Advertisement

Population Ecology

, 52:27 | Cite as

The effect of learning and search images on predator–prey interactions

  • Yumiko IshiiEmail author
  • Masakazu Shimada
Special Feature: Review Rapid Adaptation

Abstract

In dealing with the spatial and temporal variability of prey species, predators may be able to forage optimally if they have flexible and rapid behavioral plasticity rather than predetermined responses. For predators that learn to focus attention on the cryptic prey type most frequently encountered during recent searching (termed a “search image”), rare prey types may be overlooked because of a focus on more common prey. Search imaging reflects biased searching for one of a number of available prey types, and has been studied widely in birds and mammals. Here we discuss the significant implications of this phenomenon for insect predator–prey systems, particularly with respect to parasitic wasps searching for host species using learned olfactory cues. We (1) review studies about perceptual development through individual ontogeny, (2) define the term “search image” and discuss the cognitive mechanisms involved in search-image formation, (3) discuss the role of search images and frequency-dependent predation as a proximate mechanism in the maintenance of prey diversity, (4) examine data on host–parasitoid olfactory search imaging, and (5) conclude by identifying important research areas for future studies in the field of olfactory search images.

Keywords

Anisopteromalus calandrae Foraging behavior Frequency-dependent predation Infochemicals Olfactory learning Parasitoid 

