Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spinal subependymoma surgery: do no harm. Little may be more!

  • Review
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Outline the reported diagnostic and operative findings, and evaluate the surgical treatment outcome to clarify the best available recommendations. Methods: Ovid Medline, Embase and PubMed central databases were searched from inception until January 2019 using the terms (subependymoma and (spinal or cervical or thoracic)). The articles were reviewed for reported spinal subependymoma cases perioperative management and treatment outcomes. Results: A total of 49 papers provided data on 105 cases. 47 cases were reported in the last 5 years. The reported cases were two medullary-cervical, 35 cervical, 32 cervicothoracic, 21 thoracic, 12 thoracolumbar and three lumbar. Spinal subependymomas typically arise from within the central spinal canal, giving the appearance of an intramedullary mass, usually eccentric to one side. Symptoms at presentation ranged between 1 month to 17 years, (mean 3.5 years, median 2 years) and were over 3 years in 36, and over 8 years in 12 cases. Sensory symptoms are the most frequent 75(80%), followed by weakness in 60(64%), pain in 45(48%) and sphincter disturbance in 24(25%). Postoperative neurological function was reported in 78 cases, and worsening was reported in 40 cases (51%), of which, 29 (72%) had complete resection, 6 (15%) had subtotal resection and 5 (12%) had partial resection. Neurological status remained the same in 24 (30%) and improved in 14 (18%). Conclusion: The reviewed cases report a rate of 65% total resection of which 57% had worsened function after surgery. There were no reports of malignant transformation; therefore, long-term survival is expected, and surgical caution should be exercised where there is minimal symptom progression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (2016) World health organization histological classification of tumours of the central nervous system. 4th ed revised. International Agency for Research on Cancer, France.

  2. Scheinker I (1945) Subependymoma: a newly recognized tumour of subependymal deivation. J Neurosurg Sci 2(3):232–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyken FC, Cowen D, Iannucci CA et al (1954) Subependymal glomerate astrocytomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 13(1):30–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Slowick F, Pásztor B, Szollosi B (1979) Subependymal gliomas. Neurosurg Rev 2:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuh WT, Chung CK, Park SH, Kim KJ, Lee SH, Kim KT (2018) Spinal cord subependymoma surgery : a multi-institutional experience. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 61(2):233–242

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Amico RS, Praver M, Zanazzi GJ, Englander ZK, Sims JS, Samanamud JL, Ogden AT, McCormick PC, Feldstein NA, McKhann GM II, Sisti MB, Canoll P, Bruce JN (2017) Subependymomas are low-grade heterogeneous glial neoplasms defined by subventricular zone lineage markers. World Neurosurg 107:451–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou S et al (2016) Neuroradiological features of cervical and cervicothoracic intraspinal subependymomas: a study of five cases. Clin Radiol 71(5):499.e9–499.15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Toi H et al (2016) Bamboo leaf sign as a sensitive magnetic resonance imaging finding in spinal subependymoma: case report and literature review. Case Rep Neurol Med 2016:9108641

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi SK, Lee SH, Kim B, Minn YK, Kim KN, Kim SH (2016) Findings from frozen sections of spinal subependymomas: is it possible to differentiate this diagnosis from other common spinal tumors? Brain Tumor Pathol 33(1):19–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu Z et al (2015) Intramedullary cervicothoracic subependymoma: report of three cases and review of the literature. J Orthop Sci 20(5):927–934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu L et al (2014) Surgical outcomes in spinal cord subependymomas: an institutional experience. J Neuro-Oncol 116(1):99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan LA et al (2014) Surgical resection of subependymoma of the cervical spinal cord. Neurosurg Focus 37(Suppl 2):Video 3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cure LM et al (2014) Interesting case of subependymoma of the spinal cord. Spine J 14(5):e9–e12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cervos-Navarro J, Artigas J, Perez-Canto A (1986) Clinical and immunohistological findings in subependymomas of the spinal cord. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 70:376–379

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pluchino F, Lodrini S, Lasio G, Allegranza A (1984) Complete removal of holocord subependymoma. Case report. Acta Neurochir 73(3–4):243–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roeder MB, Jinkins JR, Bazan C 3rd (1994) Subependymoma of filum terminale: MR appearance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18(1):129–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dhandapani S et al (2013) Subependymoma causing conus-cauda syndrome: cured by total excision. Neurol India 61(6):675–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lach B, Russell N, Benoit B (1990) Atypical subependymoma of the spinal cord: ultrastructural and immunohistochemical studies. Neurosurgery 27(2):319–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsumura A, Hori A, Spoerri O (1988) Spinal subependymoma presenting as an extramedullary tumor: case report. Neurosurgery 23(1):115–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dario A et al (2001) Subependymoma of the spinal cord: case report and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci 8(1):48–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bret P et al (1997) Intramedullary subependymoma of the cervical spinal cord. Review of the literature a propos of a case. Neurochirurgie 43(3):158–163

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guha A, Resch L, Tator CH (1989) Subependymoma of the thoracolumbar cord. Case report. J Neurosurg 71(5 Pt 1):781–787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Iwasaki M et al (2013) Thoracolumbar intramedullary subependymoma with multiple cystic formation: a case report and review. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 3):S317–S320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jallo GI, Zagzag D, Epstein F (1996) Intramedullary subependymoma of the spinal cord. Neurosurgery 38(2):251–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Salcman M, Mayer R (1984) Intramedullary subependymoma of the cervical spinal cord: case report. Neurosurgery 14(5):608–611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Salvati M et al (1992) Subependymoma of the spinal cord. Case report and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 15(1):65–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shimada S et al (2003) Subependymoma of the spinal cord and review of the literature. Pathol Int 53(3):169–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bergman TA, Haines SJ (1991) Subependymoma of the cervical spinal cord. A case report of long-term survival. Minn Med 74(11):21–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoeffel C et al (1995) MR manifestations of subependymomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 16(10):2121–2129

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jain A et al (2012) Subependymoma: clinical features and surgical outcomes. Neurol Res 34(7):677–684

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Shinji Yamamoto RK, Kawamoto T et al (2010) Characteristics of intramedullary subependymoma. Spinal Surg 24(1):100–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mr. John Emelifeonwu for assisting with the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences–Neurosurgery, Lothian University Hospitals NHS trust, Edinburgh, UK

    Hamzah A. Soleiman & Andreas K. Demetriades

  2. Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    James Ironside

  3. Department of Neuroradiology, Lothian University Hospitals NHS trust, Edinburgh, UK

    Susan Kealey

Authors
  1. Hamzah A. Soleiman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James Ironside
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susan Kealey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andreas K. Demetriades
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamzah A. Soleiman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

None/not required.

Informed consent

None/not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soleiman, H.A., Ironside, J., Kealey, S. et al. Spinal subependymoma surgery: do no harm. Little may be more!. Neurosurg Rev 43, 1047–1053 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01128-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01128-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation