Advertisement

Population Ecology

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 63–80 | Cite as

Sampling inspection to prevent the invasion of alien pests: statistical theory of import plant quarantine systems in Japan

  • Kohji YamamuraEmail author
  • Hajime Katsumata
  • Junji Yoshioka
  • Tatsuya Yuda
  • Kenji Kasugai
Original article

Abstract

The establishment of appropriate import quarantine systems is the best known method for preventing the unintentional introduction of invasive alien pests. However, quarantine systems are sometimes judged as non-tariff barriers against trade by the World Trade Organization. The construction of a common scientific theory for quarantine systems is thus extremely important to prevent invasion without causing international conflict. We explain several statistical theories that have been adopted in import plant quarantine systems in Japan. Quarantine systems include three major components: (1) import sampling inspection, (2) early detection procedures, and (3) emergency control. We first explain the principle of risk management that was commonly adopted in these components. Then, we explain the method for calculating the required sample size in the import sampling inspection. We then explain hierarchical sampling inspection for detecting alien pests inside Japan. We further explain the theory for declaring the eradication of invasive alien pests as an emergency control. Actual examples of quarantine actions against the invasion of plum pox virus disease and citrus huanglongbing are discussed.

Keywords

Citrus huanglongbing Early detection Emergency control Plum pox virus Risk management Sample size 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous referees for the comments that greatly helped to improve the manuscript. This work was supported in part by the program for Developing Practical Technologies for Promoting Innovative AFF Policy (No. 22015) from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.

