Population Ecology

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 53–62 | Cite as

Spatial capture–recapture models allowing Markovian transience or dispersal

  • J. Andrew RoyleEmail author
  • Angela K. Fuller
  • Chris Sutherland
Original article


Spatial capture–recapture (SCR) models are a relatively recent development in quantitative ecology, and they are becoming widely used to model density in studies of animal populations using camera traps, DNA sampling and other methods which produce spatially explicit individual encounter information. One of the core assumptions of SCR models is that individuals possess home ranges that are spatially stationary during the sampling period. For many species, this assumption is unlikely to be met and, even for species that are typically territorial, individuals may disperse or exhibit transience at some life stages. In this paper we first conduct a simulation study to evaluate the robustness of estimators of density under ordinary SCR models when dispersal or transience is present in the population. Then, using both simulated and real data, we demonstrate that such models can easily be described in the BUGS language providing a practical framework for their analysis, which allows us to evaluate movement dynamics of species using capture–recapture data. We find that while estimators of density are extremely robust, even to pathological levels of movement (e.g., complete transience), the estimator of the spatial scale parameter of the encounter probability model is confounded with the dispersal/transience scale parameter. Thus, use of ordinary SCR models to make inferences about density is feasible, but interpretation of SCR model parameters in relation to movement should be avoided. Instead, when movement dynamics are of interest, such dynamics should be parameterized explicitly in the model.


Animal movement Density estimation Dispersal  Spatial capture–recapture Spatially explicit capture–recapture Transience 



Preliminary results of this research were presented by the authors at the 2014 Graybill/ENVR Conference: Modern Statistical Methods for Ecology, held September 7–10, 2014 at Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. We thank Michael Schaub and 2 anonymous referees for their thoughtful reviews of the manuscript. Part of this research was performed using the ATLAS HPC Cluster, a compute cluster with 672 cores, 4 Tesla M2090 GPU accelerators, supported by NSF grants (Award # 1059284 and 0832782).

Supplementary material

10144_2015_524_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (265 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 265 KB)
10144_2015_524_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (196 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (pdf 196 KB)
10144_2015_524_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (197 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (pdf 197 KB)