References

  1. Abrams PA (1999) The adaptive dynamics of consumer choice. Am Nat 153:83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrams PA, Matsuda H (2004) Consequences of behavioral dynamics for the population dynamics of predator–prey systems with switching. Popul Ecol 46:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alborn T, Turlings TCJ, Jones TH, Steinhagen G, Loughrin JH, Tumlinson JH (1997) An elicitor of plant volatiles from beet armyworm oral secretion. Science 276:945–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen JA (1988) Frequency-dependent selection by predators. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 319:485–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barron AB (2001) The life and death of Hopkins’ host-selection principle. J Insect Behav 14:725–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernays EA (1998) The value of being a resource specialist: behavioral support for a neural hypothesis. Am Nat 151:451–464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernays EA (2001) Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation. Annu Rev Entomol 46:703–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernays EA, Funk DJ (1999) Specialists make faster decisions than generalists: experiments with aphids. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernays EA, Wcislo WT (1994) Sensory capabilities, information processing, and resource specialization. Q Rev Biol 69:187–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blackiston DJ, Casey ES, Weiss MR (2008) Retention of memory through metamorphosis: can a moth remember what it learned as a caterpillar? PLoS ONE 3:e736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolhuis JJ, Hogan JA (1999) The development of animal behavior. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Bond AB, Kamil AC (1998) Apostatic selection by blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) searching for virtual prey produces balanced polymorphism. Nature 395:584–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bond AB, Kamil AC (2002) Visual predators select for crypticity and polymorphism in virtual prey. Nature 415:609–613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bouwmeester HJ, Verstappen FWA, Posthumus MA, Dicke M (1999) Spider mite-induced (3S)-(E)-nerolidol synthase activity in cucumber and lima bean. The first dedicated step in acyclic C11-homoterpene biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 121:173–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chittka L, Thomson JD (2005) Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behaviour and floral evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Chittka L, Thomson JD, Waser NM (1999) Flower constancy, insect psychology, and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86:361–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clarke BC (1962) Natural selection in mixed populations of two polymorphic snails. Heredity 17:319–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cook LM, Miller P (1976) Density-dependent selection on polymorphic prey—some data. Am Nat 111:594–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooper JM (1984) Apostatic selection on prey that match the background. Biol J Linn Soc 23:221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Corbet SA (1985) Insect chemosensory responses: a chemical legacy hypothesis. Ecol Entomol 10:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davis JM, Stamps JA (2004) The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends Ecol Evol 19:411–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dawkins MS (1971) Perceptual changes in chicks: another look at the “search image” concept. Anim Behav 19:566–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Boer JG, Posthumus MA, Dicke M (2004) Identification of volatiles that are used in discrimination between plants infested with prey or nonprey herbivores by a predatory mite. J Chem Ecol 30:2215–2230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. De Jong R, Kaiser L (1991) Odor learning by Leptopilina boulardi, a specialist parasitoid (Hymenoptera: Eucoilidae). J Insect Behav 4:743–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Desimone R (1998) Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 353:1245–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dicke M, Sabelis MW (1988) How plants obtain predatory mites as bodyguards. Neth J Zool 38:148–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dukas R (1998) Cognitive ecology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  28. Dukas R (2002) Behavioral and ecological consequences of limited attention. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 357:1539–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dukas R (2008) Evolutionary biology of insect learning. Annu Rev Entomol 53:145–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dukas R, Kamil AC (2001) Limited attention: the constraint underlying search image. Behav Ecol 12:192–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Farris SM, Roberts NS (2005) Coevolution of generalist feeding ecologies and gyrencephalic mushroom bodies in insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:17394–17399Google Scholar
  32. Gandolfi M, Mattiacci L, Dorn S (2003) Preimaginal learning determines adult response to chemical stimuli in a parasitic wasp. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2623–2629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ghimire M, Phillips TW (2008) Effects of prior experience on host selection and host utilization by two populations of Anisopteromalus calandrae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Environ Entomol 37:1300–1306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gould JL (1984) Natural history of honey bee learning. In: Marler P, Terrace HS (eds) The biology of learning. Dahlem Konferenzen, Berlin, pp 149–180Google Scholar
  35. Heinze HJ, Mangun GR, Burchert W, Heinrichs H, Scholz M, Munte TF, Gos A, Scherg M, Johannes S, Hundeshagen H, Gazzaniga MS, Hillyard SA (1994) Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans. Nature 372:543–546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hughes RN, Croy MI (1993) An experimental analysis of frequency-dependent predation (switching) in the 15-spined stickleback, Spinachia spinachia. J Anim Ecol 62:341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ishii Y, Shimada M (2008) Competitive exclusion between contest and scramble strategists in Callosobruchus seed-beetle modeling. Popul Ecol 50:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jackson RR, Li D (2004) One-encounter search-image formation by araneophagic spiders. Anim Cogn 7:247–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Jans N, Nylin S (1997) The role of female search behavior in determining host plant range in plant feeding insects: a test of the information processing hypothesis. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:701–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaiser L, Perez-Maluf R, Sandoz JC, Pham-Delegue MH (2003) Dynamics of odour learning in Leptopilina boulardi, a hymenopterous parasitoid. Anim Behav 66:1077–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kastner S, Ungerleider LG (2000) Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 23:315–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kono H, Reid PJ, Kamil AC (1998) The effect of background cuing on prey detection. Anim Behav 56:963–972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Langley CM, Riley DA, Bond AB, Goel N (1996) Visual search for natural grains in pigeons (Columba livia): search images and selective attention. J Exp Psych Anim Behav Proc 22:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Langley SA, Tilmon KJ, Cardinale BJ, Ives AR (2006) Learning by the parasitoid wasp, Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), alters individual fixed preferences for pea aphid color morphs. Oecologia 150:172–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lewis WJ, Takasu K (1990) Use of learned odours by a parasitic wasp in accordance with host and food needs. Nature 348:635–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lill JT, Marquis RJ, Ricklefs RE (2002) Host plants influence parasitism of forest caterpillars. Nature 417:170–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Margulies C, Tully T, Dubnau J (2005) Deconstructing memory in Drosophila. Curr Biol 15:700–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Menzel R (1985) Learning in honey bees in an ecological and behavioral context. In: Holldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 55–74Google Scholar
  49. Menzel R (2001) Searching for the memory trace in a mini-brain, the honeybee. Learn Mem 8:53–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Mery F, Kawecki TJ (2003) A fitness cost of learning ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc London B 270:2465–2469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mery F, Kawecki TJ (2004) An operating cost of learning in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav 68:589–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moran J, Desimone R (1985) Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science 229:782–784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Murdoch WW (1969) Switching in general predators: experiments on predator specificity and stability of prey populations. Ecol Monogr 39:335–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975) Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res 9:1–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nams VO (1997) Density-dependent predation by skunks using olfactory search images. Oecologia 110:440–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Olendorf R, Rodd FH, Punzalan D, Houde AE, Hurt C, Reznick DN (2006) Frequency-dependent survival in natural guppy populations. Nature 441:633–636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Onodera J, Matsuyama S, Suzuki T, Fujii K (2002) Host-recognizing kairomones for parasitic wasp, Anisopteromalus calandrae, from larvae of azuki bean weevil, Callosobruchus chinensis. J Chem Ecol 28:1209–1220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Papaj DR, Prokopy RJ (1989) Ecological and evolutionary aspects of learning in phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 34:315–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pietrewicz AT, Kamil AC (1979) Search image formation in the blue jay, Cyanocitta cristata. Science 204:1332–1333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Plaisted KC (1997) The effect of interstimulus interval on the discrimination of cryptic targets. J Exp Psych Anim Behav Proc 23:248–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Punzalan D, Rodd FH, Hughes KA (2005) Perceptual processes and the maintenance of polymorphism through frequency-dependent predation. Evol Ecol 19:303–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Raffa KF, Hobson KR, LaFontaine S, Aukema BH (2007) Can chemical communication be cryptic? Adaptations by herbivores to natural enemies exploiting prey semiochemistry. Oecologia 153:1009–1019CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Rausher MD (1978) Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science 200:1071–1073CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Ricklefs R, O’Rourke K (1975) Aspect diversity in moths: a temperate–tropical comparison. Evolution 29:313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rogers LJ (1990) Light input and the reversal of functional lateralization in the chicken brain. Behav Brain Res 38:211–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Roughgarden J, Feldman M (1974) Species packing and predation pressure. Ecology 56:489–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smid HM, Wang G, Bukovinszky T, Steidle JLM, Bleeker AMK, van Loon JJA, Vet LEM (2007) Species-specific acquisition and consolidation of long-term memory in parasitic wasps. Proc R Soc B 274:1539–1546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Spitzer H, Desimone R, Moran J (1988) Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. Science 240:338–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Stamps JA, Davis JM (2006) Adaptive effects of natal experience on habitat selection by dispersers. Anim Behav 72:1279–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Steidle JLM, van Loon JJA (2003) Dietary specialization and infochemical use in carnivorous arthropods: testing a concept. Entomol Exp Appl 108:133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stephens DW (1993) Learning and behavioural ecology: incomplete information and environmental predictability. In: Papaj DR, Lewis AC (eds) Insect learning: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 195–218Google Scholar
  72. Stephens DW, Brown JS, Ydenberg RC (2007) Foraging: behavior and ecology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  73. Takabayashi J, Sabelis MW, Janssen A, Shiojiri K, van Wijk M (2006) Can plants betray the presence of multiple herbivore species to predators and parasitoids? The role of learning in phytochemical information networks. Ecol Res 21:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tinbergen L (1960) The natural control of insects in pinewoods. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds. Arch Neer Zool 13:265–343Google Scholar
  75. Turlings TCJ, Wackers FL, Vet LEM, Lewis WJ, Tumlinson JH (1993) Learning of host-finding cues by hymenopterous parasitoids. In: Papaj DR, Lewis AC (eds) Insect learning: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 51–78Google Scholar
  76. van Nouhuys S, Kaartinen R (2008) A parasitoid wasp uses landmarks while monitoring potential resources. Proc R Soc B 275:377–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Verghese P (2001) Visual search and attention: a signal detection theory approach. Neuron 31:523–535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Vet LM (1999) From chemical to population ecology: infochemical use in an evolutionary context. J Chem Ecol 25:31–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vet LEM, Dicke M (1992) Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annu Rev Entomol 37:141–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vet LEM, Lewis WJ, Carde RT (1995) Parasitoid foraging and learning. In: Carde RT, Bell WJ (eds) Chemical ecology of insects. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 65–104Google Scholar
  81. Volkl W, Sullivan DJ (2000) Foraging behavior; host plant and host location in the aphid hyperparasitoid Euneura augarus. Entomol Exp Appl 97:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wallman J (1979) A minimal visual restriction experiment: preventing chicks from seeing their feet affects later responses to mealworms. Dev Psychobiol 12:391–397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Weiss MR (1997) Innate colour preferences and flexible colour learning in the pipevine swallowtail. Anim Behav 53:1043–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. White JA, Andow DA (2007) Foraging for intermittently refuged prey: theory and field observations of a parasitoid. J Anim Ecol 76:1244–1254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology and Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Systems Sciences (Biology)The University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations