Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

De novo methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vs. methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections of the spine, similar clinical outcome, despite more severe presentation in surgical patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) is a severe infection of the vertebral body and the adjacent disc space, where Staphylococcus aureus is most commonly isolated. The objective of this retrospective study was to determine risk factors for and compare outcome differences between de novo methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) VO and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) VO. A retrospective cohort study was performed by review of the electronic medical records of 4541 consecutive spine surgery patients. Among these 37 underwent surgical treatment of de novo MRSA and MSSA spinal infections. Patient demographics, pre- and postoperative neurological status (ASIA impairment score), surgical treatment, inflammatory laboratory values, nutritional status, comorbidities, antibiotics, hospital stay, ICU stay, reoperation, readmission, and complications were collected. A minimum follow-up (FU) of 12 months was required. Among the 37 patients with de novo VO, 19 were MRSA and 18 were MSSA. Mean age was 52.4 and 52.9 years in the MRSA and MSSA groups, respectively. Neurological deficits were found in 53% of patients with MRSA infection and in 17% of the patients with MSSA infection, which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Chronic renal insufficiency and malnutrition were found to be significant risk factors for MRSA VO. Preoperative albumin was significantly lower in the MRSA group (p < 0.05). Patients suffering from spinal infection with chronic renal insufficiency and malnutrition should be watched more carefully for MRSA. The MRSA group did not show a significant difference with regard to final clinical outcome despite more severe presentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Nammari SS, Bobak P, Venkatesh R (2007) Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus versus methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus adult haematogenous septic arthritis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:537–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0285-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ambrose GB, Alpert M, Neer CS (1966) Vertebral osteomyelitis. A diagnostic problem. JAMA 197:619–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellova P, Knop-Hammad V, Konigshausen M, Mempel E, Frieler S, Gessmann J, Schildhauer TA, Baecker H (2019) Sonication of retrieved implants improves sensitivity in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20:623. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-3006-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhavan KP, Marschall J, Olsen MA, Fraser VJ, Wright NM, Warren DK (2010) The epidemiology of hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis: a cohort study in a tertiary care hospital. BMC Infect Dis 10:158. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brase A, Ringel F, Stuer C, Meyer B, Stoffel M (2010) Debridement and fusion with polyetheretherketone implants in purulent spondylodiscitis: a clinical experience with nine patients. Acta Neurochir 152:2001–2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0798-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carragee EJ (1997) Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:874–880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cosgrove SE, Sakoulas G, Perencevich EN, Schwaber MJ, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y (2003) Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 36:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1086/345476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dufour V, Feydy A, Rillardon L, Redondo A, Le Page L, Bert F, Belmatoug N, Fantin B (2005) Comparative study of postoperative and spontaneous pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 34:766–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2004.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Faraj AA, Webb JK (2000) Spinal instrumentation for primary pyogenic infection report of 31 patients. Acta Orthop Belg 66:242–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frederickson B, Yuan H, Olans R (1978) Management and outcome of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 131:160–167

  11. Fridkin SK, Hageman JC, Morrison M, Sanza LT, Como-Sabetti K, Jernigan JA, Harriman K, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Farley MM, Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Program of the Emerging Infections Program N (2005) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in three communities. N Engl J Med 352:1436–1444. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Frieler S, Gessmann J, Jettkant B, Ronge JM, Koller M, Schildhauer TA, Baecker H (2019) Temporary arthrodesis of the knee in two-stage septic prosthesis exchange : in vitro analysis of adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus on steel and carbon fiber rods. Der Orthopade 48:130–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-018-3654-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gelfand MS, Cleveland KO (2004) Vancomycin therapy and the progression of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vertebral osteomyelitis. South Med J 97:593–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hadjipavlou AG, Mader JT, Necessary JT, Muffoletto AJ (2000) Hematogenous pyogenic spinal infections and their surgical management. Spine 25:1668–1679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hlavin ML, Kaminski HJ, Ross JS, Ganz E (1990) Spinal epidural abscess: a ten-year perspective. Neurosurgery 27:177–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Inoue S, Moriyama T, Horinouchi Y, Tachibana T, Okada F, Maruo K, Yoshiya S (2013) Comparison of clinical features and outcomes of staphylococcus aureus vertebral osteomyelitis caused by methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive strains. SpringerPlus 2:283. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-283