  1. Arnason AN (1973) The estimation of population size, migration rates and survival in a stratified population. Res Popul Ecol 15:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belda EJ, Barba E, Monros JS (2007) Resident and transient dynamics, site fidelity and survival in wintering Blackcaps Sylvia atricapilla: evidence from capture–recapture analyses. Ibis 149:396–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borchers DL (2012) A non-technical overview of spatially explicit capture–recapture models. J Ornithol 152:435–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borchers DL, Efford MG (2008) Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture–recapture studies. Biometrics 64:377–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borchers DL, Distiller G, Foster R, Harmsen B, Milazzo L (2014) Continuous-time spatially explicit capture–recapture models, with an application to a jaguar camera-trap survey. Methods Ecol Evol 5:656–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borger L, Dalziel BD, Fryxell JM (2008) Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behavior? A review and prospects for future research. Ecol Lett 11:637–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks S, Gelman A (1998) General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J Comput Graph Stat 7:434–455Google Scholar
  8. Caro TM (1994) Cheetahs of the Serengeti Plains: group living of an asocial species. University of Chicago press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandler RB, Royle JA (2013) Spatially explicit models for inference about density in unmarked or partially marked populations. Ann Appl Stat 7:936–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chandler RB, Clark JD (2014) Spatially explicit integrated population models. Methods Ecol Evol 5:1351–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clobert J, Baguette M, Benton TG, Bullock JM, Ducatez S (eds) (2012) Dispersal ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Constantine R, Jackson JA, Steel D, Baker CS, Brooks L, Burns D, Clapham P, Hauser N, Madon B, Mattila D, Oremus M, Poole M, Robbins J, Thompson K, Garrigue C (2012) Abundance of humpback whales in Oceania using photo-identification and microsatellite genotyping. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 453:249–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Efford M (2004) Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos 106:598–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Efford MG, Dawson DK, Borchers DL (2009) Population density estimated from locations of individuals on a passive detector array. Ecology 90:2676–2682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ergon T, Gardner B (2014) Separating mortality and emigration: modelling space use, dispersal and survival with robust-design spatial capture–recapture data. Methods Ecol Evol 5:1327–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuller AK, Harrison DJ (2005) Influence of partial timber harvesting on American martens in north-central Maine. J Wildl Manag 69:710–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fuller AK, Harrison DJ, Vashon JH (2007) Winter habitat selection by Canada lynx in Maine: prey abundance or accessibility? J Wildl Manag 71:1980–1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuller AK, Sutherland CS, Royle JA, Hare MP (2015) Estimating population density and connectivity of American mink using spatial capture–recapture. Ecol Apps. doi: 10.1890/15-0315.1
  19. Gardner B, Royle JA, Wegan MT, Rainbolt RE, Curtis PD (2010) Estimating black bear density using DNA data from hair snares. J Wildl Manag 74:318–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gehrt SD, Anchor C, White LA (2009) Home range and landscape use of coyotes in a metropolitan landscape: conflict or coexistence? J Mammal 90:1045–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hestbeck JB, Nichols JD, Malecki RA (1991) Estimates of movement and site fidelity using mark-resight data of wintering Canada geese. Ecology 72:523–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hines JE, Kendall WL, Nichols JD (2003) On the use of the robust design with transient capture–recapture models. The Auk 120:1151–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kéry M, Schaub M (2012) Bayesian population analysis using WinBUGS–a hierarchical perspective. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Moorcroft PR, Lewis MA, Crabtree RL (2006) Mechanistic home range models capture spatial patterns and dynamics of coyote territories in Yellowstone. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273(1594):1651–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perret N, Pradel R, Miaud C, Grolet O, Joly P (2003) Transience, dispersal and survival rates in newt patchy populations. J Anim Ecol 72:567–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Plummer M (2003) JAGS: a program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on distributed statistical computing, vol 124, p 125, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  27. Pradel R, Hines JE, Lebreton JD, Nichols JD (1997) Capture–recapture survival models taking account of transients. Biometrics 53:60–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rohner C (1997) Non-territorial ‘floaters’ in great horned owls: space use during a cyclic peak of snowshoe hares. Anim Behav 53:901–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Royle JA, Young KV (2008) A hierarchical model for spatial capture–recapture data. Ecology 89:2281–2289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Royle JA, Dorazio RM, Link WA (2007) Analysis of multinomial models with unknown index using data augmentation. J Comput Graph Stat 16:67–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Royle JA, Chandler RB, Sun CC, Fuller AK (2013a) Integrating resource selection information with spatial capture–recapture. Methods Ecol Evol 4:520–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Royle JA, Chandler RB, Gazenski KD, Graves TA (2013b) Spatial capture–recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity. Ecology 94:287–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Royle JA, Chandler RB, Sollmann R, Gardner B (2014) Spatial capture–recapture. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Royle JA, Sutherland C, Fuller AK, Sun CC (2015) Likelihood analysis of spatial capture–recapture models for stratified or class structured populations. Ecosphere 6:art22Google Scholar
  35. Saracco JF, Royle JA, DeSante DF, Gardner B (2010) Modeling spatial variation in avian survival and residency probabilities. Ecology 91:1885–1891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sasso CR, Braun-McNeill J, Avens L, Epperly SP (2006) Effects of transients on estimating survival and population growth in juvenile loggerhead turtles. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 324:287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schaub M, Royle JA (2014) Estimating true instead of apparent survival using spatial Cormack–Jolly–Seber models. Methods Ecol Evol 5:1316–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sollmann R, Gardner B, Parsons AW, Stocking JJ, McClintock BT, Simons TR, Pollock KH, O’Connell AF (2013) A spatial mark-resight model augmented with telemetry data. Ecology 94:553–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sutherland C, Elston DA, Lambin X (2013) Accounting for false positive detection error induced by transient individuals. Wildl Res 40:490–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sutherland C, Fuller AK, Royle JA (2015) Modelling non-Euclidean movement and landscape connectivity in highly structured ecological networks. Methods Ecol Evol 6:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tufto J, Lande R, Rignsby TH, Engen S, Saether BE, Walla TR, DeVries PJ (2012) Estimating Brownian motion dispersal rate, longevity and population density from spatially explicit mark-recapture data on tropical butterflies. J Anim Ecol 81:756–769PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer Japan (outside the USA)  2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Andrew Royle
    • 1
    Email author
  • Angela K. Fuller
    • 2
  • Chris Sutherland
    • 3
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyPatuxent Wildlife Research CenterLaurelUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological Survey, New York Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Natural ResourcesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Environmental ConservationUniversity of MassachusettesAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations