Abstract
One of the most important questions in biological control is whether multiple natural enemies can provide greater suppression of agricultural pests than a single best enemy. Intraguild predation (IGP) among natural enemies has often been invoked to explain failure of biological control by multiple enemies, and classical theoretical studies on IGP have supported this view. However, empirical studies are inconclusive and have yielded both positive and negative results. We extend classical models by considering anti-predator behavior of pests and diet switching of omnivorous natural enemies, and examine their effects on pest control. We assume that the pest can adaptively allocate effort toward the specific defense against each predator, and that the omnivorous natural enemy can consume disproportionately more of the relatively abundant prey (switching predation) by type III functional responses to prey items. The model predicts that adaptive defense augments pests but favors introduction of multiple natural enemies for controlling pests if IGP is weak. In contrast, switching predation does not make pest control by multiple natural enemies advantageous as in classical studies, in the absence of adaptive defense. However, switching predation reduces the necessity of defense by the pest against the omnivore and offsets the effect of adaptive defense. Thus, it makes the introduction of multiple natural enemies advantageous for pest control when the pest employs adaptive defense even if IGP is strong. These results suggest that types and combinations of behavior of prey and predators may greatly affect qualitative outcomes of biological control by multiple natural enemies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams PA, Fung SR (2010) Prey persistence and abundance in systems with intraguild predation and type-2 functional responses. J Theor Biol 264:1033–1042
Arim M, Marquet PA (2004) Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biology. Ecol Lett 7:557–564
Armstrong RA, McGehee R (1980) Competitive exclusion. Am Nat 115:151–170
Bernstein C (1984) Prey and predator emigration responses in the acarine system Tetranychus urticae-Phytoseiulus persimilis. Oecologia 61:134–142
Briggs CJ, Borer ET (2005) Why short-term experiments may not allow long-term predictions about intraguild predation. Ecol Appl 15:1111–1117
Chow A, Chau A, Heinz KM (2008) Compatibility of Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) with Amblyseius (Iphiseius) degenerans (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for control of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on greenhouse roses. Biol Control 44:259–270
Cortez MH (2011) Comparing the qualitatively different effects rapidly evolving and rapidly induced defences have on predator-prey interactions. Ecol Lett 14:202–209
Daugherty MP, Harmon JP, Briggs CJ (2007) Trophic supplements to intraguild predation. Oikos 116:662–677
Davey JS, Vaughan IP, King RA, Bell JR, Bohan DA, Bruford MW, Holland JM, Symondson WOC (2013) Intraguild predation in winter wheat: prey choice by a common epigeal carabid consuming spiders. J Appl Ecol 50:271–279
Dinter A (2002) Microcosm studies on intraguild predation between female erigonid spiders and lacewing larvae and influence of single versus multiple predators on cereal aphids. J Appl Entomol 126:249–257
Eubanks MD (2001) Estimates of the direct and indirect effects of red imported fire ants on biological control in field crops. Biol Control 21:35–43
Foglar H, Malausa JC, Wajnberg E (1990) The functional response and preference of Macrolophus caliginosus [Heteroptera: Miridae] for two of its prey: Myzus persicae and Tetranychus urticae. Entomophaga 35:465–474
Griffin JN, Byrnes JEK, Cardinale BJ (2013) Effects of predator richness on prey suppression: a meta-analysis. Ecology 94:2180–2187
Grostal P, Dicke M (1999) Direct and indirect cues of predation risk influence behavior and reproduction of prey: a case for acarine interactions. Behav Ecol 10:422–427
Hiltunen T, Hairston NG Jr, Hooker G, Jones LE, Ellner SP (2014) A newly discovered role of evolution in previously published consumer-resource dynamics. Ecol Lett 17:915–923
Holt RD, Polis GA (1997) A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. Am Nat 149:745–764
Hsu SB, Hubbell SP, Waltman P (1978) A contribution to the theory of competing predators. Ecol Monogr 48:337–349
Hughes RN, Croy MI (1993) An experimental analysis of frequency-dependent predation (switching) in the 15-spined stickleback, Spinachia spinachia. J Anim Ecol 62:341–352
Ikegawa Y, Ezoe H, Namba T, Tuda M (2014) Effects of nonspecific adaptive defense by pests on efficiency of biological control by multiple natural enemies. J Fac Agric Kyusyu Univ 59:305–311
Janssen A, Montserrat M, HilleRisLambers R, de Roos AM, Pallini A, Sabelis W (2006) Intraguild predation usually does not disrupt biological control. In: Broduer J, Boivin G (eds) Trophic and guild interactions in biological control. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–44
Kakehashi N, Suzuki Y, Iwasa Y (1984) Niche overlap of parasitoids in host-parasitoid systems: its consequence to single versus multiple introduction controversy in biological control. J Appl Ecol 21:115–131
Kimbrell T, Holt RD, Lundberg P (2007) The influence of vigilance on intraguild predation. J Theor Biol 249:218–234
Kogan M (1998) Integrated pest management: historical perspectives and contemporary developments. Annu Rev Entomol 43:243–270