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jaramillo-de la Torre JJ, Bohinski RJ, Kuntz C (2006) Vertebral osteomyelitis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 17:339–351, vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2006.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson AP, Pearson A, Duckworth G (2005) Surveillance and epidemiology of MRSA bacteraemia in the UK. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Khatib R, Saeed S, Sharma M, Riederer K, Fakih MG, Johnson LB (2006) Impact of initial antibiotic choice and delayed appropriate treatment on the outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 25:181–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-006-0096-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koder K, Hardt S, Gellert MS, Haupenthal J, Renz N, Putzier M, Perka C, Trampuz A (2020) Outcome of spinal implant-associated infections treated with or without biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a 10-year cohort study. Infection. 48:559–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-020-01435-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Krogsgaard MR, Wagn P, Bengtsson J (1998) Epidemiology of acute vertebral osteomyelitis in Denmark: 137 cases in Denmark 1978-1982, compared to cases reported to the National Patient Register 1991-1993. Acta Orthop Scand 69:513–517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Livorsi DJ, Daver NG, Atmar RL, Shelburne SA, White AC Jr, Musher DM (2008) Outcomes of treatment for hematogenous Staphylococcus aureus vertebral osteomyelitis in the MRSA ERA. J Infect 57:128–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2008.04.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lodise TP, McKinnon PS (2005) Clinical and economic impact of methicillin resistance in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 52:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.02.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Loibl M, Stoyanov L, Doenitz C, Brawanski A, Wiggermann P, Krutsch W, Nerlich M, Oszwald M, Neumann C, Salzberger B, Hanses F (2014) Outcome-related co-factors in 105 cases of vertebral osteomyelitis in a tertiary care hospital. Infection 42:503–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-013-0582-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mann S, Schutze M, Sola S, Piek J (2004) Nonspecific pyogenic spondylodiscitis: clinical manifestations, surgical treatment, and outcome in 24 patients. Neurosurg Focus 17:E3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M (2003) The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med 348:1546–1554. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McLeod N, Fisher M, Lasala PR (2019) Vertebral osteomyelitis due to Candida species. Infection 47:475–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-019-01294-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Osenbach RK, Hitchon PW, Menezes AH (1990) Diagnosis and management of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis in adults. Surg Neurol 33:266–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Park KH, Chong YP, Kim SH, Lee SO, Choi SH, Lee MS, Jeong JY, Woo JH, Kim YS (2013) Clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect 67:556–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.07.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Patel AR, Alton TB, Bransford RJ, Lee MJ, Bellabarba CB, Chapman JR (2014) Spinal epidural abscesses: risk factors, medical versus surgical management, a retrospective review of 128 cases. Spine J 14:326–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Przybylski GJ, Sharan AD (2001) Single-stage autogenous bone grafting and internal fixation in the surgical management of pyogenic discitis and vertebral osteomyelitis. J Neurosurg 94:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Quinones-Hinojosa A, Jun P, Jacobs R, Rosenberg WS, Weinstein PR (2004) General principles in the medical and surgical management of spinal infections: a multidisciplinary approach. Neurosurg Focus 17:E1. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2004.17.6.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sapico FL, Montgomerie JZ (1979) Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: report of nine cases and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis 1:754–776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shiban E, Janssen I, Wostrack M, Krieg SM, Horanin M, Stoffel M, Meyer B, Ringel F (2014) Spondylodiscitis by drug-multiresistant bacteria: a single-center experience of 25 cases. Spine J 14:2826–2834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shiban E, Janssen I, Wostrack M, Krieg SM, Ringel F, Meyer B, Stoffel M (2014) A retrospective study of 113 consecutive cases of surgically treated spondylodiscitis patients. A single-center experience. Acta Neurochir 156:1189–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2058-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shiban E, Joerger AK, Janssen I, Issa M, Lange N, Wagner A, Feihl S, Ringel F, Meyer B (2020) Low-grade infection and implant failure following spinal instrumentation: a prospective comparative study. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa133

  37. Siddiq F, Chowfin A, Tight R, Sahmoun AE, Smego RA Jr (2004) Medical vs surgical management of spinal epidural abscess. Arch Intern Med 164:2409–2412. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.164.22.2409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Walter J, Kuhn SA, Reichart R, Kalff R, Ewald C (2010) PEEK cages as a potential alternative in the treatment of cervical spondylodiscitis: a preliminary report on a patient series. Eur Spine J 19:1004–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1265-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang JL, Chen SY, Wang JT, Wu GH, Chiang WC, Hsueh PR, Chen YC, Chang SC (2008) Comparison of both clinical features and mortality risk associated with bacteremia due to community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus. Clin Infect Dis 46:799–806. https://doi.org/10.1086/527389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yaw LK, Robinson JO, Ho KM (2014) A comparison of long-term outcomes after meticillin-resistant and meticillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 14:967–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70876-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basem Ishak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the local institutional review board (Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, USA) (STUDY2017000146) and is in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

According to the local institutional review board, for this type of retrospective study, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishak, B., Abdul-Jabbar, A., Moss, G.B. et al. De novo methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vs. methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections of the spine, similar clinical outcome, despite more severe presentation in surgical patients. Neurosurg Rev 44, 2111–2118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01376-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01376-2

Keywords

Navigation