References

  1. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2014) CBD toolkit: a toolkit to facilitate parties to achieve Aichi biodiversity target 9 on invasive alien species (prototype), Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.cbd.int/invasive/cbdtoolkit/. Accessed 5 Jan 2015
  2. Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Deming WE (1950) Some theory of sampling. General Publishing, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  4. Department of Defense (1963) MIL-STD-105D: sampling procedures and tables for inspection by attributes. United States Department of Defense, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Department of Defense (1996) MIL-STD-1916: DoD preferred methods for acceptance of product. United States Department of Defense, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Dodge HF (1943) A sampling plan for continuous production. Ann Math Stat 14:264–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dodge HF (1969) Notes on the evolution of acceptance sampling plans, part I. J Qual Technol 1:77–88Google Scholar
  8. Dodge HF, Torrey MN (1951) Additional continuous sampling inspection plans. Ind Qual Control 7:7–12Google Scholar
  9. EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization) (2006) Sampling of consignments for visual phytosanitary inspection. OEPP/EPPO Bull 36:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher RA (1926) The arrangement of field experiments. J Minist Agric Great Br 33:503–513Google Scholar
  11. Freeman HA (1948) Sampling inspection: principles, procedures and tables for single, double and sequential sampling in acceptance, inspection and quality controlled based on percent defective. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Fujii S (ed) (2015) Beyond global capitalism. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Fukasawa K, Hashimoto T, Tatara M, Abe S (2013) Reconstruction and prediction of invasive mongoose population dynamics from history of introduction and management: a Bayesian state-space modelling approach. J Appl Ecol 50:469–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerrard DJ, Chiang HC (1970) Density estimation of corn rootworm egg populations based upon frequency of occurrence. Ecology 51:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gottwald TR (2010) Current epidemiological understanding of citrus huanglongbing. Annu Rev Phytopathol 48:119–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gottwald TR, Aubert B, Xue-Yuan Z (1989) Preliminary analysis of citrus greening (huanglungbin) epidemics in the People’s Republic of China and French Reunion Island. Phytopathology 79:687–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hubbard R, Bayarri MJ (2003) Confusion over measures of evidence (p’s) versus errors (α’s) in classical statistical testing. Am Stat 57:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hughes G, Gottwald TR, Yamamura K (2002) Survey methods for assessment of Citrus tristeza virus incidence in urban citrus populations. Plant Dis 86:367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IPPC (1998) Guidelines for pest eradication programmes (ISPM no. 9). International Plant Protection Convention, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  20. IPPC (2008) Methodologies for sampling of consignments (ISPM no. 31). International Plant Protection Convention, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  21. IPPC (2009a) Glossary of phytosanitary terms (ISPM no. 5). International Plant Protection Convention, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  22. IPPC (2009b) Categorization of commodities according to their pest risk (ISPM no. 32). International Plant Protection Convention, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  23. ISO (1995) ISO 2859-0: sampling procedures for inspection by attributes—part 0: introduction to the ISO 2859 attribute sampling system. International Organization for Standardization, GenèveGoogle Scholar
  24. ISO (1999) ISO 2859-1: sampling procedures for inspection by attributes—part 1: sampling schemes indexed by acceptance quality limit (AQL) for lot-by-lot inspection. International Organization for Standardization, GenèveGoogle Scholar
  25. ISO (2006a) ISO 3534-2: statistics—vocabulary and symbols—part 2: applied statistics. International Organization for Standardizatio, GenèveGoogle Scholar
  26. ISO (2006b) ISO 8422: sequential sampling plans for inspection by attributes. International Organization for Standardization, GenèveGoogle Scholar
  27. ISO (2009) ISO guide 73: risk management—vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization, GenèveGoogle Scholar
  28. Iwasaki M (2005) Rule of 3 and related topics. In: Proceedings of the 2005 symposium of the Biometric Society of Japan. Biometric Society of Japan, Tokyo, pp 1–2 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  29. Japan Plant Quarantine Association (2009) Plant protection law and regulations relevant to plant quarantine. Japan Plant Quarantine Association, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  30. Japanese Industrial Standards Committee (1954) JIS Z 8601: preferred numbers. Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  31. Japanese Industrial Standards Committee (1956a) JIS Z 9002: single sampling inspection plans having desired operation characteristics. Part 1. Sampling by attributes. Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  32. Japanese Industrial Standards Committee (1956b) JIS Z 9006: single sampling inspection plans with screening by attributes. Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  33. Jovanovic BD, Levy PS (1997) A look at the rule of three. Am Stat 51:137–139Google Scholar
  34. Kasugai K (2010) Emergence of plum pox virus, and the protection against the invasion. Pest Information from Plant Protection Station 90:1–2. http://www.maff.go.jp/pps/j/guidance/pestinfo/pdf/pestinfo_90_01.pdf. Accessed 7 Jan 2015 (in Japanese)
  35. Kiritani K (2001) Invasive insect pests and plant quarantine in Japan. Food Fertil Technol Center Ext Bull 498:1–12Google Scholar
  36. Kiritani K, Morimoto N (2004) Invasive insect and nematode pests from North America. Global Environ Res 8:75–88Google Scholar
  37. Kiritani K, Yamamura K (2003) Exotic insects and their pathways for invasion. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (eds) Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 44–67Google Scholar
  38. Kono T, Sugino T (1958) On the estimation of the density of rice stems infested by the rice stem borer. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 2:184–188 (in Japanese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuno E (1991) Verifying zero–infestation in pest control: a simple sequential test based on the succession of zero sample. Res Popul Ecol 33:29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lang T, Hines C (1993) The new protectionism: protecting the future against free trade. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. McNeely JA, Mooney HA, Neville LE, Schei PJ, Waage JK (eds) (2001) Global strategy on invasive alien species. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  42. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2010) Biosecurity New Zealand, standard 155.02.06, importation of nursery stock. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Biosecurity New Zealand, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  43. Nachman G (1984) Estimates of mean population density and spatial distribution of Tetranychus urticae (Acarina: Tetranychidae) and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) based upon the proportion of empty sampling units. J Appl Ecol 21:903–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. NAPPO (2004) RSPM no. 18: guidelines for phytosanitary action following detection of plum pox virus. The Secretariat of the North American Plant Protection Organization, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  45. Plant Protection Station (2014) Functions of the plant protection station. Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries, Japan. http://www.pps.go.jp/english/jobs/index.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2015
  46. Prefecture Kagoshima (2012) Report on the emergency control of HLB in Kikai Island. Kagoshima Prefecture, Oshima Branch, Amami (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  47. Robinson A, Cannon R, Mudford R (2011) DAFF biosecurity quarantine operations risk return, ACERA 1001 study I, performance indicators report 1. Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  48. Robinson A, Bell J, Woolcott B, Perotti E (2012) AQIS quarantine operations risk return, ACERA 1001 study J, imported plant-product pathways, final report. Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson A, Woolcott B, Holmes P, Dawes A, Sibley J, Porter L, Kirkham J (2013) Plant quarantine inspection and auditing across the biosecurity continuum: ACERA 1101C, final report. Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  50. Sakurai H (2012) The first book of shrine. Gentosha, Tokyo (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  51. Shinohara K, Kamimuro T, Totokawa N, Horie H, Ogawa Y, Matuhira K, Miyaji K, Kamifukumoto A (2009) Effect of simultaneous control with pesticide (thiamethoxam SP10%) on Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, in Kikai Island. Shokubutsu Boeki (Plant Protection) 63:503–507 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  52. Society of Risk Analysis (2013) Glossary of risk analysis terms. http://www.sra.org/sites/default/files/docs/SRA_Glossary.pdf. Accessed 7 Jan 2015
  53. Stephens KS (2001) The handbook of applied acceptance sampling: plans, procedures and principles. ASQ Quality Press, MilwaukeeGoogle Scholar
  54. Sueishi T (2000) Risk vs. safety. In: Society for risk analysis: Japan-section (ed) Handbook of risk research. TBS Britannica, Tokyo, pp 16–17 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  55. Takase T (1997) GATT: 29 years’ view from the GATT office. Chuokoron-sha, Tokyo (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  56. Taylor LR (1961) Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature 189:732–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Upton G, Cook I (2008) A dictionary of statistics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. USDA (2010) Fresh fruits and vegetables import manual. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  59. USDA (2011) Agriculture quarantine inspection monitoring (AQIM) handbook. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  60. van Belle G (2002) Statistical rules of thumb. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Venette RC, Moon RD, Hutchinson WD (2002) Strategies and statistics of sampling for rare individuals. Annu Rev Entomol 47:143–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wittenberg R, Cock MJW (eds) (2001) A toolkit of best prevention and management practices. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  63. WTO (1994) Agreement on the application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures. World Trade Organization. http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/15-sps.pdf. Accessed 7 Jan 2015
  64. WTO (2003) Japan—measures affecting the importation of apples (AB-2003-4): report of the appellate body. World Trade Organization. http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/wto/cases/WTDS245ABR.pdf. Accessed 7 Jan 2015
  65. Yamada F, Sugimura K (2004) Negative impact of an invasive small Indian mongoose Herpestes javanicus on native wildlife species and evaluation of a control project in Amami-Ohshima and Okinawa Islands, Japan. Global Environ Res 8:117–124Google Scholar
  66. Yamamura K (2000) Colony expansion model for describing the spatial distribution of populations. Popul Ecol 42:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yamamura K, Ishimoto M (2009) Optimal sample size for composite sampling with subsampling, when estimating the proportion of pecky rice grains in a field. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 14:135–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yamamura K, Katsumata H (1999a) Estimation of the probability of insect pest introduction through imported commodities. Res Popul Ecol 41:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yamamura K, Katsumata H (1999b) Efficiency of export plant quarantine inspection by using injury marks. J Econ Entomol 92:974–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yamamura K, Sugimoto T (1995) Estimation of the pest prevention ability of the import plant quarantine in Japan. Biometrics 51:482–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yamamura K, Katsumata H, Watanabe T (2001) Estimating invasion probabilities: a case study of fire blight disease and the importation of apple fruits. Biol Invasions 3:373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kohji Yamamura
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hajime Katsumata
    • 2
  • Junji Yoshioka
    • 3
  • Tatsuya Yuda
    • 4
  • Kenji Kasugai
    • 5
  1. 1.National Institute for Agro-Environmental SciencesTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Yokohama Plant Protection StationYokohamaJapan
  3. 3.Moji Plant Protection StationKitakyushuJapan
  4. 4.Kagoshima Prefectural Plant Protection OfficeMinamisatsumaJapan
  5. 5.Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations