Skip to main content
Log in

A simple criterion for successful biological control on annual crops

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Population Ecology

Abstract

Population dynamics of pest insect-natural enemy systems on annual crops is quite different from those seen in classic biological control programes. On an annual crop, for example, the persistence of populations of pest insects is forced to terminate when crops are harvested. Pest control on annual crops aims to suppress the maximum density of the pest below a certain level, and a low level equilibrium is not always the aim. It is important to determine the initial impact just after release of a natural enemy in order to determine the success of a biological control program. Therefore, effectiveness of natural enemies should be evaluated by prediction of such short-term population dynamics. This paper presents a new and simple analytical model for successful biological control on annual crops. A criterion of successful biological control is given as the ratio of the pest and natural enemy populations just when the pest begins to decrease. This ratio is derived from the intrinsic rates of natural increase of both populations and the daily total predation by natural enemies. Using this model, criteria on appropriate number and time of release of natural enemies are obtained. The practical applications of this model are discussed with respect to evaluating the success or failure of natural enemy releases in future biological control programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berryman AA (1999) The theoretical foundations of biological control. In: Hawkins BA, Cornell HV (eds) Theoretical approaches to biological control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–21

  • Driesche RG van, Bellows TS Jr (1996) Biological control. Chapman and Hall, New York

  • Embree DG (1966) The role of introduced parasites in the control of the winter moth in Nova Scotia. Can Entomol 98:1159–1168

    Google Scholar 

  • Greathead DJ, Waage JK (1983) Opportunities for biological control of agricultural pest in developing countries. In: World Bank technical paper no. 11. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

  • Hassell MP (1980) Foraging strategies, population models and biological control: a case study. J Anim Ecol 49:603-628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, Varley GC (1969) New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature 223:1113-1137

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1966) The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem Entomol Soc Can 48:1–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker CB (1958) Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27:343–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd NAC, Jervis MA (1996) Population dynamics. In: Jervis MA, Kidd NAC (eds) Insect natural enemies. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 293–374

  • Lenteren JC van (1993) Parasites and predator play a paramount role in pest management. In: Lumsden RD, Vaughn JL (eds) Pest management: biologically based technologies. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., pp 66–81

  • Lenteren JC van, van Roermund HJW (1999) Why is the parasitoid Encarsia folmosa so successful in controlling whiteflies? In: Hawkins BA, Cornell HV (eds) Theoretical approaches to biological control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 116-130

  • Oatman ER, McMurtry JA, Gilstrap FE, Voth V (1977) Effect of releases of Amblyseius californicus on the two spotted spider mite on strawberry in southern California. J Econ Entomol 70:638–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa A, Saito T, Ota M (1999) Biological control of American serpentine leafminer, Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess), on tomato in greenhouses by parasitoids. I. Evaluation of biological control by release of Diglyphus isaea (Walker) in experimental greenhouses (in Japanese). Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 40:113–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis MW, van Rijn PCJ (1997) Predation by insects and mites. In: Lewis T (ed) Thrips as crop pests. CAB, New York, pp 259–354

  • Saito Y, Urano S, Nakao H, Amimoto K, Mori H (1996) A simulation model for predicting the efficiency of biological control of spider mites by phytoseiid predators. 2. Validity tests and data necessary for practical usage (in Japanese). Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 40:113–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RF, Bosch R van den (1967) Integrated control. In: Kilgore WW, Doutt RL (eds) Pest control: biological, physical and selected chemical methods. Academic Press, New York, pp 295–340

  • Smith RA, Reynolds HT (1966) Principles, definitions and scope of integrated pest control. Proc FAO Symp Integr Contr 1:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Yano E (1989) A simulation study of population interaction between the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), and the parasitoid Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). II. Simulation analysis of population dynamics and strategy of biological control. Res Popul Ecol 31:89–104

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to T. Kashio and K. Ohno for their encouragement and thoughtful comments, K. Nagai and N. Sugiura for practical discussions, and R. C. Joshi and Olive Asis for improvement of the English. We also thank the editor and two anonymous referees for their advice for improvement of this article. This work was partly supported by the Japan Science and Technology Corporation, and the Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoru Urano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Urano, S., Shima, K., Hongo, K. et al. A simple criterion for successful biological control on annual crops. Popul Ecol 45, 97–103 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-003-0142-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-003-0142-z

Keywords

Navigation