Advertisement

Population Ecology

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 199–211 | Cite as

Fishing, reproductive volume and regulation: population dynamics and exploitation of the eastern Baltic cod

  • Anders WikströmEmail author
  • Jonas Knape
  • Michele Casini
  • Anna Gårdmark
  • Massimiliano Cardinale
  • Joakim Hjelm
  • Niclas Jonzén
Original article

Abstract

The relative importance of exploitation rate and environmental variability in generating fluctuations of harvested populations is a key issue in academic ecology as well as population management. We studied how the eastern Baltic cod (Gadus morhua) is affected by fishing and environmental variation by using a newly developed single species state-space model. Survey data and auxiliary environmental data were used to estimate the model parameters. The model was then used to predict future development of the eastern Baltic cod under different fishing mortalities and abiotic conditions. Abiotic condition was represented by an index: reproductive volume which is the volume of water suitable (in terms of salinity and oxygen content) for the successful development of the early life stages of Baltic cod. The model included direct density dependence, fishing, and a lagged effect of reproductive volume. Our analysis showed that fishing rate is approximately three times more important than reproductive volume in explaining the population dynamics. Furthermore, our model suggests either under- or over-compensatory dynamics depending on the reproductive volume and long term catch levels. It follows that fishing can either reduce or increase temporal oscillations of the cod stock depending on whether the dynamics is over- or undercompensatory, respectively. The sustainable level of fishing rate is however dependent on reproductive volume. Our model predicts a dual role of fishing rate, stabilizing when reproductive volume is high and destabilizing when it is low. Exploitation rate may therefore increase or decrease the risk of the population of cod dropping below a given biomass reference point depending on the environmental conditions, which has practical implications for fisheries management.

Keywords

Climate Harvesting State-space-model Stochasticity Temporal variation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

A.W. was financially supported by the Swedish Research Council FORMAS (Grant No 2007-549 to N.J), and N.J. is holding a research fellowship from the Swedish Research Council. Thanks also to Hans-Harald Hinrichsen for his helpful provision of oxygen data.

References

  1. Anderson CNK, Hsieh C, Sandin SA, Hewitt R, Hollowed A, Beddington J May, Sugihara RM (2008) Why fishing magnifies fluctuations in fish abundance. Nature 452:835–839PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berryman A (1999) Principles of population dynamics and their application. Stanley Thornes, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  3. Box GEP, Jenkins MG (1976) Times series analysis: Forecasting and control. Holden day, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  4. Brook SP, Gelman P (1998) General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J Comp Graph Stat 7:434–455Google Scholar
  5. Cardinale M, Arrhenius F (2000) The influence of stock structure and environmental conditions on the recruitment process of Baltic cod estimated using a generalized additive model. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 12:2402–2409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casini M, Lovgren J, Hjelm J, Cardinale M Molinero, Kornilovs JC (2008) Multi-level trophic cascades in a heavily exploited open marine ecosystem. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 275:1793–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casini M, Hjelm J, Molinero J-C, Lövgren J, Cardinale M, Valerio B, Belgrano A, Kornilovs G (2009) Trophic cascades promote threshold-like shifts in pelagic marine ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:197–202PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennis B, Kemp WP, Taper ML (1998) Joint density dependence. Ecology 79:426–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dennis B, Ponciano JM, Lele SR, Taper ML, Staples DF (2006) Estimating density dependence, process noise, and observation error. Ecol Monogr 76:323–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Durbin J, Koopman SJ (2001) Time series analysis by state-space methods. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Eero M, Koster FW, MacKenzie BR (2008) Reconstructing historical stock development of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in the eastern Baltic Sea before the beginning of intensive exploitation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65:2728–2741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeman SN, Kirkwood GP (1995) On a structural time series method for estimating stock biomass and recruitment from catch and effort data. Fish Res 22:77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gamito S (1998) Growth models and their usage in ecological modeling: an application to a fish population. Ecol Model 113:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gelman A (2006) Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper). Bayesian Analysis 1:515–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heikinheimo O (2008) Average salinity as an index for environmental forcing on cod recruitment in the Baltic Sea. Boreal Environ Res 13:457–464Google Scholar
  16. Hilborn R (2012) The evolution of quantitative marine fisheries management 1985-2010. Nat Res Mod 25:122–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hilborn R, Walters CJ (1992) Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: choice, dynamics and uncertainty. Chapman & Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hillborn R (2001) Calculation of biomass trend, exploitation rate, and surplus production from survey data and catch. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:579–584Google Scholar
  19. Hsieh C, Reiss CS, Hunter JR, Beddington JR, May RM, Sugihara G (2006) Fishing elevates variability in the abundance of exploited species. Nature 443:859–862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea) (1990) Stock assessment reports from 1990 to 2010. ICES Headquarters, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  21. ICES (2008) Report of the Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group (WGBFAS), 8 -17 April 2008, ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen. ICES CM 2008\ACOM:06Google Scholar
  22. ICES (2009) Report of the ICES/HELCOM Working Group on Integrated Assessments of the Baltic Sea (WGIAB), 16–20 March 2009, Rostock, Germany. ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen. ICES CM 2009/BCC:02Google Scholar
  23. ICES (2010) Report of the Baltic International Fish Survey Working Group (WGBIFS), 22–26 March 2010, Klaipeda, Lithuania. ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen. ICES CM 2010/SSGESST:07Google Scholar
  24. ICES (2011) Report of the Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group (WGBFAS), 12-19 April 2011, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES CM 2011/ACOM:10Google Scholar
  25. Jonzén N, Lundberg P, Cardinale M, Arrhenius F (2001) Variable fishing mortality and the possible commercial extinction of the eastern Baltic cod. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 210:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jonzén N, Ripa J, Lundberg P (2002a) A theory of stochastic harvesting in stochastic environments. Am Nat 159:427–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jonzén N, Cardinale M, Gardmark A, Arrhenius F, Lundberg P (2002b) Risk of collapse in the eastern Baltic cod fishery. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 240:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jonzén N, Pople AR, Grigg GC, Possingham HP (2005) Of sheep and rain: large-scale population dynamics of the red kangaroo. J Anim Ecol 74:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaitala V, Ranta E, Lindström J (1996) Cyclic population dynamics and random perturbations. J Anim Ecol 65:249–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knape J (2008) Estimability of density dependence in models of time series data. Ecology 89:2994–3000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knape J, Jonzén N, Sköld M, Sokolov L (2009) Multivariate state-space modelling of bird migration count data. In: Thomson DL, Cooch EG, Conroy MJ (eds) Modeling demographic processes in marked populations. Environmental and ecological statistics, vol. 3. Springer, Berlin, pp 59-79Google Scholar
  32. Köster FW, Möllmann C, Hinrichsen H-H, Tomkiewicz J, Wieland K, Kraus G, Voss R, MacKenzie BR, Schnack D, Makarchouk A, Plikshs M, Beyer JE (2005) Baltic cod recruitment—the impact of climate variability on key processes. ICES J Mar Sci 62:1408–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindegren M, Moellmann C, Nielsen A, Stenseth NC (2009) Preventing the collapse of the Baltic cod stock through an ecosystem-based management approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:14722–14727PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindegren M, Möllman C, Nielsen A, Brander K, MacKenzie BR, Stenseth NC (2010) Ecological forecasting under climate change: the case of the Baltic cod. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 277:2121–2130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lobón-Cerviá J (2011) Why fishing does not magnify temporal fluctuations in the population abundance of stream-living salmonids. Rev Fish Sci 19:246–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacKenzie BR, Hinrichsen H-H, Plikshs K, Wieland K, Zerzera AS (2000) Quantifying environmental heterogeneity: habitat size necessary for successful development of cod Gadus morhua eggs in the Baltic Sea. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 193:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MacKenzie BR, Gislason H, Möllmann C, Köster FW (2007) Impact of 21st century climate change on the Baltic Sea fish community and fisheries. Global Change Biol 13:1348–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McIntosh RP (1985) The background of ecology: concept and theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Methot RD Jr, Wetzel CR (2013) Stock synthesis: a biological and statistical framework for fish stock assessment and fishery management. Fish Res 142:86–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Millar B, Meyer R (2000) Bayesian state-space modeling of age-structured data: fitting a model is just the beginning. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nissling A, Vallin L (1996) The ability of Baltic cod eggs to maintain neutral buoyancy and the opportunity for survival in fluctuating conditions in the Baltic Sea. J Fish Biol 48:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Plikshs M, Kalejs M, Graumann G (1993) The influence of environmental conditions and reproductive stock size on the year-class strength of the Eastern Baltic cod. ICES document CM 1993/J:22Google Scholar
  43. Quinn TJ, Deriso RB (1999) Quantitative fishery dynamics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Shelton AO, Mangel M (2011a) Fluctuations of fish populations and the magnifying effects of fishing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:7075–7080PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shelton OA, Mangel M (2011b) Reply to Sugihara et al.: the biology of variability in fish populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:E1226–E1226PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. SMHI (2010) Swedish metrological and hydrological institute. Folkborgsvägen 1Google Scholar
  47. Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D (2007) WINBUGS 1.4.3, Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling. Manual. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  48. Sugihara G, Beddington J, Hsieh C-H, Deyle E, Fogarty M, Glaser SM, Hewitt R, Hollowed A, May RM, Munch SB, Perretti C, Rosenberg AA, Sandin S, Ye H (2011) Are exploited fish populations stable? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:E1224–E1225PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thorsen AOS (1996) Physiological mechanisms of buoyancy in eggs from brackish water cod. J Fish Biol 48:457–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vainikka A, Gaardmark A, Bland B, Hjelm J (2009) Two- and three-dimensional maturation reaction norms for the eastern Baltic cod, Gadus morhua. ICES J Mar Sci 66:248–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Walters CJ, Martell SJD (2004) Fisheries ecology and management. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  52. Wikström A, Ripa J, Jonzén N (2012) The role of harvesting in age-structured populations: disentangling dynamics and age truncation effects. Theor Popul Biol 82:348–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anders Wikström
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jonas Knape
    • 2
  • Michele Casini
    • 3
  • Anna Gårdmark
    • 4
  • Massimiliano Cardinale
    • 3
  • Joakim Hjelm
    • 3
  • Niclas Jonzén
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology (Theoretical Population Ecology and Evolution Group), Ecology BuildingLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.Department of EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  3. 3.Department of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Marine ResearchSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesLysekilSweden
  4. 4.Department of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Coastal ResearchSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesÖregrundSweden

Personalised recommendations