noda T, Yamamoto T, Ito T, Nakaoka M (2004) Latitudinal gradient of species diversity: multi-scale variability in rocky intertidal sessile assemblages along the northeast Pacific coast. Popul Ecol 46:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Palmer AR (1984) Prey selection by thaidid gastropods: some observational and experimental field tests of foraging models. Oecologia 62:162–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Petren K, Case TJ (1996) An experimental demonstration of exploitation competition in an ongoing invasion. Ecology 77:118–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Poloczanska ES, Hawkins SJ, Southward AJ, Burrows MT (2008) Modeling the response of populations of competing species to climate change. Ecology 89:3138–3149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  39. Reusch TBH (1998) Native predators contribute to invasion resistance to the non-indigenous bivalve Musculista senhousia in Southern California. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 170:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schoener TW, Spiller DA (1995) Effect of predators and area on invasion: an experiment with island spiders. Science 267:1811–1813CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Schwindt E (2007) The invasion of the acorn barnacle Balanus glandula in the south-western Atlantic 40 years later. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 87:1219–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simkanin C, Dower JF, Filip N, Jamieson G, Therriault TW (2013) Biotic resistance to the infiltration of natural benthic habitats: examining the role of predation in the distribution of the invasive ascidian Botrylloides violaceus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 439:76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Southward AJ, Burton RS, Coles SL, Dando PR, DeFelice RC, Hoover J, Parnell PE, Yamaguchi T, Newman WA (1998) Invasion of Hawaiian shores by an Atlantic barnacle. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 165:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stachowicz JJ, Byrnes JJ (2006) Species diversity, invasion success, and ecosystem functioning: disentangling the influence of resource competition, facilitation, and extrinsic factors. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 311:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stachowicz JJ, Fried H, Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (2002) Biodiversity, invasion resistance, and marine ecosystem function: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 83:2575–2590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stanley SM, Newman WA (1980) Competitive exclusion in evolutionary time: the case of the acorn barnacles. Paleobiology 6:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Underwood AJ, Denley EJ, Moran MJ (1983) Experimental analyses of the structure and dynamics of mid-shore rocky intertidal communities in New South Wales. Oecologia 56:202–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. West L (1986) Interindividual variation in prey selection by the snail Nucella (=Thais) emarginata. Ecology 67:798–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. White EM, Wilson JC, Clarke AR (2006) Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology. Divers Distrib 12:443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental designs, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, KogakushaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Environmental SciencesJahangirnagar UniversityDhakaBangladesh
  3. 3.Faculty of Environmental Earth ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations