Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Survival and fidelity of an enclosed white-tailed deer population using capture–recapture-reporting data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Population Ecology

Abstract

The number of animal populations enclosed by impermeable fences has increased, which poses issues related to the behavior of individuals and populations. Despite the increased number of fenced enclosures, there is a paucity of survival and fidelity data on white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) from fenced enclosures. Therefore, we examined marked deer recaptures and resightings over 13 years for an enclosed population of white-tailed deer in Oklahoma, USA, to estimate survival and fidelity parameters. We found that a step model was the best model of survival for both sexes. Survival of females and males was greater after hunting was suspended. Average female survival was 77% before hunting was suspended but increased to 98% after. Male survival was also greater after (99%) hunting was suspended compared to before (58%). Females exhibited greater site fidelity (84–94%) than males for all age groups except old individuals, which showed similar site fidelities for males and females. Fidelity was highest for old males (85%), followed by adult (74%), fawn (61%), and yearling males (56%). Our high-tensile electric fence allowed management goals to be achieved through increased survival while potentially maintaining genetic diversity through the exchange of limited numbers of individuals from surrounding areas. However, if the goal is to confine deer to limit disease spread or protect sensitive areas (e.g., airports) from deer encroachment, then other fence designs may be necessary, because our fence was not completely effective at controlling deer movements for these purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burnham KP (1993) A theory for combined analysis of ring recovery and recapture data. In: Lebreton J-D, North PM (eds) Marked individuals in the study of bird population. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 199–213

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

  • Catchpole EA, Freeman SN, Morgan BJT, Harris MP (1998) Integrated recovery/recapture data analysis. Biometrics 54:33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G (1966) Mortality patterns in mammals. Ecology 47:906–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behavior and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  • Conner MC, Soutiere EC, Lancia RA (1987) Drop-netting deer: cost and incidence of capture myopathy. Wildl Soc Bull 15:434–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooch E, White GC (2007) Program MARK: a gentle introduction, 6th edn. http://www.phidot.org/software/mark/docs/book/. Accessed 19 Jan 2008

  • Demarais S, DeYoung RW, Lyon LJ, Williams ES, Williamson SJ, Wolfe GJ (2002) Biological and social issues related to confinement of wild ungulates. Wildlife Society Technical Review 02–3. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda

  • DeYoung RW (2004) Effects of social and population characteristics on the reproductive success of male white-tailed deer (Ph.D. dissertation). Mississippi State University, Mississippi State

  • DeYoung RW, Demarais S, Gee KL, Honeycutt RL, Hellickson MW, Gonzales RA (2009) Molecular evaluation of the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) mating system. J Mammal 90:946–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinkines WC, Lochmiller RL, Bartush WS, DeYoung CA, Qualls CW Jr, Fulton RW (1992) Cause-specific mortality of white-tailed deer as influenced by military training activities in southwestern Oklahoma. J Wildl Dis 28:391–399

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ditchkoff SS, Welch ER Jr, Lochmiller RL, Masters RE, Starry WR (2001) Age-specific causes of mortality among male white-tailed deer support mate-competition theory. J Wildl Manage 65:552–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson FS (1982) Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals. Anim Behav 30:1183–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusek GL, Mackie RJ, Herriges JD Jr, Compton BB (1989) Population ecology of white-tailed deer along the Yellowstone River. Wildl Monogr 104:1–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller TK (1990) Dynamics of a declining white-tailed deer population in north-central Minnesota. Wildl Monogr 110:1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Delorme D, Boutin JM, Van Laere G, Boisaubert B, Pradel R (1993) Roe deer survival patterns: a comparative analysis of contrasting populations. J Anim Ecol 62:778–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toïgo C (2000) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee KL, Porter MD, Demarais S, Bryant FC, Vreede GV (1994) White-tailed deer: their foods and management in the Cross Timbers, 2nd edn (Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation Publication NF-WF-94-01). Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore

  • Gee KL, Holman JH, Demarais S (1999) A man-power efficient drop-net system for capturing white-tailed deer. Proc Annu Southeast Deer Study Group 22:31

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee KL, Holman JH, Causey MK, Rossi AN, Armstrong JB (2002) Aging white-tailed deer by tooth replacement and wear: a critical evaluation of a time-honored technique. Wildl Soc Bull 30:387–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems, philopatry, and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28:1140–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen LP, Beringer J (2003) Survival of rural and urban white-tailed deer in Missouri. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies 57:326–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen LP, Nixon CM, Beringer J (1997) Role of refuges in the dynamics of outlying deer populations: two examples from the Agricultural Midwest. In: McShea WJ, Underwood HB, Rappole JH (eds) The science of overabundance: deer ecology and population management. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 327–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt DG, Villarreal J, Hellickson MW (1999) Population management of white-tailed deer. In: Proc 4th Int Wildlife Conservation and Management Workshop in Northern Mexico and South Texas, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico, 19–20 Aug 1999, pp 269–277

  • Lebreton J-D, Burnham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR (1992) Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol Monogr 62:67–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loison A, Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard J-M, Jorgenson JT, Jullien J-M (1999) Age-specific survival in five populations of ungulates: evidence of senescence. Ecology 80:2539–2554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long ES, Diefenbach DR, Rosenberry CS, Wallingford BD (2008) Multiple proximate and ultimate causes of natal dispersal in white-tailed deer. Behav Ecol 19:1235–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy JE, Hewitt DG, Bryant FC (2005) Dispersal by yearling male white-tailed deer and implications for management. J Wildl Manage 69:366–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller KV, Muller LI, Demarais S (2003) White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). In: Feldhamer GA, Thompson BC, Chapman JA (eds) Wild mammals of North America: biology, management and conservation. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 906–930

  • National Climatic Data Center (1993–2005) Climatological data annual summary: Oklahoma, vols 102–114. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, Asheville. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html. Accessed 28 March 2008

  • Nelson ME (1993) Natal dispersal and gene flow in white-tailed deer in northeastern Minnesota. J Mammal 74:316–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson ME, Mech LD (1984) Home range formation and dispersal of deer in northeastern Minnesota. J Mammal 65:567–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson ME, Mech LD (1986) Mortality of white-tailed deer in northeastern Minnesota. J Wildl Manage 50:691–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon CM, Hansen LP, Brewer PA, Chelsvig JE (1991) Ecology of white-tailed deer in an intensively farmed region of Illinois. Wildl Monogr 118:1–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon CM, Mankin PC, Etter DR, Hansen LP, Brewer PA, Chelsvig JE, Esker TL, Sullivan JB (2007) White-tailed deer dispersal behavior in an agricultural environment. Am Midl Nat 157:212–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozoga JJ, Clute RK (1988) Mortality rates of marked and unmarked fawns. J Wildl Manage 52:549–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson MN, Lopez RR, Frank PA, Peterson MJ, Silvy NJ (2003) Evaluating capture methods for urban white-tailed deer. Wildl Soc Bull 31:1176–1187

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralls K, Brugger K, Ballou J (1979) Inbreeding and juvenile mortality in small populations of ungulates. Science 206:1101–1103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey CW (1968) A drop-net deer trap. J Wildl Manage 32:187–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Severinghaus CW (1949) Tooth development and wear as criteria of age in white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manage 13:195–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw JC, Lancia RA, Conner MC, Rosenberry CS (2006) Effect of population demographics and social pressures on white-tailed deer dispersal ecology. J Wildl Manage 70:1293–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidhu LA, Catchpole EA, Dann P (2007) Mark–recapture-recovery modeling and age-related survival in little penguins (Eudyptula minor). Auk 124:815–827

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrowe RD, Springer PF (1970) Seasonal activity patterns of white-tailed deer in eastern South Dakota. J Wildl Manage 34:420–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VerCauteren KC (1998) Dispersal, home range fidelity, and vulnerability of white-tailed deer in the Missouri River Valley (Ph.D. dissertation). University of Nebraska, Lincoln

  • Webb SL, Hewitt DG, Hellickson MW (2007a) Survival and cause-specific mortality of mature male white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manage 71:555–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb SL, Hewitt DG, Hellickson MW (2007b) Scale of management for mature male white-tailed deer as influenced by home range and movements. J Wildl Manage 71:1507–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb SL, Hewitt DG, Hellickson MW (2007c) Effects of permanent water on home ranges and movements of adult male white-tailed deer in southern Texas. Tex J Sci 59:261–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb SL, Riffell SK, Gee KL, Demarais S (2009a) Using fractal analyses to characterize movement paths of white-tailed deer and response to spatial scale. J Mammal 90 (in press)

  • Webb SL, Gee KL, Demarais S, Strickland BK, DeYoung RW (2009b) Efficacy of a 15-strand high-tensile electric fence to control white-tailed deer movements. Wildl Biol Pract 5:45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Bartmann RM (1994) Drop nets versus helicopter net guns for capturing mule deer fawns. Wildl Soc Bull 22:248–252

    Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:120–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank J. Holman for his numerous contributions to the project, all interns and volunteers that assisted during deer captures, and E. Post and several anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier drafts. Cooperative funding was provided by the Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation and Mississippi State University Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. This manuscript is contribution WF280 of the Mississippi State University Forest and Wildlife Research Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Mississippi State University, Box 9690, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA

    Stephen L. Webb & Guiming Wang

  2. Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, 2510 Sam Noble Parkway, Ardmore, OK, 73401, USA

    Kenneth L. Gee

Authors
  1. Stephen L. Webb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenneth L. Gee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guiming Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen L. Webb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Webb, S.L., Gee, K.L. & Wang, G. Survival and fidelity of an enclosed white-tailed deer population using capture–recapture-reporting data. Popul Ecol 52, 81–88 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-009-0178-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-009-0178-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation