Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

MRI criteria of subtypes of adenomas and epithelial cysts of the pituitary gland

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the clinical applicability of MRI criteria for differentiation of pituitary adenomas and cystic pituitary lesions. One hundred ninety-eight consecutive patients with surgical resection of a pituitary adenoma/cystic pituitary lesion were retrospectively analyzed, blinded to clinical data and histopathological diagnosis. Different morphologic criteria were assessed: signal intensity in T2/T1w images, pattern of contrast enhancement, size, super-/infrasellar extension, and invasion of the cavernous sinus. For validation of the criteria, a second independent patient cohort (n = 102) was analyzed for diagnostic accuracy of the criteria. We identified differences between subtypes of pituitary adenomas regarding morphological MRI criteria. Especially, ACTH-producing adenomas and GH-producing adenomas showed partially specific imaging features. Application of our criteria on the second patient cohort (n = 102) did however not significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. Only differentiation between cystic pituitary lesions and adenomas was facilitated using these criteria, but did not reach statistical significance in this cohort (P = 0.352). MRI criteria might facilitate differentiation between pituitary adenomas and cystic pituitary lesions, but not between subtypes of pituitary adenomas. These subtypes show partially specific MR imaging features, however, due to a high variability knowledge of clinical symptoms and laboratory findings remain essential for the correct diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baik JS, Lee MH, Ahn KJ, Choi HS, Jung SL, Kim BS, Jeun SS, Hong YK (2015) Characteristic location and growth patterns of functioning pituitary adenomas: correlation with histological distribution of hormone-secreting cells in the pituitary gland. Clin Imaging 39:770–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonneville JF, Bonneville F, Cattin F (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of pituitary adenomas. Eur Radiol 15:543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchfelder M, Nistor R, Fahlbusch R, Huk WJ (1993) The accuracy of CT and MR evaluation of the sella turcica for detection of adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting adenomas in Cushing disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 14:1183–1190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi SH, Kwon BJ, Na DG, Kim JH, Han MH, Chang KH (2007) Pituitary adenoma, craniopharyngioma, and Rathke cleft cyst involving both intrasellar and suprasellar regions: differentiation using MRI. Clin Radiol 62:453–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ezzat S, Asa SL, Couldwell WT, Barr CE, Dodge WE, Vance ML, McCutcheon IE (2004) The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. Cancer 101:613–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. General Assembly of the World Medical A (2014) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. The Journal of the American College of Dentists 81:14–18

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hagiwara A, Inoue Y, Wakasa K, Haba T, Tashiro T, Miyamoto T (2003) Comparison of growth hormone-producing and non-growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: imaging characteristics and pathologic correlation. Radiology 228:533–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C (1993) Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 33:610–617 discussion 617-618

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Larkin, S., & Ansorge, O. (2000). Pathology and pathogenesis of pituitary adenomas and other sellar lesions. In: L. J. De Groot, Chrousos, G., Dungan, K., Feingold, K. R., Grossman, A., Hershman, J. M., Koch, C., Korbonits, M., McLachlan, R., New, M., Purnell, J., Rebar, R., Singer, F., Vinik, A. (Eds.), Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA).

  10. Park M, Lee SK, Choi J, Kim SH, Kim SH, Shin NY, Kim J, Ahn SS (2015) Differentiation between cystic pituitary adenomas and Rathke cleft cysts: a diagnostic model using MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:1866–1873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Potorac I, Petrossians P, Daly AF, Schillo F, Ben Slama C, Nagi S, Sahnoun M, Brue T, Girard N, Chanson P, Nasser G, Caron P, Bonneville F, Raverot G, Lapras V, Cotton F, Delemer B, Higel B, Boulin A, Gaillard S, Luca F, Goichot B, Dietemann JL, Beckers A, Bonneville JF (2015) Pituitary MRI characteristics in 297 acromegaly patients based on T2-weighted sequences. Endocr Relat Cancer 22:169–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Theodros D, Patel M, Ruzevick J, Lim M, Bettegowda C (2015) Pituitary adenomas: historical perspective, surgical management and future directions. CNS Oncology 4:411–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanie Bette.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interests; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements) or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

  • CZ has served on scientific advisory boards for Philips and Bayer-Schering; serves as co-editor on the Advisory Board of Clinical Neuroradiology; has received speaker honoraria from Bayer-Schering and Philips; and has received research support and investigator fees for clinical studies from Biogen Idec, Quintiles, MSD Sharp & Dome, Boehringer Ingelheim, Inventive Health Clinical UK Ltd., Advance Cor, Brainsgate, Pfizer, Bayer-Schering, Novartis, Roche, Servier, Penumbra, WCT GmbH, Syngis, SSS Internartional Clinical Research, PPD Germany GmbH, Worldwide Clinical Trials Ltd., Phenox, Covidien, Actelion, Medivation, Medtronic, Harrison Clinical Research, Concentric, Penumbra, Pharmtrace, Reverse Medical Corp., Premier Research Germany Ltd., Surpass Medical Ltd., and GlaxoSmithKline.

  • SB, JG, and BM work as consultants for Brainlab (Brainlab AG, Munich).

  • JSK has received speaker honoraria from Philips.

  • All named potential conflicts of interest are unrelated to this study.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this retrospective non-interventional study, informed consent was waived by the local ethics committee.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bette, S., Butenschön, V.M., Wiestler, B. et al. MRI criteria of subtypes of adenomas and epithelial cysts of the pituitary gland. Neurosurg Rev 43, 265–272 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-1049-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-1049-7

Keywords

Navigation