Kondoh M (2003) Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food-web complexity and stability. Science 299:1388–1391
Kondoh M (2007) Anti-predator defence and the complexity-stability relationship of food webs. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 274:1617–1624
Kondoh M (2008) Building trophic modules into a persistent food web. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16631–16635
Křivan V (2000) Optimal intraguild foraging and population stability. Theor Popul Biol 58:79–94
Křivan V, Diehl S (2005) Adaptive omnivory and species coexistence in tri-trophic food webs. Theor Popul Biol 67:85–99
Kuijper LDJ, Kooi BW, Zonneveld C, Kooijman SALM (2003) Omnivory and food web dynamics. Ecol Model 163:19–32
Magalhães S, Tudorache C, Montserrat M, van Maanen R, Sabelis MW, Janssen A (2004) Diet of intraguild predators affects antipredator behavior in intraguild prey. Behav Ecol 16:364–370
Matsuda H, Kawasaki K, Shigesada N, Teramoto E, Ricciardi LM (1986) Switching effect on the stability of the prey-predator system with three trophic levels. J Theor Biol 122:251–262
Matsuda H, Hori M, Abrams PA (1996) Effects of predator-specific defence on biodiversity and community complexity in two-trophic-level communities. Evol Ecol 10:13–28
Murdoch WW, Avery S, Smyth MEB (1975) Switching in predatory fish. Ecology 56:1094–1105
Nakazawa T, Miki T, Namba T (2010) Influence of predator-specific defense adaptation on intraguild predation. Oikos 119:418–427
Okuyama T (2009) Intraguild predation in biological control: consideration of multiple resource species. Biocontrol 54:3–7
Pace ML, Cole JJ, Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1999) Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 14:483–488
Pallini A, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (1999) Spider mites avoid plants with predators. Exp Appl Acarol 23:803–815
Polis GA, Holt RD (1992) Intraguild predation: the dynamics of complex trophic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 7:151–154
Polis GA, Myers CA, Holt RD (1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:297–330
Rosenheim JA (1998) Higher-order predators and the regulation of insect herbivore populations. Annu Rev Entomol 43:421–447
Rosenheim JA (2001) Source-sink dynamics for a generalist insect predator in habitats with strong higher-order predation. Ecol Monogr 71:93–116
Rosenheim JA, Wilhoit LR, Armer CA (1993) Influence of intraguild predation among generalist insect predators on the suppression of an herbivore population. Oecologia 96:439–449
Rosenheim JA, Kaya HK, Ehler LE, Marois JJ, Jaffee BA (1995) Intraguild predation among biological-control agents: theory and evidence. Biol Control 5:303–335
Saavedra JLD, Torres JB, Ruiz MG (1997) Dispersal and parasitism of Heliothis virescens eggs by Trichogramma pretiosum (Riley) in cotton. Int J Pest Manag 43:169–171
Schausberger P, Walzer A (2001) Combined versus single species release of predaceous mites: predator-predator interactions and pest suppression. Biol Control 20:269–278
Shurin JB, Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Anderson K, Blanchette CA, Broitman B, Cooper SD, Halpern BS (2002) A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades. Ecol Lett 5:785–791
Sih A, Englund G, Wooster D (1998) Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol Evol 13:350–355
Snyder WE, Ives AR (2001) Generalist predators disrupt biological control by a specialist parasitoid. Ecology 82:705–716
Snyder WE, Ives AR (2003) Interactions between specialist and generalist natural enemies: Parasitoids, predators, and pea aphid biocontrol. Ecology 84:91–107
Stewart FM, Levin BR (1973) Partitioning of resources and the outcome of interspecific competition: a model and some general considerations. Am Nat 107:171–198
Stiling P, Cornelissen T (2005) What makes a successful biocontrol agent? A meta-analysis of biological control agent performance. Biol Control 34:236–246
van Baalen M, Křivan V, van Rijn PCJ, Sabelis MW (2001) Alternative food, switching predators, and the persistence of predator-prey systems. Am Nat 157:512–524
Venzon M, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2001) Prey preference, intraguild predation and population dynamics of an arthropod food web on plants. Exp Appl Acarol 25:785–808
Vos M, Kooi BW, DeAngelis DL, Mooij WM (2004) Inducible defences and the paradox of enrichment. Oikos 105:471–480
Walzer A, Schausberger P (1999) Predation preferences and discrimination between con- and heterospecific prey by the phytoseiid mites Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus. Biocontrol 43:469–478
Yamamichi M, Yoshida T, Sasaki A (2011) Comparing the effects of rapid evolution and phenotypic plasticity on predator-prey dynamics. Am Nat 178:287–304
Yano E (2004) Recent development of biological control and IPM in greenhouses in Japan. J Asia-Pacific Entomol 7:5–11
Acknowledgments
We would like to express sincere thanks to the handling editor and two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on the earlier manuscripts. This research was financially supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI 23570034 to HE and 22570026 to TN.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ikegawa, Y., Ezoe, H. & Namba, T. Adaptive defense of pests and switching predation can improve biological control by multiple natural enemies. Popul Ecol 57, 381–395 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-014-0468-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-014-0468-8